News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Ian Plätschisch

#361
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on June 01, 2022, 01:00:50 AM
I don't believe there is a list of things in the US Constitution that the Congress is only allowed to legislate on - only a list of things it can't legislate on. This list in the Talossan constitution was copied from the Australian (or perhaps Canadian) constitution, which are federal systems and was meant to reserve certain issues to the provinces/state. It makes no sense in Talossa.
Article I, Section 8:

QuoteThe Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
#362
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on June 01, 2022, 07:27:33 PM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 31, 2022, 09:18:51 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on May 31, 2022, 01:05:23 PM
That seems like a willful misinterpretation of a fairly clear statement from Breneir:  There will be no cooperation with the FreeDems or the PdR on this issue under duress.  You can save yourself the time and trouble of writing any threatening speeches, since the answer will always be a clear "no."  I support Breneir on this 100%: if we reward a tantrum like this now -- before the first Clark! -- then you'll be back with a different threat next week: "Support our next bill or we'll vote down all of yours, regardless of merit."
All we are doing here is pressing you to fulfill your own campaign promise. You can end this immediately without giving anything up; this is what you said you wanted!

This will only continue for as long as you persist in your dishonesty. It's becoming increasingly clear that the TNC's desire for monarchy reform was a lark. If that's true, just admit it and we can get on with our lives.

The words below still express the resolve of TNC members:
There will be no cooperation with the FreeDems or the PdR on this issue under duress.
There was no cooperation with the FreeDems on this issue not under duress either.

Also, the TNC isn't exactly covering itself in glory by acting like it is under "duress." We are asking that you take five minutes to do something that you are already under an obligation to your voters to do. The TNC is facing not a whiff of adversity.
#363
Wittenberg / Re: 42 Days and Counting
June 01, 2022, 02:22:55 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on June 01, 2022, 11:18:46 AMbut he's become more and more active lately. 
It is really saying something that not posting anything for over a month is your definition of "more and more active lately"
#364
Wittenberg / Re: 42 Days and Counting
June 01, 2022, 02:21:20 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on June 01, 2022, 11:00:30 AM
Is this the inactivity you are talking about?

Quote from: King John on April 20, 2022, 05:10:13 PM
...
This is one of the best self-owns I have seen in a while
#365
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on June 01, 2022, 05:00:59 AM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 31, 2022, 09:23:48 PM
The FreeDems will be happy to work with you on this just as soon as the TNC fulfills its campaign promise to their voters the TNC submits to our threats and helps us achieve what voters did not give us a mandate to achieve at the ballot box!

Fixed it for you.
If you consider the fact that the TNC also promised monarchy reform, there is actually a huge mandate for it.
#366
The FreeDems will be happy to work with you on this just as soon as the TNC fulfills its campaign promise to their voters.
#367
What would be the correct method then? We have asked you politely several times. It's really a shame on the TNC that this whole unpleasantness is necessary; monarchy reform is what the party said it wanted! You can end this now without doing anything that you haven't already pledged to do. As I mentioned in another thread, this will only continue for as long as the TNC persists in its dishonesty.
#368
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on May 31, 2022, 01:05:23 PM
That seems like a willful misinterpretation of a fairly clear statement from Breneir:  There will be no cooperation with the FreeDems or the PdR on this issue under duress.  You can save yourself the time and trouble of writing any threatening speeches, since the answer will always be a clear "no."  I support Breneir on this 100%: if we reward a tantrum like this now -- before the first Clark! -- then you'll be back with a different threat next week: "Support our next bill or we'll vote down all of yours, regardless of merit."
All we are doing here is pressing you to fulfill your own campaign promise. You can end this immediately without giving anything up; this is what you said you wanted!

This will only continue for as long as you persist in your dishonesty. It's becoming increasingly clear that the TNC's desire for monarchy reform was a lark. If that's true, just admit it and we can get on with our lives.
#369
If this means that the TNC will not accept any reform, then we have our answer. Is that it?
#370
The Talossan National Congress has stated in multiple places that it is interested in monarchical reform. However, they have repeatedly ignored requests to elaborate on what specific reforms they want. They have not submitted their own amendment but are almost certain to vote down the currently proposed one (the Compromise on the Compromise Act and Amendment).

Monarchy reform is a top priority for the current Government, and in order for anything to pass we will need to work with the TNC. The TNC announcing before the election that they would flatly reject any reform would be understandable. However, campaigning on reform and then stymying any attempt at it by refusing to clarify their position can only be called dishonest.

Therefore, the Government believes the best way to encourage the TNC to stay true to their promise is for all FreeDem and PdR MZs to vote down all TNC bills unless and until they indicate what monarchy reforms they want.
#371
Quote from: Dr. Txec Róibeard dal Nordselvă, Esq., O.SPM, SMM on May 25, 2022, 10:34:15 AM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 23, 2022, 05:46:38 PM
I would like to re-Clark the Compromise on the Compromise Amendment

I have two questions: 1) Has the bill passed the muster of the CRL? and, 2) What is the link to the bill so I can Clark the correct version.

Thanks.
1) Yes, it passed the CRL last term
2) https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=848.0
#372
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, MoFA on May 24, 2022, 11:46:29 AM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 24, 2022, 11:28:40 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on May 24, 2022, 10:46:14 AM
Those sound like good search terms to advertise.  What is the estimated reach of $50 spent on that sort of ad campaign?
Based on what I'm seeing, probably about 40 clicks

How many ads does that actually send out? If it's $0.50 an add, 40 clicks from 100 ads isn't bad at all, even if most of those 40 generate no more than a brief skimming of the website. If it's $0.01 an ad, that's a bit more disappointing, though I realize that any advertising on our part is a bit of a long shot to begin with, so to an extent we may just need to take what we can get.
It's my understanding that you pay $1-$2 per click. It should be on the lower end for us because we won't be advertising on commonly-used searches.
#373
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on May 24, 2022, 10:46:14 AM
Those sound like good search terms to advertise.  What is the estimated reach of $50 spent on that sort of ad campaign?
Based on what I'm seeing, probably about 40 clicks
#374
I would like to re-Clark the Compromise on the Compromise Amendment
#375
Tagging @King John @Baron Alexandreu Davinescu (Túischac'h) and @Breneir Tzaracomprada (Leader of the Opposition) to see if you would be available for a state opening of the Cosa