Dear fellow Cézembreans, you have a few days to consider running for the most prestigious position of the nicest Province in the Kingdom !

If you have plans for our Province and its lovely people, then declare yourself before Sunday 13th!

You can surely do better than our current Sénéchal, whose activity level for the province is possibly as low as his rankings in the recent TCAT competition


Liberté, Dignité, Hilarité!

According to our constitution Chapter III, and as general elections deadline was 1st of September 2026 the timeline of our élections for the Sénéchal de Cézembre is set as below :


Article 13. A Sénéchal shall be elected, by the citizens of Cezembre, in an election conducted by the Sénéchal or his appointed agent, in the event there is no incumbent Sénéchal or the Sénéchal is inactive for more than a week, the Governor-General or his appointed agent. All citizens of Cézembre have the right to vote and/or be a candidate in this election.
Article 14. Elections as described by article 13 will take, no less and no longer than 3 weeks. Cézembrians must announce their candidacy in the first week of the election (i.e from Monday September 7th 00:00 CéST until Sunday September 13th 23:59 CéST) and polls shall open on the first day of the 2nd week (i.e. from Monday September 14th 00:00 CéST) and close on the last day of the third week (i.e. until Sunday September 27th 23:59 CéST).
Article 15. Elections, as described in articles 13 and 14 will start no earlier than one week and no later than two weeks after the election deadline of Talossan general elections (ie September 1st) or after a resolution has been approved by a majority of the l'Etats de Cézembre removing the previous Sénéchal or should the Sénéchal, resign, die or be unable to fulfill his duties for any reason.

That was basically the other outcome I had seen as well. Either we do it the long way or the short way, we're back to square one.

Actually, it may not be a bad idea to amend the constitution to switch to automatic filling of vacancies, but that's a question for the Assembly to consider once it's seated.

👍

Whereas, presently the King, Seneschal, and Secretary of State can request an advisory opinion from the Cort pü Inalt, and

Whereas, presently the Government's chief legal advisor, the Avocat-Xheneral, nor the principal originators of legislation can request an advisory opinion from the Cort pü Inalt, and

Whereas, by removing this advisory opinion we can adopt a preferable "case or controversy" approach to legislative consultation rather than using them as "ad-hoc lawmaking."

Therefore, be it enacted by the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa, that paragraph five (5) of OrgLaw Article VIII.6, which currently reads:

QuoteNotwithstanding any contrary proscription, the King, the Secretary of State, or the Seneschal may refer an issue to the Cort pü Inalt for an advisory opinion provided that any such panel reviewing the position is composed of no less than three Judges after any necessary recusal, there lacks a live case or controversy that would otherwise determine the issue, and there is a reasonably need for resolution of the question.

is hereby deleted.

Uréu q'estadra så
Breneir Tzaracomprada (MC-BREN)