Sticky this for two weeks, please.
Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu on January 27, 2021, 03:45:40 PMQuote from: GV on January 26, 2021, 06:24:13 PMQuote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 10, 2021, 01:19:39 PM
For those interested, the discussion re: the 50 word statements went like this:
ME: "Here's the Option 1 50 words. You should put them all on a page on talossa.com."
THE SOS: "I haven't got Option 2 and 3's 50 words."
ME: "FREAKIN' YIPES!"
... and it was all sorted out in less than a day. Amazing enough that me doing my best to make sure the Status Quo and Dual Monarchy options got their statement on the ballot is being spun by the Regent into something shameful and corrupt.
The Regent is quite right on points of procedure. My question is: why didn't the proponents of options 2 and 3 get their fifty-word statements to the SoS in time? And why was it the leader for Option 1 the person who got the fifty-word statements for the opposing options onto the ballot?
GV
Because I am currently buried in work and have a life outside of Talossa.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 10, 2021, 01:19:39 PM
For those interested, the discussion re: the 50 word statements went like this:
ME: "Here's the Option 1 50 words. You should put them all on a page on talossa.com."
THE SOS: "I haven't got Option 2 and 3's 50 words."
ME: "FREAKIN' YIPES!"
... and it was all sorted out in less than a day. Amazing enough that me doing my best to make sure the Status Quo and Dual Monarchy options got their statement on the ballot is being spun by the Regent into something shameful and corrupt.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 25, 2021, 10:26:43 PMQuote from: GV on January 25, 2021, 10:21:24 PM
Where in talossa.ca is this result?
On the Referendum ballot page. I've double-checked the SoS's calculations and they seem accurate.
Quote from: Dr. Txec Róibeard dal Nordselvă, Esq., O.SPM, SMM on January 25, 2021, 07:53:20 PM
Voting has now closed on the referendum. The results are as follows:
Option 1 - an elected head of state wins the referendum.
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă,
Secretary of State
Quote from: Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on January 10, 2021, 01:26:58 PMQuote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 10, 2021, 01:19:39 PM
For those interested, the discussion re: the 50 word statements went like this:
ME: "Here's the Option 1 50 words. You should put them all on a page on talossa.com."
THE SOS: "I haven't got Option 2 and 3's 50 words."
ME: "FREAKIN' YIPES!"
... and it was all sorted out in less than a day. Amazing enough that me doing my best to make sure the Status Quo and Dual Monarchy options got their statement on the ballot is being spun by the Regent into something shameful and corrupt.
D:na Seneschal, the Government does not conduct elections. It seems deeply problematic for the Government to work in private with the Chancery to coordinate such things. I hope it didn't go any farther and I hope that it doesn't happen again, because it's deeply inappropriate.
I am not insinuating anything: I am saying outright that it is wrong for the Government to privately coordinate with the Chancery and help administer an election. Txec might be your close friend, and it might be trivial to reach out on Facebook and ask about this, and then help him. And it might seem innocent to you, but it's not. Please don't do it again.
Quote from: xpb on January 08, 2021, 09:59:02 AMQuote from: GV on January 07, 2021, 05:23:44 PMQuote from: Adam Grigoriu on January 05, 2021, 02:16:52 PM
I remain amazed at the raw volume of work there is to be done, and what you've gotten done so far. I still have a lot of reading to do.
When you get those Støtanneu archives online, I'd be very interested to take a look. I was looking for a specific article from 1996, and basically gave up because I assumed the only person with a copy was Ben.
You will have to wait a while on that. I've found a few other more-pressing Talossan projects, but I will get back to Støt eventually.
The job of archiving Witt I was able to finish (first pass-through to .html single-file only) last year, but the files are all local to me, and I've not found the time to upload the 20-30 gigs of data yet.
What we need, once-and-for-all is a one-month period in which we all go to OldWitt and archive every thread to single-file .html, .pdf (if possible), .png, and .jpg in such a way the color scheme is 'black-on-white' and not 'white-on-black'. It will make for easier future printing of images of OldWitt.
I have made such an appeal before, but I would love to have someone take that project over.
Should it be of value to the realm, I conduct a backup of my network attached storage at least quarterly and rotate external hard drives back and forth off site to secure storage in a Wells Fargo safe deposit box. I would be happy to include an archive of Talossan data whether it be in raw or compiled forms within that process. There are certainly other options including alternative online storage, but consider this an offer of specific physical storage to augment other archives.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 12, 2021, 03:56:54 PM
Man, it's embarrassing to get a reminder of how little the Ziu (me included) actually reads this stuff. :(