Wittenberg

Ziu, Governamaintsch es Cadinerïă / Ziu, Government and Judiciary => El Ziu/The Ziu => Topic started by: Sir Lüc on April 23, 2026, 09:29:36 AM

Title: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Sir Lüc on April 23, 2026, 09:29:36 AM
The call for bills for the May 2026 Clark (the fourth of the 62nd Cosă) is now open. You may post a link to a bill's Hopper thread underneath in the usual fashion, provided it has passed the Hopper according to Lex.H.2 and you are entitled to Clark bills.

ATTENTION: unfortunately we have yet another Clark beginning on a Day With Plans (New Year's Day, then two Sundays, and now May Day). This time around, my plans will prevent me from being able to make the Clark in the European morning of May 1st as I usually do, so I will have to receive all bills by the European evening of April 30th and assemble everything then.

Therefore, I will accept for Clarking any such bills (except for any that fall foul of H.2.7) that are presented between now and April 30th 11:59 AM TDT, or 12 hours earlier than usual.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 23, 2026, 11:31:46 AM
S:r Secretary,

I am Clarking the following: The Sentient Rights Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4591.0)
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 23, 2026, 01:03:08 PM
S:r Secretary,

I'd also like to Clark the following: Sense of the Ziu: In Support of Decoloniality (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=5153.new#new)
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 28, 2026, 02:33:45 PM
S:r Secretary,

I would like to reClark the following:

BHAID: Humanitarian Assistance to Sudan Resolution: https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4993.msg41750#new
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on April 28, 2026, 02:59:06 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 23, 2026, 11:31:46 AMS:r Secretary,

I am Clarking the following: The Sentient Rights Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4591.0)
Just FYI: this bill should not be accepted under the terms of Lexh.H.2.1.7.1, since it is too deficient in function to work.  In the time since it was proposed and placed in the CRL, that section of the law was amended by an intervening bill, and so it's proposing to amend a provision that does not exist.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 28, 2026, 03:47:49 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on April 28, 2026, 02:59:06 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 23, 2026, 11:31:46 AMS:r Secretary,

I am Clarking the following: The Sentient Rights Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4591.0)
Just FYI: this bill should not be accepted under the terms of Lexh.H.2.1.7.1, since it is too deficient in function to work.  In the time since it was proposed and placed in the CRL, that section of the law was amended by an intervening bill, and so it's proposing to amend a provision that does not exist.

Thanks so much! I have updated the El Lex amending references to account for The Blanking Blank Act.
@Sir Lüc S:r Secretary, please let me know if these changes prevent it from being Clarked and I will hold off until the fifth Clark.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be on April 29, 2026, 11:21:40 PM
@Sir Lüc , please forgive the early tag; as I will be travelling tomorrow for a funeral I may not be on Witt much. However, in the event the CRL does not inappropriately delay the Freedom of Conscience Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=5046.0) outside their limited scope of responsibility, I would ask that you add it to the Clark once it receives the requisite approval.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Mximo Malt on April 30, 2026, 06:54:03 AM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on April 29, 2026, 11:21:40 PM@Sir Lüc , please forgive the early tag; as I will be travelling tomorrow for a funeral I may not be on Witt much. However, in the event the CRL does not inappropriately delay the Freedom of Conscience Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=5046.0) outside their limited scope of responsibility, I would ask that you add it to the Clark once it receives the requisite approval.

Rest eternal to your loved one.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Sir Lüc on April 30, 2026, 09:39:58 AM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 28, 2026, 03:47:49 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on April 28, 2026, 02:59:06 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on April 23, 2026, 11:31:46 AMS:r Secretary,

I am Clarking the following: The Sentient Rights Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4591.0)
Just FYI: this bill should not be accepted under the terms of Lexh.H.2.1.7.1, since it is too deficient in function to work.  In the time since it was proposed and placed in the CRL, that section of the law was amended by an intervening bill, and so it's proposing to amend a provision that does not exist.

Thanks so much! I have updated the El Lex amending references to account for The Blanking Blank Act.
@Sir Lüc S:r Secretary, please let me know if these changes prevent it from being Clarked and I will hold off until the fifth Clark.

No, it's good to go on this Clark. The changes are minor enough.
Title: Re: [CHANCERY] Call for Bills for the May 2026 Clark
Post by: Sir Lüc on April 30, 2026, 09:40:38 AM
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on April 29, 2026, 11:21:40 PM@Sir Lüc , please forgive the early tag; as I will be travelling tomorrow for a funeral I may not be on Witt much. However, in the event the CRL does not inappropriately delay the Freedom of Conscience Act (https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=5046.0) outside their limited scope of responsibility, I would ask that you add it to the Clark once it receives the requisite approval.

That's a reasonable ask under these circumstances. My deepest condolences.