News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - GV

#121
Wittenberg / Re: Political Color in Talossa
February 03, 2022, 10:44:43 AM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil on February 03, 2022, 10:03:01 AM
Are there any specific associations of colors with ideologies in Talossan politics? Like, purple with peculiarism, for example.

Good question and one no-one has ever really addressed before...

Talossan politics does not represent a single social, political, or societal continuity.  To be all-too-brief, the demise of the Conservative Loyalist Party in the Kingdom ca. late 2005 or in 2006 is the demise of the old continuity going back to Talossa's beginnings.

In Talossan political terms, that event represents a complete break in Talossan political history. And with that, we have two separate epochs in Talossan political history: 1979-2005 and 2005-present.  The old CLP was the old order, and the RUMP's filling the power and cultural vacuum at that time represents the beginning of the new order which persists to this day.

I mention all of this because an overt color-association with Talossan political ideologies was never really thought about in completely overt terms in the old or new orders, even to today. 

The Progressive Conservative Party (PC) existed from 1985 through ca. 2005 when JJ, its last member, finally dissolved it for good.  The PC was for many years the Party of Ben, JJ, Eiffler, Kane, etc. (incl. yours truly).  It also, at least in Ben's and JJ's minds, mimiced to an extent the ethos of the British Conservative Party, whose overt color continues to be blue. 

PC/blue is the one overt color association in Talossan politics of the old order, though combinations of red and green exist in many parties throughout both political orders.  The ZPT's colors were red, white, and green (JP can confirm this).  The third Liberal Party (dissolved ca. 2001 after the Second Mass Exodus) used the colors yellow and black.

Thus, old-order Talossan politics had blue as the color of conservatism, but in other parties, red was a time or two used as the color of 'challenge to the status quo', but I would need to do more research.

A stark change to this pattern was the revival of the Talossan Black Hand Party in autum 2002, Ben Madison's arch-conservative foil to the PC, which used the colors black-and-white.

In new-order Talossan politics (2005-present), there is no clear association between party colors and ideology save one: green and red being used almost ubiquitously to represent Talossan patriotism.

Hope this helps,

GV
#122
My votes are incoming, but I thought I'd at least get the thread started.
#123
https://houstonchamberchoir.org/circlesong

English-language translations of Native American texts set to music by British composer Bob Chilcott...  This is my 24th season with this ensemble, and you can buy a digital or physical copy at the link above.

And to be sure, we vetted this entire project through a Native American poet who gave her blessing to this entire thing.
#124
Wittenberg / Re: Ministry of Culture Reconvenes SIGN
January 22, 2022, 06:54:31 PM
Quote from: King John on January 22, 2022, 05:57:01 PM
Hear, hear!  <sound of light clapping>  If I can be of any assistance here, I'd be glad to ... although there are those the quality of whose Talossan has passed mine by a long shot.  I always treated the language from the angle of a linguistics geek, rather than actually learning to speak it very well.  <hangs head in shame>

Maybe Lord Hooligan could be lured back to take part in an effort like this one ...

-- John R

I'd love to see the whole Woolley-Hand bunch get back to activity.  Talossa needs everyone on board, including myself.

And to be clear re myself, I'm doing a lot of work on old Clark archives.  More about that soon(TM).
#125
Wittenberg / Re: New Citizens Information Packet
January 20, 2022, 05:21:33 PM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 19, 2022, 09:07:45 PM
I hope to look at AD's draft during the weekend

I've made a few edits, already.  Nice work so far, Alexandreu!
#126
Wittenberg / Re: New Citizens Information Packet
January 17, 2022, 07:47:26 AM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 16, 2022, 02:00:22 PM
Not impressed with what GV wrote which is almost identical to what KR1 wrote 20 years ago. I think we should try to do better than that.

Look, basically I tried to write the Packet all by myself (from Francal's) notes, earlier this year, and it utterly burned me out. If this is going to be done I need volunteers to help. Anyone interested is free to make suggestions.

I figured adapting Ben's verbiage (with appropriate credit to him) was the way to go.
#127
Wittenberg / Re: Seneschal On Leave - COVID
January 14, 2022, 12:15:40 AM
I am a Christian, a patriot, and am in full agreement with our esteemed PM.  Get the vaccine.  And do what I did on Tuesday and get the booster.

Healing vibes to you, Txoteu...
#128
Wittenberg / Re: Happy new year 2022
January 12, 2022, 09:34:08 PM
Feliz anno nouvelle, Max!
#129
Quote from: xpb on January 09, 2022, 12:34:58 PM
Quote from: GV on January 09, 2022, 06:35:02 AM
Quote from: xpb on January 07, 2022, 01:58:13 PM
Quote from: GV on January 07, 2022, 07:29:40 AM
I will never, ever have time to do the deep-dives necessary to bring the histories of individual provinces to life, not even for Fiova and Maricopa.

I would love for one or more people in each province to step up and do this historical research on their own.

There's a bit in the Cézembre Administrative Guide but I will endeavor to assemble more.

Thank you for that, but what about the date-scheme I cited at the top of this thread?
If you are referencing when l'Etats meets then:
Article 10. L'Etats shall have power to pass any bill into law by a simple majority vote of its Voting Members. Le Sénéchal s hall send out a notification of voting period, of at least seven days. Each member shall have a prescribed amount of time in which to cast his vote (by email, telephone or forum post) before voting closes.
I have typically extended this to at least a fortnight.

If you mean a general history I will delve into that as well.

I refer exclusively to national elections and Clarks.  I literally do not care right now about provincial history, but I can make you a deputy Royal Archivist for getting your province's stuff in order.  More jobs for the Jobs Board, I guess...  lol

Thanks so much for your interest!
#130
Quote from: xpb on January 07, 2022, 01:58:13 PM
Quote from: GV on January 07, 2022, 07:29:40 AM
I will never, ever have time to do the deep-dives necessary to bring the histories of individual provinces to life, not even for Fiova and Maricopa.

I would love for one or more people in each province to step up and do this historical research on their own.

There's a bit in the Cézembre Administrative Guide but I will endeavor to assemble more.

Thank you for that, but what about the date-scheme I cited at the top of this thread?
#131
I will never, ever have time to do the deep-dives necessary to bring the histories of individual provinces to life, not even for Fiova and Maricopa.

I would love for one or more people in each province to step up and do this historical research on their own.
#132
From time to time, I may post 'research questions' to Witt for Talossans to answer.  This is one of those times and the first of same.  Many thanks for your help in advance!

1. The Clark has always been voted on the 1st through the 21st of the month so specified.
2. Cosa Elections for many years were voted on the 15th of one month, ending on the 14th of the month following.  A few years ago, legislation changed that voting window to the 1st through 14th of a single month. 

Are these things correct, and if 2. is correct, what legislation was it that made that change?

Many thanks!

GV, RArchivist
#133
Wittenberg / Re: New Citizens Information Packet
January 06, 2022, 09:37:22 PM
Actually, this is a nice stress-test for the software.  Lüc, your work on this continues to amaze.

Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on January 06, 2022, 08:29:28 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 06, 2022, 07:45:10 PM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on January 06, 2022, 07:33:18 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 06, 2022, 06:05:50 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil on January 06, 2022, 05:53:12 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 06, 2022, 05:50:07 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil on January 06, 2022, 05:41:22 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 06, 2022, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil on January 06, 2022, 03:58:55 PM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 06, 2022, 03:34:50 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil on January 06, 2022, 02:40:16 PM
How exactly do seats get divvied up in the Cosa? Like...I see people with multiple seats, and that just doesn't compute (though I have been following legislative discussions and that's one reason I'm a fan of the Direct Cosa, lol)

Okay: the Cosa is a strict proportional representation system, right? So, 200 seats, party X wins 15 percent of the vote, they get 30 seats.

After that, within a few special rules, parties can give any number of seats to whomever they like with a few restrictions:

- they can't give more than 1/3 of their seats to people who weren't on their list of candidates;
- there's a maximum number of seats any individual is allowed to hold which depends on total turnout (right now I believe that maximum is 28).

I should point out that these restrictions are relatively recent. In the 1980s, a party leader who won an absolute majority of seats could hold all those seats himself and basically thus be the Cosa all by himself. And when that person was the King, it meant rule by decree. I'm serious, if you'll read the old histories, King Robert I would "convene the Cosa" by himself in his bedroom and announce new laws to the masses in his next newsletter.

After that change, it was a struggle to implement party lists. Before those were implemented, parties could give seats to whomever; meaning not only did the voters have zero control over who got a vote in the Cosa, but there was a tradition whereby the ruling party recruited new citizens "fresh off the boat" by giving them Cosa seats. Talk about a self-perpetuating oligarchy.

This whole system is one of those botch-job compromises which only exist because of a stalemate between reformists and traditionalists. Any other questions?
I knew it was PR, the rest of the info was more what I was looking for. Thank you!

Other questions...I see there's been discussion on the monarchy and activity and whatnot. Would you say Talossa has a fairly notable republican current?

Miestra herself is one of the longtime proponents of a republic, and there actually was a Republic of Talossa for many years. It formed when something like half of all active citizens grew outraged over the behavior of the then-king, Robert I. For a long time, there were two Talossas. Eventually, however, the two countries merged back together again. In recognition of their longtime cultural identity and contributions, a new province was created from voluntary cessions of existing provinces to make Fiova, and this process was considered to be a merger of equals. In the years since, some of these citizens and other new ones have continued the pursuit of a new Republic. There has actually been considerable effort just recently along those lines, with a proposal for a regularly elected president (The office would still be called "king," though, and would still have the same powers for now, so proponents of the change argue that this means it would basically be the same monarchy. I disagree, but it's a live argument and their perspective will be different.)

It remains to be seen what's going to happen in the future! If you immigrate, you can be a part of helping decide our future!
I did know of the Republic's existence — I've actually been trying to figure out for a week now how I think "Reunision" is properly pronounced, haha

Not that I'm a citizen yet, of course — and bearing in mind I would stand to benefit from such a change — but I think the idea of some Cosa seats for new citizens is a good one.

As far as the executive goes, I'll admit I've long thought of a directory as a good form of republic, but that's just my opinion.

Like so many things, Reunision started off as a typo. But it's one of the quirks of our country that people will often joyfully seize on small mistakes like that and turn them into traditions!

What do you mean when you speak about a directorate? Do you mean like the thing they had in revolutionary France? I don't know enough about political science to be sure I'm getting the reference.
That is actually where they get the name! A good current example is Switzerland. Their seven-member Federal Council serves as a collective Head of State and a Cabinet.

The Republic of Talossa had more of a French model, maybe. They had a parliamentary government with a president. I think that's what they have in France, anyway.

Some of our provinces effectively operate the way you're suggesting, though, with every interested citizen effectively comprising both an executive and legislative body. I don't think that there are any with a fixed number of members, though.
Can we change the settings so that the number of quoted messages is limited by default, like it was on ProBoards? This is getting out of hand.
What's getting out of hand?  Oh, the number of nested quotes?

Maybe there is a limit and we just haven't hit it yet.
Perhaps.
#134
Wittenberg / Re: New Citizens Information Packet
January 06, 2022, 01:56:07 PM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 06, 2022, 01:40:48 PM
Okay, by the grace of Allà we have a couple of prospectives in the pipeline. As Interior Minister, and for the purposes of research on this topic, I would like to ask them both: what would you like to know from us about how Talossa works? and if/when you become a citizen, what would you like to do first?

Ask them.  Ask them now.  Shall I ask them?
#135
Wittenberg / Re: New Citizens Information Packet
January 05, 2022, 09:03:36 PM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on January 05, 2022, 07:09:04 PM
I was thinking the same thing LOL

1996 was a different time lol.  A bit of my Talossan mind is still stuck in summer 2000 when I first showed up.  The country really was unrecognizable compared to the better society we have now.