@Breneir Tzaracomprada - Any interest?
Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 06, 2023, 06:10:30 AMOne idea might be to have some Guaïrs that are ex officio examples being some of the following: PM, Leader of the Opposition, SoS, Túischac'h, Mençei, Senior Justice/Justices, Constables etc...Quote from: Sir Lüc on October 06, 2023, 05:48:28 AMQuote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 05, 2023, 08:59:21 AMI do not think it's a good idea to start the term by reducing the powers of the king.
I think you'd be welcome to privately suggest to John he should consider reviving Cunstavals on his own accord, much like you/he did with the Privy Council, in which case this bill would be entirely moot :)
(Of course, the important matter is that the Privy Council is only useful to him, while Cunstavals (should) perform important Organic functions in their own provinces.)
He actually must have been reading this stuff or heard about it, even though I've been scrambling with too much other stuff to bug him, since he emailed me a couple of nights ago and mentioned his intention to appoint some new cunstavais. The basic problem is 100% correct: we should have active cunstavais. They're one of those things like the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration that just gets overlooked when it comes to regular maintenance and attention, since they don't see that much action.
Really, it's on Txec and I, who should be more on-the-ball about it... monitoring and recommending appointments like that are one of the jobs we're supposed to be doing! The Sabor should maybe get slightly bigger, though, since Txec and I both already have a ton of stuff going on in Talossa. When I first took the position, I wasn't anticipating returning to partisan politics.
I do think there might be good stuff here in this bill and changes we might want to make, though, Luc. I'm going to take XPB's suggestion for now and just agree to disagree for the moment, but this general topic is something we should come back to.
Quote from: xpb on September 16, 2023, 05:41:31 PMQuote from: Dame Litz Cjantscheir, UrN on September 16, 2023, 04:57:19 PMTechnically speaking the whole ballot is moot given we have only one candidate and CZA9, Section 15, could theoretically have been applied, namely:Quote"15. If there is one sole candidate for the position of Lord Warden at the start of the election, no election will be held and the sole candidate will be considered elected to the position."
However, as XPB has said, no harm in a test run!
A9: The 51st Cosa Lord Warden Election Act
was for a specific election.
A11: The 52nd Cosa Lord Warden Election Act was defeated
there have been no general amendments to the CAG, just these specific ones
Quote"15. If there is one sole candidate for the position of Lord Warden at the start of the election, no election will be held and the sole candidate will be considered elected to the position."