*I deleted my prior response because i'm on my phone and confused threads.
But to say precedent has no relevance in civil is nonsense.
The UK Supreme Court was literally created by statute.
Only if the constitution grants the Legislature the exclusive right to do so.
Show me where in the Org Law the Ziu has the power, let alone exclusice power, to regulate the CpI.
Show me where in the Org Law the Ziu has the power to regulate the CpI.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on April 28, 2023, 08:41:29 AMQuote from: Viteu on April 28, 2023, 08:25:34 AMBut there is jurisprudence constante.Which isn't binding, so it's nowhere near as important.
But to say precedent has no relevance in civil is nonsense.
QuoteQuoteI WILL SCREAM THIS FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK--IF YOUR LEGISLATURE CAN ABOLISH YOUR HIGHEST COURT AT THE WHIM OF A SIMPLE MAJORITY, YOU DO NOT HAVE AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY.Well I don't know how the UK handles this, but in countries with constitutions the highest court is usually outlined in the constitution, so abolishing it takes more than a simple majority.
The UK Supreme Court was literally created by statute.
QuoteI don't know how that's relevant to the topic though. The legislature still has the (exclusive!) power to change civil and criminal procedure codes as it sees fit, just like with all other laws.
Only if the constitution grants the Legislature the exclusive right to do so.
Show me where in the Org Law the Ziu has the power, let alone exclusice power, to regulate the CpI.
QuoteQuoteAlso, the separation of powers is rooted in civil law. I don't know why you lot cannot grasp that the civil law-common law question is just an excuse to not bothering to read the Org Law or understand it.Separation of powers doesn't mean that the courts are above the law, or that the legislature mustn't make laws legislating court procedures. Again how is this relevant?
Show me where in the Org Law the Ziu has the power to regulate the CpI.