**Permanent Witt Location

FT marks the 2nd Flip Molinar Day in the Kingdom, January 1, 2026

---

Quote from: þerxh Sant-Enogat on December 21, 2025, 11:17:31 AMand today, announcement of the appointement of our new Cabinet, on X/Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Instagram, r/Talossa and r/Micronations

@þerxh Sant-Enogat would you be willing to share Fora Talossa's video marking the 2nd Flip Molinar Day on our media channels if there are no objections?

FT marks the 2nd Flip Molinar Day in the Kingdom, January 1, 2026

---

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on December 21, 2025, 02:28:21 PMI second the nomination of @Françal I. Lux as Tuischac'h

With the expected withrawal soon of S:reu Mximo's nomination of Francal Lux. I will nominate Francal Lux outright as Tuischac'h.

I second the nomination of @Françal I. Lux as Tuischac'h

Quote from: þerxh Sant-Enogat on December 21, 2025, 11:49:47 AMWHEREAS our TalossaWiki media contains may pages which are supposed to neutrally and factually detail many aspects of Talossa and its activity, and should not contain politician attacks nor harassment statements

I would recommend the last part of the whereas clause be edited to read as "should not contain political attacks or harassing statements"

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 21, 2025, 12:15:22 PM@Breneir Tzaracomprada , do you still have the chain?  I'd like to have it for the Living Cosa and official oath.

I do, it's still sitting in my closet. PM your address and I will send it off

I recall pleading for this kind of measure (in the Discord) over two years ago and no one seemed to think it was a problem then...glad to see there has been a change in perspective.

I support this bill and will encourage its application not be based on the popularity of the offender or the victim.

I have spoken previously in support of, and proposed legislation, to eliminate the Defence Ministry, and reform the Zouaves into the Kingdom's unconventional defence force. This would have entailed the creation of branched Zouave units such as the Space Zouaves, Land Zouaves, Air Zouaves, Sea Zouaves, and of course the Time Zouaves (Dr. Who being the most famous member).

Quote from: Mximo Malt on December 19, 2025, 03:41:28 PMDo you intend for the Kingdom to sever diplomatic relations with America?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I intend for the Kingdom to register its grave concern with the state of democracy in our neighboring nation.

Mximo you really have to stop stepping on rakes here. If you want people to not think you sympathize with fascists, racists, and antisemites then please do your research before associating yourself with personalities and sayings.

Whereases TBD:

Therefore, the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa enacts the following statutory change. El Lexhatx Section D.2.6.6 through D.2.6.6.3.1 which reads as follows:

Quote2.6.6 The Bureau for Humanitarian Aid and International Development (The Bureau) shall serve as the hub for the Kingdom of Talossa's support for disaster and poverty relief and other forms of humanitarian assistance, emergency response and the promotion of efforts towards socioeconomic development.
2.6.6.1 The Bureau shall operate under the auspices of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Bureau shall be administered by an Administrator to be appointed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
2.6.6.2 The Bureau shall be funded by contributions from individuals, nonprofit organizations and where deemed appropriate by the Ziu, legislative appropriations.
2.6.6.3 The Administrator shall make every effort to ensure that Bureau's funds are donated to humanitarian organizations in a timely manner, and shall notify the public when outgoing donations are made. This notice shall include at least the amount, date, and beneficiary of the outgoing donation(s).
2.6.6.3.1 Other provisions of el Lexhatx notwithstanding, outgoing donations made with money contributed by private parties shall not require the approval of the Ziu.

is deleted in its entirety.

A new section, 1.8 is added under El Lexhatx Section C, to read as follows:

Quote1.8 The Bureau for Humanitarian Aid and International Development (The Bureau) shall serve as the hub for the Kingdom of Talossa's support for disaster and poverty relief and other forms of humanitarian assistance, emergency response and the promotion of efforts towards socio-economic development.
1.8.1 The Bureau shall operate under the auspices of the Royal Civil Service. The Bureau shall be administered by a Permanent Secretary for Humanitarian Aid and International Development to be appointed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
1.8.2 The Bureau shall be funded by contributions from individuals, nonprofit organizations and where deemed appropriate by the Ziu, legislative appropriations.
1.8.3 The Permanent Secretary for Humanitarian Aid and International Development shall make every effort to ensure that the Bureau's funds are donated to humanitarian organizations in a timely manner, and shall notify the public when outgoing donations are made. This notice shall include at least the amount, date, and beneficiary of the outgoing donation(s).
1.8.4 Other provisions of el Lexhatx notwithstanding, outgoing donations made with money contributed by private parties shall not require the approval of the Ziu.

Uréu q'estadra så:
Breneir Tzaracomprada (MC-Green)

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on December 17, 2025, 10:45:13 PMSince it's been mentioned more than once now, I should note that yes, I intend to pursue the Upper House of Review Amendment...

Glad to get confirmation you are moving forward with this.

The Green Party is thankful to the following for stepping up to serve the Kingdom in the Ziu:

Breneir Tzaracomprada - 20 seats
Francesco Manzella - 4 seats @Francesco Manzella
Muhammed Yasir - 4 seats @Muhammed Yasir

This has been one of the ugliest government formation periods I can recall. I am relieved we can finally move forward and see the URL conduct a vigorous opposition. Their shadow cabinet has been announced.

With great relief I observe we are nearing the end of this negotiation phase for the next government.

Now, I hope, there will be a focus on governing by the PA and IDT. And a focus on government accountability by the URL.

Quote from: King Txec on December 16, 2025, 03:05:23 PMI would support removing so-called advisory opinions but it would be useful if someone like the Chancellor or the Bar or some other lawyerly type was available to provide guidance in cases that don't rise to the high bar of the Cort pu Inalt.

-Txec R

I think this is a fantastic idea and I'm wondering if it might be achieved by internal government policy. Assuming the removal of the advisory opinion the alternative advice mechanism might not need additional legislation.

So this trailer just popped up today and when I tell you it is an alien movie directed by Steven Spielberg, you know it won't miss. It is called Disclosure Day and will be released in the US in June 2026:

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 16, 2025, 01:59:57 PMThis change would ensure that a lawsuit could be brought only when there was a live case or controversy. The court would only hear a case if there was some existing problem that they could solve, in other words. I think it's a problem because it makes the judiciary into an ad hoc legislature that is only presented with one side before making their ruling, rather than an adversarial process.

Such a change kind of seems like the opposite of what you were going for, which was expanding the advisory opinion role in which authorized people can just ask the court to rule about something that's not in front of them. So I'm very surprised to hear you say that.

You may find this hard to believe, Alexandreu, but I do find calm, logical arguments persuasive. You presented an alternative which persuaded me.

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 16, 2025, 01:30:02 PMAdvisory opinions should be minimized as much as possible.  In many countries, they are used as a method of ad hoc lawmaking.  I'd prefer advisory opinions be removed completely, and instead use a "case or controversy" standard.

Removing the advisory opinion entirely is an option I had not considered and I would support if it means creating the new approach you describe. I will edit the current proposal to that effect now.