News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Sir Lüc

#61
There's a small thing that needs fixing, D.2.1 doesn't read as it currently stands on the bill, that's only the final sentence. Otherwise I'd say this version works, sign me up.
#62
I would probably replace the old weirdly-worded bit with a broad provision that the Seneschal may perform any official act on behalf of their ministers; and the latter new part with a new, explicit provision that the Seneschal may at any time name a Deputy Minister to be Acting Minister, until the Seneschal or the absentee Minister publicly declare otherwise, or the absentee Minister is dismissed. (The ability of the Seneschal to appoint a Deputy Minister would be implied by the first bit anyway.)
#63
El Funal/The Hopper / Re: BHAID: Effective Altruism Act
February 09, 2024, 04:54:20 AM
Moved out of committee as requested.
#64
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on February 07, 2024, 02:15:42 PMAlso, can this be moved out of the CRL as this seems more appropriate for the Hopper? @Sir Lüc

Do I go ahead with this still?
#65
Anyhow, my opinion is that the bill satisfies the requirements of Lex.D.2.8.3 in form and function.

Is there any particular reason why the louis has been decimalised? Also, very minor note, there's a typo ("Revue") just before the balance changes.
#66
Gladly!

For the record, the process I'm following is to click on "Move Topic", then select the CRL board as destination, do not post a redirection topic, and change the title of the thread to add the [CRL] prefix.

(Ideally, this will be done again when the bill is moved to the Hopper archives.)
#68
I must point out that for some reason the former Seneschal has disappeared from the list of MCs during the second Clark, thus making it seem the VoC failed 81-85 as his 17 seats are missing.
#69
El Funal/The Hopper / Re: A-X CRL Alternates
January 31, 2024, 10:42:12 AM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on January 30, 2024, 01:05:59 PMGood point. Do you think I should remove it as it is redundant? Also, co-sponsor? 😀

Sure! I think the provision is kinda redundant, but also we should probably-eventually-ideally review that other D.2.1 provision so that its meaning and scope get a bit clearer.
#70
El Funal/The Hopper / Re: A-X CRL Alternates
January 30, 2024, 12:20:07 PM
This looks fine to me.

The Seneschal name-drop makes me wonder how this bit of Lex.D.2.1 plays into this situation:

QuoteAccordingly, anything that any Minister can do (officially), the Seneschal may (if he desires) do himself.

This probably means that the Seneschal can not only make the envisaged appointment themselves, but also that they can presently serve on the CRL by performing the duties of the A-X (which is incidentally something I'd already talked about in that note on pre-First Clark CRL operation I re-shared recently)
#71
I have submitted for Clarking the Title H Reorganisation and Correction Act through the database.
#72
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on January 29, 2024, 09:29:15 AMNice, I also have a proposal under review internally by TNC members right now.

I will be glad to work with you on that when it gets Hoppered!
#73
Quote from: þerxh Sant-Enogat on January 27, 2024, 07:40:01 AMIn order to allow the Legislative Advisory Committee (el Comità da Redacziun Legislatïu, or CRL) to resume its operation

A quick note for the sake of posterity, so that there's no risk of someone in the future taking this as meaning that the CRL cannot operate without the A-X, or any other member, being absent.

The CRL has always been active and properly constituted throughout the now-Deputy A-X's compassionate leave, and at no time has its operation been somehow imperiled, including during the current Mençei's very drawn-out election and the service of the Senator for Fiovă as Acting Mençei, and during the vacancy in the office of Tuischac'h between Dissolution and my own re-election, where the CRL was actually operating as a two-member committee de jure, and not just de facto.

Further reading can be found here: https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=2829.0

Regardless, in the upcoming Clark I will be offering legislation to clarify this, and allow the A-X to delegate away their seat on the CRL, as part of my efforts to revamp Title H.
#75
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 24, 2024, 05:54:18 PM
Quote from: Sir Lüc on January 24, 2024, 05:46:49 PM(Can I ask you to edit the original comment to reflect the latest version, @Miestră Schivă, UrN  ?)

If by that you mean "the first post in the thread", then that's done; but I'm not sure this is a good thing to do in future because it falsifies the historical record

You're not wrong, but otherwise there'd be no way to reliably know what the current working draft is. It's an unfortunate byproduct of our very informal way of doing things.

(There's certainly a discussion to be had on what the draft-to-Clark pipeline should look like in the CRL era so we can strike a balance between clarity, complexity and preservation of all stages of debate.)