With awareness of the ongoing case of Cjantscheir v. Ziu, the Green Party expresses its concern that a positive outcome for the plaintiff would set an example where we allow members of the judiciary to fail to uphold their duties without consequence and that this could lead to further repeated delays or outright dysfunction by a vital institution of Talossan governance. Should 60RZ19 be determined to be inOrganic based on what appears to be a drafting or Scribing error, restore an official who clearly failed in their duties,
and then after that restoration the official continue to fail in their duties then we will be left with little choice to seek the remedy mentioned in
Organic Law, Article VIII, Section 5:
Quote...In the event that a sitting Judge of the Cort pü Inalt acts in a manner that offends the Ziu in the Judge's official and individual capacity, or is found guilty or has pleaded guilty to a crime in Talossa, a member of the Ziu may move for a Notice of Reprimand, which shall set forth an individual charge with the stated punishment contained therein, which shall not exceed removal from his or her seat as Judge.
To impose the sanction of removal, a Notice of Reprimand must receive, in addition to requirements of other legislation, two-thirds support in the Cosa and majority support in the Senate.
We will be drafting legislation to clarify this matter as well, hopefully, in cooperation with other parties. And will be prepared to submit any notices of reprimand necessary to prevent further instances of inactivity in our Corts.