Has S:reu Yasir met the requirements currently outlined in law or not? I cannot grant him citizenship unless he has and I will need some form of proof please.

Thanks,
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă,
Secretary of State

Minister Grischun, let this stand as formal warning as per the rules of Wittiquette that abusive language is not to be accepted.

Thanks,
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă,
Secretary of State

The Chancery reaffirms the above as the valid and enforceable rules of Wittiquette on this forum until such time as the policies can be reviewed and/or updated.

Signed August 24, 2020

Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă,
Secretary of State

Well I'm sure I'm going to piss some people off, but this conversation has gotten completely out of hand and in my capacity as Administrator of Witt as the Secretary of State, I am going to enforce a cooling off period by closing this thread for one week. If anyone has any issues with this, they can file a suit with the Uppermost Cort.

Nope it is because it is Sunday night and I have to teach tomorrow but then I really also frankly need to refocus on more important stuff right now.

Read into what I've said or whatever else you like.

Thanks

AD I don't have time right now to delve into my thinking here but please don't mistake my politeness with agreeing with your legal interpretation. I acted appropriately based on my understanding. You believe the power could be a danger. Others chimed in. We had a nice conversation. I propose that if you don't like this authority then change the law or get a legal ruling if necessary. I hope you enjoy the rest of your evening  .

Thanks

Long story short I believe I acted appropriately. I carefully considered the action and consulted the law as currently written and based on my own understanding as a Justice Emeritus. I am nearly always polite and thoughtful but it should be noted that I will always act in good faith and based on the law. If my interpretation of the law is wrong I'm open to discussion and if needs be legal interpretation.

Just joking of course.

Like I said, I could have erred. I am new to the job after all.

Based on my reading from El Lex J, I believe I do have the authority to maintain things in a proper fashion based on my judgement.

QuoteThe Secretary of State or their designated representative(s) shall act to maintain a minimum level of acceptable behavior on these boards when such action is requested whensoever their own judgment directs that it is necessary. This behavior is not defined in specifics, but shall include generally treating others in a manner that respects Talossa as a community. (53RZ17)

I'd be happy to engage in a substantive discussion on the interpretation of acceptable behavior but in my judgement I believed that it was not acceptable behavior to derail a thread on immigration with a long argument over what constituted broosking. I also feel moving the discussion helped respect Talossa and treating our potential new citizen with respect.

Do whatever makes you happy Sir AD. I'm on a phone at the moment so I can't look things up. It's also possible I erred in my understanding but I think we can all agree someone needed to get that thread back in track. So many complain about the slow pace of immigration and I felt the immigrant deserved to be heard just in case an actual petition was made for him.

First off it was an immigration thread and second the SoS is the administrator of Witt. You all were burying the immigration portion with your ceaseless fighting.

This discussion was distracting from the thread's stated purpose so I moved it.

Thanks,
Dr. Nordselva

Thank you to @Miestră Schivă, UrN and @Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu. Now all I need are the LCC seat assignments from @Ian Plätschisch.

As per your constitutional requirements, be it so ordered:

7 seats be allocated to the LCC
1 seat be allocated to the FreeDems.

The Nimlet shall commence on September 1, 2020.

The Chancery strongly requests a change in Florencia's constitution so they can allocate their own seats in the future.


Dr. Txec dal Nordselva
Secretary of State