Quote from: Munditenens Tresplet on February 10, 2025, 08:56:54 PMI agree with all the above. I'd also note that I personally see an Aus vote as recording your presence for the purpose of establishing a quorum, so yes, one Per would pass a bill in the presence of such quorum.

This is not an uncommon practice - UK charities, especially member charities, often use this kind of method - though they usually also count it AGAINST the vote on something requiring a formal vote and success threshold (such as election of certain officers). Not suggesting we should do that latter, just citing a parallel

The big upside of Bluesky is that it's not Twitter; the big downside is that it's Bluesky.

Wonderful idea.

Hope to see you when life is in a different place. Praying stuff sorts out.

I was there the first time Alex and Miestra argued...all those millennia ago...the Endless War...

Cosa: PROG

RZ6: CON
RZ21: PER
RZ22: PER

Per

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 22, 2024, 04:28:30 PM

Quote from: owenedwards on January 17, 2024, 08:56:46 PMRe 6.12.2, given a perfectly plausible problem that might arise is that the convicted party is not able to so request (due to external circumstances), he might reasonably claim to have been deprived of the spirit by the letter. Something to consider.

I think the best answer to this is to extend the deadline? To, let's say, 2 months?

Yes, that's a good faith length I think.

I don't know off the top of my head what the Wisconsin Criminal Code - as our great antecedent - says on this (or rather matters like this), but that may be worth a look. This does presume something as to the nature of a position of trust, rendering adults in Talossa analogous to teachers - which I assume if your intent.

Re 6.12.2, given a perfectly plausible problem that might arise is that the convicted party is not able to so request (due to external circumstances), he might reasonably claim to have been deprived of the spirit by the letter. Something to consider.

Rest in peace, rise in glory.

Litz dropped me a line. Apologies for absence. Ruling forthcoming this week.

I like the town meeting model, so I'd suggest going for XPB's proposal on this specific

Cosa: TNC
Senats: Gluc

Referendum: Aus

Excellent work.