I have no objections to removing King John (although considering the many things he has done for our nation, the bill probably should make some sort of mention of that),
but I would never vote for a bill that removes the King without either naming a successor or establishing some sort of meaningful succession procedure.
Otherwise I'm not convinced we will ever have a King or Queen again. If that is the point of the bill then it should be stated as such. If not, then this is a bad idea.
but I would never vote for a bill that removes the King without either naming a successor or establishing some sort of meaningful succession procedure.
Otherwise I'm not convinced we will ever have a King or Queen again. If that is the point of the bill then it should be stated as such. If not, then this is a bad idea.