Quote from: mximo on July 06, 2025, 03:51:42 PMLouis Riel faced Parliamentary censure for his role in the Red River Rebellion, and was expelled from Parliament 16 April 1874.[11]

Lol the guys was kill by pendaison to protect is land...from English colonisation of Metis Land.
He is a national hero now...

This is what you have...

Old case...

No one use censure in Canada since then...

BTW the King is our figure head of stade without power but the constitution of 1867 still give him all the power. Their is something call ''Constitutionnelle convention '' where the law is still their but no one use it anymore...

But if something wrong happen go to the police and ask for an investigation.

I'm pretty busy now...

Do as you wish...

Mximo Carbonèl

Just last year, the Canadian House of Commons passed a bill to censure the developers of an app for ArriveCan: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/arrivecan-contempt-parliament-1.7167513

They call it contempt of Parliament, but it's exactly the same thing.

I do think if you'll investigate the facts of the case, or look back at when you were told about them, you might see our motivation here. Breneir engaged in conduct that was wrong and gross but not criminal. That's why this bill doesn't impose any penalties or do anything besides express the opinion of our Ziu. That would be a bill of attainder, and illegal under the OrgLaw.

You're always talking yourself down, but a lot of people think you're great. You're a pretty smart guy.

If you want to try learning, I think that the lessons are pretty good so far. Start with lesson one and tell me how you do. Let me know if you need any help or if I made any mistakes!

Well, you're doing a great job.  Thank you.

Side note: the site is now averaging about 2,000 unique visitors a month -- and rising all the time!  A lot of people are interested in Talossan, it turns out.

Got a good start on it tonight.

https://talossan.net/lesson-four/

What did the Scribe say when you asked his opinion about this?

@Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC , I believe the third lesson is all set and approved.

https://talossan.net/lesson-three/

I anticipate the fourth lesson will be much easier to write.

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 05:52:43 PMThe table hasn't updated yet on my end, but the exercise is correct.

Weird, it should be correct now with the better list you gave.  Well, I'll check from a different IP later to see if it's still wrong to others.

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 05:56:24 PMIn Lesson One, you're translating "ran" into "coriarha" (future tense) in the second and third extra exercises, it should be "corieva" like in the first.

Also, Lesson One translates "horse" as "caval" while Lesson Three uses "aic" instead. Both are correct, but it might be confusing to beginners if left unexplained.

EDIT: You also don't explain à + el > àl, only à + la > àl, that too might be confusing.

Fixed, thanks!  Wow, you went back and checked them all!

Also, if possible, would you make sure my extra practice questions are all correct?  Should be a pretty easy thing to check.

And if that's all correct, then I think we're set with this lesson!

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 05:33:15 PMAh, no, acute accents never show up word-finally, and grave accents only ever show up word-finally (except in the word àl).

Oh, I really thought there were some... huh, okeydokey!  Thanks!

Fixed the chart, then.  Does it look correct now?  And is the exercise after it correct?

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 05:11:39 PMWhat do you mean?

I mean I know that there's functionally no difference between the two, but I thought there were words that ended in each? Maybe I'm mistaken?

I'm just imagining excluding one or the other from this chart, and having someone wondering why it's missing.

I know that é and è are the same, but aren't there words that end in both?

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 10:27:35 AMYour pluralisation table is missing 1st declension nouns ending in stressed vowels, which actually makes the exercise afterwards impossible:

The singular of "lapins" isn't "lapin" (so looking it up on Översteir won't give you any results), but rather "lapì". These types of nouns are often enough that they should be accounted for.

Okay, I think that I have fixed it.  There's really no way to know which version of the first declension it might be, right?  It could be either lapin or lapì, if you don't actually know the word.  So if you're learning, you just have to look them each up and see which one is right.  Unless I missing a trick here?

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 05, 2025, 10:27:35 AMAs for the complexity of it all: this (along with pronunciation and stress placement) is the type of thing I've always struggled with the most when making learning materials: all the complexity is front-loaded. In a way I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who's struggling.

Yeah, it's really hard, especially if you're new to languages and the idea of declensions (or even "irregular" words).

I'm trying to make it as simple as possible with the charts, since I know that many people run into a wall of text and exceptions and so on and then just deflate.

Next lesson is going to be more practice with those charts, for that reason, to make the tool as familiar as possible.  (Once I get it to actually be right, that is.  My expertise is in teaching, not in languages.  Thank you again for your help!)

I think if I ever wrote a long speech about a case, and included the sentence, "I do not know the facts of the case," I might pause.

Oh, right! Thank you. That's the problem with starting something and then finishing it like 2 months later: you lose track of what you were doing.

Okay, I'll take another run at fixing it up.