May I step on as a cosponsor?

This text seems a straightforward deletion.  Looks good.

Estimat Secretary,

For the Mencei's appointment, I appoint Eiric S. Bornatfiglheu.

RZ20- AUS
RZ21- PER
RZ22- PER
RZ23- PER

Given that this isn't binding law, the specific verbiage matters little.  But it does make displeasure abundantly clear.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on October 06, 2022, 12:41:36 AMNow if we wanted to do something actually funny, we would recognize the Czech annexation of Kaliningrad

Hmm... If I get a spare moment this week (about to go into Tech), my office might just write an official letter of congratulations to Pres. Zeman on the new acquisition.

Esteemed Senators,

Please vote here or elsewhere as established by law and custom.

This seems like a thorough rewrite, and I'm not catching any typos in the bill itself (aside from the ones there by design).  Looks good to me.

RZ15 - CONTRA
RZ16 - AUSTENEU
RZ17 - AUSTENEU
RZ18 - PER
RZ19 - PER

In looking at this, I think this is going to operate like you want it to.  So greenlight.

I concur.  Good to go.

Indeed it is.

Estimats Senators,

In accordance with tradition, statute, and the rules of business, please post your votes and debate for this Clark here or elsewhere (you know the places).

Every nation has its major speeches.  Those addresses that help to define or redirect a culture.  The US might have the Eulogy for the Crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger from Reagan, The Four Freedoms by Roosevelt, and I Have a Dream by Martin Luther King.  Or perhaps the Cornerstone Speech by Alexander Stephens or the Mission Accomplished Speech of Bush.

What are these speeches for Talossa?  Given the great majority of our interchange is written on fora, that would extend to writing, I imagine.

In terms of the mechanics of this Bill, I don't see anything wrong with it.  It seems pretty straightforward.

I do wonder if it might fall afoul of Right of Assembly, but that's for the CPI to hash out should it ever come to that.