Wittenberg

54RZ25 Judiciary Amendment of 2020 amended the Organic Law, Article VIII: The Courts, as follows:

QuoteSection 4.
...Unless otherwise set by law, re-appointment shall be deemed automatic if no member of the Ziu has requested a re-appointment vote in the Cosa immediately preceding the expiration of the Judge's term; and re-appointment shall only require a simple majority of each house in the Ziu. The Ziu may modify the foregoing provided the requirements of re-appointment never exceed that for appointment.

Judge Istefan Perþonest's appointment to the Uppermost Cort was approved via 55RZ17 the Elevating Istefan Perþonest to the UC Act in January 2021.

Seeing as we are nearing the period for the automated re-appointment I, as a member of the Ziu under Article VIII, Section 4, am requesting an official re-appointment vote.

@Sir Lüc Mr. Secretary, please let me know if I am too early or if the Ziu has at some point modified these provisions.

Also, a minor note for the Scribe, there is a double shall in the fourth whereas clause of 54RZ25.

Yes, a reappointment vote would be within the rules given that we are indeed "in the Cosa immediately preceding the expiration of the Judge's term", with all likelihood.

To this effect, I suggest you Hopper a simple resolution ending with the following clause:

QuoteWHEREAS, (...),

THEREFORE, (we the Ziu etc etc), hereby re-appoint Judge Istefan Éovart Perþonest to a seat on the Uppermost Court, pursuant to the provisions of Organic Law Article VIII Section 4.

or somesuch.

I would additionally like to clarify that, pursuant to Lexh.H.2.1.2.4., such a resolution would not be subject to CRL review.

Quote from: Sir Lüc on June 11, 2025, 03:32:32 AMYes, a reappointment vote would be within the rules given that we are indeed "in the Cosa immediately preceding the expiration of the Judge's term", with all likelihood.

To this effect, I suggest you Hopper a simple resolution ending with the following clause:

QuoteWHEREAS, (...),

THEREFORE, (we the Ziu etc etc), hereby re-appoint Judge Istefan Éovart Perþonest to a seat on the Uppermost Court, pursuant to the provisions of Organic Law Article VIII Section 4.

or somesuch.

I would additionally like to clarify that, pursuant to Lexh.H.2.1.2.4., such a resolution would not be subject to CRL review.

Thanks Mr. Secretary

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on June 10, 2025, 09:16:34 PMAlso, a minor note for the Scribe, there is a double shall in the fourth whereas clause of 54RZ25.

I appreciate the notification -- it would appear that this bill (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=98.0), way back when, was actually proposed, clarked, and adopted as such. Luckily, as a part of the bill's preamble, it bears no legal weight.