Congrats and welcome!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.Show posts Menu
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 13, 2024, 09:25:29 PMBE IT ENACTED by the King, Senäts and Cosă in Ziu assembled that the following section shall be added to El Lexhatx A.7.3.1:I would suggest that we open up the definition of 7.3.1 and of the person(s) U18, to not be exclusively Talossan Citizens (or Talossans U18 - as Talossan Citizen, arguably has a more limited & defined definition and excludes, for example perspectives). I am of the viewpoint that when it comes to protecting minors, we shouldn't allow for any 'loophole' to exist in our laws.Quote220.127.116.11. "Sexual violence" shall include abuse of trust, where a Talossan citizen over the age of 18 initiates sexual conduct (physically or by means of words or images) with a Talossan citizen under the age of 18; and the citizen over 18 is in a position of supervision, authority or tutelage over the citizen under 18.
Quote7.3.1. Whoever commits physical or sexual violence or threats thereof against any person or "judicial person" under Talossan law is guilty of a felony.
18.104.22.168. "Sexual violence" shall include abuse of trust, where a Talossan citizen over the age of 18 initiates sexual conduct (physically or by means of words or images) with any person under the age of 18; and the citizen over 18 is in a position of supervision, authority or tutelage over said person under 18.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 06, 2023, 06:10:30 AMOne idea might be to have some Guaïrs that are ex officio examples being some of the following: PM, Leader of the Opposition, SoS, Túischac'h, Mençei, Senior Justice/Justices, Constables etc...Quote from: Sir Lüc on October 06, 2023, 05:48:28 AMQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 05, 2023, 08:59:21 AMI do not think it's a good idea to start the term by reducing the powers of the king.
I think you'd be welcome to privately suggest to John he should consider reviving Cunstavals on his own accord, much like you/he did with the Privy Council, in which case this bill would be entirely moot :)
(Of course, the important matter is that the Privy Council is only useful to him, while Cunstavals (should) perform important Organic functions in their own provinces.)
He actually must have been reading this stuff or heard about it, even though I've been scrambling with too much other stuff to bug him, since he emailed me a couple of nights ago and mentioned his intention to appoint some new cunstavais. The basic problem is 100% correct: we should have active cunstavais. They're one of those things like the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration that just gets overlooked when it comes to regular maintenance and attention, since they don't see that much action.
Really, it's on Txec and I, who should be more on-the-ball about it... monitoring and recommending appointments like that are one of the jobs we're supposed to be doing! The Sabor should maybe get slightly bigger, though, since Txec and I both already have a ton of stuff going on in Talossa. When I first took the position, I wasn't anticipating returning to partisan politics.
I do think there might be good stuff here in this bill and changes we might want to make, though, Luc. I'm going to take XPB's suggestion for now and just agree to disagree for the moment, but this general topic is something we should come back to.