Wittenberg

Las Provinçuns/The Provinces => Belacostă => Topic started by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on August 06, 2025, 04:26:18 PM

Title: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on August 06, 2025, 04:26:18 PM
Upon the recommendations of Consuls Autófil and Taiwos, the following is submitted to the Provincial Assembly. Voting shall last for one week from today, to end at 4:25 p.m. Talossan Daylight Time, Wednesday, August 13, 2025/XLVI. Under Article VII of the Constitution of Belacostă, a two-thirds vote in favor by the Provincial Assembly shall be required for passage of constitutional amendments. Should at least four MPAs vote either in favor or against before the deadline, voting will automatically close, as the fate of the bill will be sealed.

Members of the Provincial Assembly are hereby notified of the open vote:
@Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be
@Sir Lüc
@Iason Taiwos
@paolo.mellere
@Dien Xhorxh
@Istefan Perþonest

WHEREAS, the Constitution of Belacostă does not currently appear to allow voters to name fewer than three choices for Provincial Council elections on their ballot; and

WHEREAS, this risks of disenfranchising citizens who do not wish to name three candidates, for whatever reason they may have, or are unaware that undervoting may invalidate their ballot, then

BE IT RESOLVED by the Provincial Assembly of Belacostă that Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of Belacosta, which currently reads as:
QuoteThe Provincial Council will be elected from among the citizens of the Province at each Cosă election, via a positional vote. Voters will name their first-, second-, and third-choice candidates. For each first-choice vote, the candidate shall receive three points; for each second-choice vote, two points; and for each third-place vote, one point. The three candidates with the highest point totals shall be elected to the Provincial Council, with any ties being broken by the number of first-choice votes received (and if necessary, the number of second- and then third-choice votes, with a coin flip being used past this if necessary). Provincial Consuls may choose to ceremonially represent any canton or sexteir of the Province, or to represent the Province at-large.

is hereby amended to read:
QuoteThe Provincial Council will be elected from among the citizens of the Province at each Cosă election, via a positional vote. Voters may name up to three candidates, in order of their preference. For each first-choice vote, the candidate shall receive three points; for each second-choice vote, two points; and for each third-place vote, one point. The three candidates with the highest point totals shall be elected to the Provincial Council, with any ties being broken by the number of first-choice votes received (and if necessary, the number of second- and then third-choice votes, with a coin flip being used past this if necessary). Provincial Consuls may choose to ceremonially represent any canton or sexteir of the Province, or to represent the Province at-large.
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on August 06, 2025, 04:27:23 PM
MemberPër    Con    Aus   
AutófilX
da Schir
Taiwos
PerþonestX
Xhorxh
dal Cräpscaßada   
Total200
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on August 06, 2025, 04:27:35 PM
I cast my vote Për.
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Istefan Perþonest on August 06, 2025, 06:51:05 PM
Për.
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on August 19, 2025, 12:43:33 PM
The voting period having closed, the amendment passes without opposition and is presented before His Majesty the King and the Viceroy for their approval.

@King Txec
@Glüc
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on September 04, 2025, 11:10:45 AM
August ended without action by anyone vested with royal authority. Under the precedent set during the years of King John that Organic amendments fall under the same conditions as regular bills regarding royal inaction, I hold that this bill has passed into law.

Because Article VII of the Belacostan Constitution does not require referenda for constitutional amendments, it therefore takes effect immediately.
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: King Txec on September 04, 2025, 01:12:09 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on September 04, 2025, 11:10:45 AMAugust ended without action by anyone vested with royal authority. Under the precedent set during the years of King John that Organic amendments fall under the same conditions as regular bills regarding royal inaction, I hold that this bill has passed into law.

Because Article VII of the Belacostan Constitution does not require referenda for constitutional amendments, it therefore takes effect immediately.

My apologies on this. I was waiting on my Cunstaval but I also didn't circle back to double check.

-Txec R
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on September 04, 2025, 02:37:10 PM
Quote from: King Txec on September 04, 2025, 01:12:09 PM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on September 04, 2025, 11:10:45 AMAugust ended without action by anyone vested with royal authority. Under the precedent set during the years of King John that Organic amendments fall under the same conditions as regular bills regarding royal inaction, I hold that this bill has passed into law.

Because Article VII of the Belacostan Constitution does not require referenda for constitutional amendments, it therefore takes effect immediately.

My apologies on this. I was waiting on my Cunstaval but I also didn't circle back to double check.

-Txec R

Not a problem, Your Majesty. It's a busy time of year for you, if I'm not mistaken!
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: King Txec on September 04, 2025, 03:04:36 PM
Indeed it is! I'm plum exhausted most of the time right now!

-Txec R
Title: Re: [ASSEMBLY] - The Undervoting Question Amendment
Post by: Glüc on September 05, 2025, 07:11:57 AM
Sincerest apologies for missing another one of these. I wanted to have another look at what exactly rules are for passing amendments when there's no referendum, but then I forgot again. It's getting embarrassing.

Anyway, needless to say I wouldn't have vetoed. I'm glad that the inconsistency between the BUS and the constitution has been resolved