Quote from: GV on May 20, 2021, 09:33:02 PMWhether or not that Act was "obviously broken" depends on who you ask.Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on May 20, 2021, 05:53:57 PM
Well, it was just a couple of days ago that you were flinging names and abuse, shouting that I was just an outrageous troll for pointing out that there was no real compromise... and now it seems you are trying to negotiate one on behalf of your party leader. So please forgive me if I find it hard to take your latest noise seriously.
I remember when the 54th Cosa coalition agreement was announced, it included an agreement that the new Government would pass Ian P's Talossa Is Not Wittenberg Act. Sure enough, it passed. But as soon as there were the votes in the 55th Cosa -- in the very first Clark! -- the Shark Tank Act was passed. So whoever's negotiating this secret agreement: I suggest you try to get better terms than "we agree for exactly as long as we must."
In other words, it's not okay to fix something which is obviously broken? If we keep this logic, we might as well return to the 1979 Constitution.