I don't want this to be point which torpedoes the bill so I want to ask @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB ,as the proposer of that change, for suggestions to accommodate the concerns of Uc and Ian.

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 17, 2023, 10:56:45 AMThe issues are still those explained by Senator @Ian Plätschisch:

Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on March 11, 2023, 08:42:12 PMMy point has been the time consuming part of this is not the part where the Minister types a report, it's the part where they do the review, which must be done whether or not a report is issued. Sorry that I did not make this distinction clear.

Suggestion: add to the data on immigration on the Infoteca aslo the provinces the immigrants were assigned to, in order to have informations on which province get new immigrants. In this way every data is readily available and is not necessary to do a law mandated review to gather those data.

Of course any Minister of Immingration can do whichever review they seems fit anytime, there's no need for requiring by law a time-consuming review that could be useless.

I agree, it is true that the Immigration Minister can do a review at anytime. You are referring to the status quo and it has repeatedly led to ad-hoc and haphazard reviews of the catchment areas such as the one we are currently undergoing.

I am all for expanding Infoteca immigration reporting but I am still opposed to the status quo where we depend on very active citizens to do the work that Government should be required to do. Catchment area review needs to be standardized and predictable.

Quote from: Carlüs Éovart Vilaçafat on April 17, 2023, 09:00:59 AMThis is wonderful news! The real question is who is... what are you going to wear!?
My vote is for the King Ben Special:

That kingly attire is grand  ;D But I am planning on wearing the Seneschal's chain of office. I can tell you it is appropriately heavy...

@Bråneu Excelsio Minister Excelsio, I am very pleased to report Audrada Roibeardet has expressed a wish for her drink reimbursement ($12) to be donated to the BHAID! I'll be transmitting via Paypal soon.

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 16, 2023, 03:59:43 PM

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 13, 2023, 10:31:55 AMI oppose the reporting/reviewing requirement you brought back in the encouraging language only when the bill arrived to the CRL to address Alexandreu concerns that can - and are - resolved by the simpler section he proposed (with the correction I made).

It seems like I have to repeat myself... We do have issues with reporting/reviewing requirements in that law.

What are the issues with the proposal from @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB ?

Quick update: I have received the recording of the Baron and Ian's second entry in their show The Dialogue. I am planning to have this posted on Fora Talossa within the next few days.

And I want to express my heartfelt appreciation to @Audrada Roibeardet for a wonderful conversation today. In thirty minutes we covered favorite books to favorite foods. That will be posted this coming week as well!

Quote from: Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu on April 11, 2023, 06:04:07 PMRZ5 Con
RZ6 Con
RZ7 Con
RZ8 Con
RZ9 Con
RZ10 Aus

Quote from: Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu on March 29, 2023, 06:13:06 PMEnthusiastically approve.  Clark it.

@Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu Senator, I wanted to ask what caused you to change your mind concerning the Land Acknowledgment Act? I was under the impression as I have quoted above that you approved of the bill.

As the Government pledged in the Throne Speech, I just officially registered for MicroCon 2023 after getting clearances for work vacation time and personal budgeting. This will be the Kingdom's first attendance at the micronational conference since 2017.

Azul Coletx,

As the new Bureau for Humanitarian Aid & International Assistance (BHAID) Administrator, Foreign Affairs Minister Excelsio has authorised me to request a new organisational symbol. The BHAID is also nearing its ten-year anniversary so I thought it would be good for the organization to flesh out its personality as one of Talossa longer standing agencies.

Please let me know if there is a better venue for this request.

Breneir

Thanks again @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB
This suggested edit has been entered into the bill currently in the CRL thread.

Citizens,

I am announcing my resignation as Grefieir d'Abbavilla. There have been some warm-hearted concerns expressed about the toll the wide array of responsibilities I have taken on may take personally. I have heard them and taken them to heart. To remain focused on the most important priorities and discharge my responsibilities with competence and respect for the people I will leave this role to be assumed by someone else.

I assume I will be in a caretaker status until a new appointment is made. I share this notification with the Avocat-Xheneral @Baron Alexandreu Davinescu

Thank you,
Breneir

Quote from: Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB on April 13, 2023, 01:41:18 PM

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on March 11, 2023, 08:06:19 PMA new section 7.13 is added as follows:

Quote7.13 The Ministry of Immigration is encouraged to review catchment areas for potential updates no less than every five (5) years.

What if you said in this section something more like "The Ministry of Immigration shall review catchment areas and propose updates to the Ziu if required every even numbered Cosa." or something more like that? Ambiguity in laws is probably not a good way to go.

Thank you @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB
@Baron Alexandreu Davinescu and Uc any objections to this proposal?

Change made. Any other folks have suggestions for revisions before this is clarked.

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 13, 2023, 11:03:00 AM

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 13, 2023, 10:46:57 AM

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 13, 2023, 10:31:55 AMI oppose the reporting/reviewing requirement you brought back in the encouraging language only when the bill arrived to the CRL to address Alexandreu concerns that can - and are - resolved by the simpler section he proposed (with the correction I made).

Thank you for clarifying.

Wasn't that clear enough on the 30th of March?

I will take that as a sideways yes...

Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on April 13, 2023, 10:31:55 AMI oppose the reporting/reviewing requirement you brought back in the encouraging language only when the bill arrived to the CRL to address Alexandreu concerns that can - and are - resolved by the simpler section he proposed (with the correction I made).

Thank you for clarifying.
Are you saying that you can support the bill with the Baron's suggestion replacing the current 7.13?
If that is the case then while I would prefer the review requirement be explicit I will take on that revision and remove the current 7.13.