I'll be taking care of  this one.

Yes, and that's essentially what we're going to be doing.  But I have been advised that it's better practice to have a dedicated @Talossa.com email account for the purpose, and that's the technical issue right now.  We want to be able to keep track of who accesses all of this personal information, I think, for the purposes of compliance with some sort of regulation.

Couldn't I just create an email account, then set up forwarding to the Leader of the Opposition's email account? Then when the leader changes I just change the forwarding address. Just a thought.

-Txec R

The Minister of Technology is working on a solution to create an account, which our system isn't set up to handle, and when that happens, of course your Majesty will be central since you will be the legal custodian of the account.

Here, what I'm talking about will just be a short-term solution to comply with the law in good faith.

Shouldn't the opposition stand-alone account involve me since under the law I will be the one who controls it?

-Txec R

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Yesterday at 05:48:39 PMWith news of the April recess, Talossa's premier news channel announces that it has made some programming changes. For the April edition of its flagship political program, Abbavilla Digest, we are pleased to announce a special edition interview with new Talossan, @Moinul Moin.

The discussion will cover the recent remarkable political changes in Bangladesh from the perspective of a Bangladeshi-Talossan. Sincere gratitude to S:reu Moin for speaking to the Digest!

Thanks again! @Breneir Tzaracomprada and "Abbavilla Digest"

With news of the April recess, Talossa's premier news channel announces that it has made some programming changes. For the April edition of its flagship political program, Abbavilla Digest, we are pleased to announce a special edition interview with new Talossan, @Moinul Moin.

The discussion will cover the recent remarkable political changes in Bangladesh from the perspective of a Bangladeshi-Talossan. Sincere gratitude to S:reu Moin for speaking to the Digest!

Paging @Danihel Txechescu , who might be able to assist.

No response has been received

Reporting out a little early, since I'm not sure how busy I will be this weekend, I can say that we've had an unusual number of incomplete applications all in one short time.  They were missing anything about themselves and/or address information.  I investigated to see if there was something weird going on, but I think it's just a coincidence.  Still healthy levels of interest.

For period: 1 March 2026 to 31 March 2026
----
Incomplete: 6
No Wittenberg: 10
In progress: 5
Successful: 0
Total applications: 21

Zooming out a little over the last three months in total, we can see some useful numbers:



We're at 200% of our naturalization goal, which is great, and we're doing it without ushering in people who appear disinterested in Talossa.  There's been half a dozen people in the pipeline who have technically qualified to immigrate, yet their obvious apathy has resulted in no petitions for them.  So our healthy rate is not just quantity, but quality.  Good job, Talossan citizens!

It's interesting to note that there's a pretty sharp winnowing effect at work -- half of all applicants fail because they aren't interested enough to get on Wittenberg, and half again fail to stay interested once they're here.

There appear to still be technical difficulties with making an Opposition stand-alone account, so I will be consulting with members of the opposition to discover what their preference might be for the time being.

For period: 1 January 2026 to 31 March 2026
----
Incomplete: 12
No Wittenberg: 31
No post: 6
In progress: 11
No petition: 0
Successful: 6
Total applications: 66

'Incomplete' refers to those applications which were not filled out correctly or completely, and which were returned with an explanation. 'No Wittenberg' refers to those applications which were complete, but in which the applicant did not go on to make an account on Wittenberg. 'No post' refers to those applications from the period in which the prospective never made a post and so the process has been terminated.  'In progress' refers to those applications from the period which were complete and in which the applicant is still being considered. 'No petition' refers to those applications which were complete and considered, but for which no petition was received. 'Successful' refers to naturalizations completed.