Well, I should be able to pick it up. I've never worked with Django but have done some work with other frameworks in Python.

I can confirm mine and Bråneu's have been delivered. We have yet to receive them in Mexico, but they are in safe hands.

GV shared the sad news earlier this year:

Quote from: GV on January 13, 2024, 07:46:03 AMhttps://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/florence-yarney-obituary?id=35192717

Florence was a giant of Talossan history, serving as king from 1987-1988 when she abdicated in favor of Ben Madison, who was king again until August 2005.

She actually died in 2022, but when I got a death-anniversary reminder for John Eiffler, I thought to see if anyone else had passed away.  The one I could find is Florence, and the photo in the above obituary matches that I remember from seeing her in Ben's Talossan videos at Ben's coronation in 1988.

From that video and from all accounts, she seemed exactly as the obituary says she was: possessed of a keen and flamboyant style of teaching and much-beloved by all who knew her.

RIP, Florence.  I wish all of us in Talossa (including I) could have known you.

- GV

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 22, 2024, 01:53:07 PMGenerally speaking, I think that people only have ever used Ian I when they were not actually aware of the conventions that are typical. I think we should probably stick with the traditional use, where you would just be King Txec.

I like more your response from here:

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 22, 2022, 04:14:42 PM

Quote from: Danihel Txechescu on January 22, 2022, 03:19:14 PMI thought it was "King John" and not "King John I".

it's both, but the latter is more formal. He's the first King John! He would be the third King Robert, if that were his name, or the second King Florence.

I like that duality of in-/formality.

Here's a good reference on how to create your GPG key on Mac:
https://gpgtools.tenderapp.com/kb/how-to/first-steps-where-do-i-start-where-do-i-begin-setup-gpgtools-create-a-new-key-your-first-encrypted-email

Don't mind the email part, that's not important. What matters here is that you have one GPG key so that you can decrypt files.

Quote from: GV on September 11, 2024, 09:06:09 AM@luc-troubleshooting Where do I go to make Witt and Wiki backups?

Many thanks! - GV, Royal Archivist

We have daily backups (4 per day, in fact) of Witt and the Wiki. They are publicly available but encrypted. If you wish to have access to them please share you public GPG key and I'll add you.

(Pardon the intrusion.)

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on August 26, 2024, 02:48:07 PM[...] Armorial precedent should be observed.  The new king should choose the name of his house [...]

I, for one, would love to have the unveiling of the House as a surprise until the last minute. That'll give the press something to talk about!

I subscribe to these words and wish I could add some of mine to express the immense sorrow these news cause.

Claim.

While the committee still exists, there's been no activity in it as of recently.

As an update from my side, I could not attend the event I planned to on the 20th of February due to my wife forgetting I had something scheduled that day and leaving until very late, thus leaving me with no car. I love her still. Fortunately, a friend and neighbor offered to get me up to speed on that, so that's still a promising option.

In somewhat unrelated news, I have been refining the citizens directory and a related mailing solution, which would constitute the foundation for this.

Yes.

The committee still exists as far as I understand. Not much has been discussed recently. I, for one, was away during the month of January due to choir/church commitments and have only started wake up to 2024. Before that, a basic structure of the citizenship roll was made and deployed, for other services to peruse. I will be attending a meeting on the 20th to know more about a technology (Odoo) that might help us support this initiative.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on December 22, 2023, 05:06:28 PM[...]

Quote from: Danihel Txechescu on December 21, 2023, 08:50:54 PM1. The government will keep more than just Talossa.com.

Is there a "not" missing in this sentence? I was under the impression that talossa.com is the only domain name that the Kingdom still holds. Is this correct or is it not?

Nope. There are 3 domain names owned by the Kingdom:
* talossa.com
* kingdomoftalossa.com
* kingdomoftalossa.org

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on December 22, 2023, 05:06:28 PM

QuoteThe domain Talossan.com was lost due to reasons explained before.

If the Minister is referring to this previous TERP, then I'm afraid that again I don't really understand what happened. What seems to have happened was: the Government could not get in touch with Istefan at the time, so the Government decided not to pay for renewal of the talossan.com domain name with DoRoyal, and therefore it lapsed. Is this correct or is it not?

Yes. That morphed into https://www.talossan.org/. This domain's ownership will be transferred to the Kingdom shortly, so that'll make 4 domains.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on December 22, 2023, 05:06:28 PM

Quote2. Talossan services are not in my private server.

Now I am really confused. I was given to understand by the Secretary of State that - after the problems with DoRoyal - Wittenberg was being hosted on your private server, hence the occasional crashes due to backup problems. If this is not the case, can I please ask the Minister to explain exactly where Wittenberg is currently being hosted?

That is not the case. I have multiple VPS (more than I should) and the Talossan infrastructure is its own virtual private server, apart from other projects. This server is hosted by DigitalOcean in their New York data centers. Both Lüc and I have full access to that server.

As for the occasional service disruptions in the name of data safeguarding, I hope it's appreciated that we avoided a second Wittpocalypse just a few weeks ago, when DoRoyal underwent a severe attack on their infrastructure; we only lost the email boxes and we're in the process of migrating that too.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on December 22, 2023, 05:06:28 PM

QuoteI'm still paying for this bill, so no expenditure expected.

I'm afraid this is a real problem, if true, because this makes Talossa's web presence the private property of the Minister of Technology. What are the Government's plans for returning to a situation where the Kingdom pays for its own webhosting, as mandated in El Lexhatx D.2.8.4 and D.2.9?

I will not be billing the Kingdom for my services for the foreseeable future.

Danihel Txechescu
MinTech

Apologies to all for missing this deadline.

1. The government will keep more than just Talossa.com. The domain Talossan.com was lost due to reasons explained before.
2. Talossan services are not in my private server. I'm still paying for this bill, so no expenditure expected. When anyone decides to migrate things to a different provider, all the data will be available, including bring-up documentation.

DT
MinTech

I thank these questions.

1) I apologize for not sharing the good news earlier, more so to Breneir Tzaracomprada to whom I promised I would share the news. We are now in possession of the Talossa.com domain (in Talossa's account in Namesilo) for which we thank Istefan Perþonest for his quick response in this last transfer attempt. This occurred on October 25th.

2) We do have a plan to move email away from DoRoyal, which is the last bit still there. There is no timeline yet, but we want to move as soon as possible. A test server for email was set up last week, and sending out email was demonstrated successfully. Because I didn't want to disrupt more upon DoRoyal's disruption, I didn't get to test receiving emails, as that would have required changing DNS entries for longer time, but it should work just as well. Next in our testing is setting up a webmail system, like the one we have right now, and that can be done and finalized before we move away entirely.

I might add that the last disruption from DoRoyal did wipe out all of our email aliases and some (if not all) email inboxes. That makes me think that if we had stayed there with our webspace hosting, it would have been gone too. No way to know for sure, but very likely.

Danihel Txechescu
MinTech