Quote from: Viteu on May 15, 2023, 10:28:38 PMQuote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 15, 2023, 10:08:44 PMQuote from: Viteu on May 15, 2023, 10:07:01 PM90 people participated in the election by voting, therefore the number is 90.
No.
Abstaining is by its very nature non-participation.
The fact that it establishes that the voter was present does not change that.
No. If Abstention means participation for the purpose of two-strike, then it necessarily means participation in the referendum.
Not sorry, but your org law failed. And Miestra tried to hide it, like she took a few months to report CCX. After all, she sat on that since February.
This was an unfair accusation from V. I am researching the events for an Abbavilla Digest special.
Please don't necropost (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/necropost) on threads this old; six months old is bad but tolerable, three years is way too old. I suppose it's not explicitly discouraged by Wittiquette, but it makes historical research much more difficult when threads are suddenly heavily out of order.
--SoS
Quote from: Sir Lüc on Today at 06:06:12 PMPlease don't necropost (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/necropost) on threads this old; six months old is bad but tolerable, three years is way too old. I suppose it's not explicitly discouraged by Wittiquette, but it makes historical research much more difficult when threads are suddenly heavily out of order.
--SoS
Thank you for advising on this, Luc. Would it be better for me to request a split beforehand rather than make the post? Or if someone could help me with how to do it? As you mentioned this is not a breach of any etiquette rules but I do not want to make historical research more difficult. I am currently doing exactly that on Old Witt.