I understand that this bill, as posted here, was part of a larger bill that was regularly Hoppered and later broken up.
My vote doesn't make a difference at this point, but in my mind this piece of legislation was never Hoppered and, while it has no issues in form, the CRL shouldn't be able to approve a bill that did not go through regular order in the Hopper.
My objection doesn't apply to the Legal Repair Amendment posted in parallel to this, as it shares the name of the original Hoppered bill.
My vote doesn't make a difference at this point, but in my mind this piece of legislation was never Hoppered and, while it has no issues in form, the CRL shouldn't be able to approve a bill that did not go through regular order in the Hopper.
My objection doesn't apply to the Legal Repair Amendment posted in parallel to this, as it shares the name of the original Hoppered bill.