Thank you for your service, and we appreciate you very much. I hope that we'll see more of you socially, if less out of obligation!
Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on March 18, 2022, 05:23:08 PMPROCESS FOR FILING LEGAL BUSINESS
1. Petitions for any business shall be filed by posting a single message containing your petition or by using private messages to send your petition to the Clerk of Corts.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 02:03:23 PMQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 27, 2026, 07:20:14 AMCould you give an example of legislation that's truly vital that we've been unable to pass thanks to the Senäts?
The most recent example was the Public Process Act Mark 1!
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 02:03:23 PMA few years ago, a Free Democrat Senäts majority simply refused to pass *any* TNC government legislation for a time. Regardless of the wisdom of that political tactic*, there was no talk at the time of needing to get the majority of provincial representatives onside. The talk at the time was that this was an illegitimate use of power. Are we to infer that the Senäts' power to thwart the Cosa's will is good only when the Baron considers it for good ends?

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 26, 2026, 12:47:44 AMQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 17, 2026, 04:48:21 PMI note that this bill would make the first sentence of the modified clause a lie. "The Senäts shall have equal powers with the Cosa in respect of all proposed laws" will no longer be true. There will only be two categories of bills for which the Senäts will be equal to the Cosa. That might be something you want to fix.Under your interpretation, the first sentence of the modified clause is already a lie -- the clause goes on to describe a class of bills in which the Senäts is already unequal to the Cosă. I'm interested in hearing what others think about the wording, though.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 26, 2026, 12:47:44 AMThere are a few reasons:
- One, it does not allow truly vital legislation to be hung up forever on the Senäts. Since, of course, bills addressing a given issue can only be considered once per term, this allows the Senäts to effectively kick the can down the road on any issue they wish to obstruct the government on.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 26, 2026, 12:47:44 AM- The more overarching, "philosophical" reason is that Talossa is not a federal nation. I know we've compared our constitutional structure to Australia before -- and in fact I believe @Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC has stated that similarities are intentional -- but the reality is that we are more like Spain than Australia: a unitary state, divided into provinces that may legislate on certain areas on their own. A "strong" upper house (or at least one as strong as the Senäts) is incompatible with the concept of responsible government in a unitary state.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 26, 2026, 12:47:44 AM- This change will also likely lead to a "de-politicization" of Senäts elections, which is healthy if we're trying to make Talossa a more tolerable place for people to spend their time.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 26, 2026, 12:47:44 AM- I know you personally have expressed several points of opposition to unicameralism before, chief among those being a safeguard on excessive Organic amendments. Please note that the requirement of the Senäts' consent is not affected in cases of Organic amendment.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 27, 2026, 12:27:42 AMMy first thought here was some kind of megaphone as a charge, but actually -- and by happy accident aligning with the arms of the incumbent -- what about a trumpet or horn?
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 27, 2026, 12:27:42 AMI actually have two concepts for this one drawn up some time ago:Love it.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 27, 2026, 12:27:42 AMMy question here is what would we replace it with? Not opposed to replacing something insensitive in the slightest, but if we're going to change something, let's make it a good one so people don't have second thoughts down the line. (First thought was some interlocking rings, a stylized chain of sorts? Shared culture is ultimately what binds any group like Talossa together, after all.
Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on January 27, 2026, 12:27:42 AMAdding an item to the list (sorry not sorry) to merge in this discussion and point out that I do have a few other SVGs (Seneschal, Finance, Foreign) I've made to tie everything together with the ARD's recommended shades of green and red. Haven't done the entire Cabinet yet though.

