This version of Wittenberg is now the legal national forum for Talossa! Feel free to explore it, and to check out the threads for feedback, requests and criticisms to make sure Wittenberg is tailored to you.

Author Topic: [Public] Committee of Legal Reforms  (Read 251 times)

Offline Viteu

  • Puisne Justice of the Uppermost Court
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 102
  • emper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit
    • Talossan since: 2006

    • View Profile
[Public] Committee of Legal Reforms
« on: January 12, 2021, 09:38:32 AM »
My apologies to the Ziu, I realized after the fact that the Committee of Legal Reforms thread is in the Lobby and not in Wittenberg.   I posted based on the "new posts" feed.  Having realized my mistake, the post has been removed.  But I do think there is a conversation that should be open to Talossa-at-large.  So I'm reproducing my commentary here.  The original thread can be found here
______


I want to chime in regarding the alcohol analogy.  Although there is a shared minimum alcohol consumption/purchasing age of 21 among the States, it is not the same law across the Country.  In Wisconsin, someone under the age of 21 can certainly be served an alcoholic beverage in a public establishment by their parent or guardian, while in North Carolina they cannot.  Even assuming Wisconsin did have an outright ban on underage alcohol consumption, it only applies to committing the offense if present in Wisconsin, an 18-year-old who consumes alcohol in Cezembre would not have broken a Wisconsin law because they did not consume alcohol in Wisconsin.  By way of example, my first trip to Europe at age 20, I purchased and consumed a beer in Schwedenplatz (public place) in Vienna.  Did I break New York law? No. New York has a similar law to Wisconsin, but even so, I purchased and consumed alcohol publicly in another country where the conduct was permissible. So I did not have to worry about facing criminal charges when I returned home.

The US, federal and State, rarely imposes criminal liability for conduct that occurs outside of a jurisdiction.  Where it does, it's very limited circumstance--think sex tourism.  So this is not the best analogy.

Regarding the merit of the Regent's thoughts, I generally find them agreeable.  I see the value is removing Wisconsin law from our criminal law, but we cannot possibly address every instance of criminal conduct that may present itself given our resources and needs.  I like the idea of a carefully regulated special counsel, but I would add that a tenant of criminal law is that a person must be able to know what they're doing is illegal.  There must be a benchmark.  Also, Talossa is unique in that we're seeking to hold someone criminally liable for conduct outside of Talossa for general crime.  I'd say further narrowing--only those crimes of such magnitude as to impact the wellness and health of Talossa, should be permissible for consideration of judicial incorporation (I'm thinking of murder or statutory rape as opposed to a speeding ticket).
 

Viteu Marcianüs
Judge of the Uppermost Cort

Offline Viteu

  • Puisne Justice of the Uppermost Court
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 102
  • emper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit
    • Talossan since: 2006

    • View Profile
Re: [Public] Committee of Legal Reforms
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2021, 12:57:04 PM »
Tenant/tenet... Tomato/typo.
Viteu Marcianüs
Judge of the Uppermost Cort

Offline Viteu

  • Puisne Justice of the Uppermost Court
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 102
  • emper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit
    • Talossan since: 2006

    • View Profile
Re: [Public] Committee of Legal Reforms
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2021, 01:02:27 PM »
Per the SOS, the Lobby is open once something is being discussed.  I'm unsure about the rules of which forum is restricted to the Ziu, but given the clarification, no need for this thread.
Viteu Marcianüs
Judge of the Uppermost Cort