Thank you, S:reu Perþonest, for your answer.
I think of UC Justice positions as less political in some ways, and more theological. The Justice looks at the text, draws upon their learning, and writes an opinion that has all of the binding force of law simply because they are charged with declaring what the law means. This is not something to take lightly, even in a small and young nation like Talossa.
You currently execute an important office in the Civil Service, Burgermeister of Inland Revenue. By both tradition and, to a lesser degree, statute, the Justices of the UC step back from Talossan political life a bit. Can you speak to any potential conflicts between these two positions? Or do you feel they are ultimately compatible with one another?
Following from that, what do you see as the UC Justice's place in our wider Talossan society, given the step back from politics that is customarily taken?
I think of UC Justice positions as less political in some ways, and more theological. The Justice looks at the text, draws upon their learning, and writes an opinion that has all of the binding force of law simply because they are charged with declaring what the law means. This is not something to take lightly, even in a small and young nation like Talossa.
You currently execute an important office in the Civil Service, Burgermeister of Inland Revenue. By both tradition and, to a lesser degree, statute, the Justices of the UC step back from Talossan political life a bit. Can you speak to any potential conflicts between these two positions? Or do you feel they are ultimately compatible with one another?
Following from that, what do you see as the UC Justice's place in our wider Talossan society, given the step back from politics that is customarily taken?