Perhaps what we need is for the Chancery every couple of years to check out the flow of new citizens, seeing where it's imbalanced towards or away from various provinces, and make a formal recommendation to the Ziu for re-catchment-ing?

I suppose my main thought is why do we need provinces to have an equal number of states as catchment area? Catchment areas don't have an equal number of Brazilian provinces or Swiss cantons, so why do they need an equal share of the US?

For example, Cézembre, which is famously Talossa's european province, has a lot of catchment area in Europe. I don't think we really need additional catchment area in America. On the other hand, Vuode is already the province with the fewest citizens. If we give away some of the most populous states in its catchment area to another province which also has a lot of catchment area elsewhere (Benito) we might as well disband it now.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on April 27, 2024, 05:42:23 PMGuidance from @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB please - do we have to Clark this as one amendment or two?

It must be Clarked as two amendments based on how it is written.

It's two.

Guidance from @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB please - do we have to Clark this as one amendment or two?

I would like to submit
The 9 to 5 Amendment
to be included on the next clark.

Sure, go forth and Clark.

Ok for me ! Give me some time to learn the rules

Quote from: Zilect Uómbat Firă on April 26, 2024, 02:48:19 PMWhat would the population distribution be if we used the US Census regions? (note: I left Wisconsin as-is)

As it turns out, not quite so even.

The purpose of the Hopper is to debate bills and make changes. As SoS, the only time I would refuse a bill is if the bill in the Hopper in its final, debated form is substantially different from what came out of the CRL. The CRL shouldn't be able to say "hey this bill changed a lot, start over." That isn't really its function.