News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
So, wait. Am I to understand that the Ministry of Justice had a charging document all drawn up already against a Talossan citizen, and now that's not going ahead?

Or was the charging document a "John Doe" type of thing, name to be filled in later?

In any case, let this serve as notice that, to the next Cosa, I will present an amendment to El Lexhatx G.6.1, which will make it clear that when the Ministry of Justice lodges a charging document, it will be open to public view. If the Government have enough evidence to take someone to court, it only serves natural justice that they have the confidence to name a name, even if some of the evidence has to stay secret until trial.
#2
Group 4

6 - Soundgarden
4 - Bon Jovi
3 - Led Zeppelin
2 - The Smiths
1 - B-52s

Group 5

6 - Johnny Cash Ring of Fire
4 - New Order
3 - Johnny Cash Hurt
2 - House of Pain
1 - Talking Heads

-Txec R
#3
Wittenberg / Re: Election question
Last post by Sir Lüc - Today at 12:43:04 PM
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 09:29:35 AM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Today at 09:26:21 AMDidn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

You don't have that in the US either, what you see during Election Night are the numbers coming in as they count all the ballots after the polls are closed.

Yeah, especially when election nights were more of an event in the years before COVID, we theorised releasing results province by province to simulate precinct results coming in. The consensus was that there's so few voters in certain provinces, especially swing voters, that you would be able to pretty much figure out what everyone voted.
#4
Wittenberg / Re: Election question
Last post by Tric’hard Lenxheir - Today at 11:23:23 AM
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 09:29:35 AM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Today at 09:26:21 AMDidn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

You don't have that in the US either, what you see during Election Night are the numbers coming in as they count all the ballots after the polls are closed.

Okay true, I guess the difference is in how long the election runs in Talossa LOL
#5
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Today at 09:26:21 AMDidn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

You don't have that in the US either, what you see during Election Night are the numbers coming in as they count all the ballots after the polls are closed.
#6
Wittenberg / Re: Election question
Last post by Tric’hard Lenxheir - Today at 09:26:21 AM
Quote from: Istefan Perþonest on Yesterday at 07:04:17 PM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Yesterday at 11:12:46 AMI was just wondering if there is any way to follow election results. I found a link to see who has not voted yet but I was wondering if we can see current results, not who voted for who just total votes cast for and against issues and candidated.

The core trouble is that would blow up ballot secrecy. If the system reports a live record of who voted, and a live total of current results, then someone can copy both down, and when the next vote comes, in, they know both who voted and how they voted (because they can see which totals changed).

Didn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States
#7
Vuode / Re: Senate election
Last post by Tric’hard Lenxheir - Today at 09:24:40 AM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 05:04:12 PM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Yesterday at 04:44:38 PMI am not a member of any party

So you're not going to be a reliable vote for your old party, the Progressive Alliance, who are backing you in this election?

I never was, it was one reason I left, I did not like being told how to vote.
#8
Thank you for being transparent concerning your findings. I confess to being confused as to where the current track is headed. I can't tell whether this was AI bot interference, human error, or a combination of both.
#9
The evidence already gathered allowed us to immediately match up the pattern observed with the Tzaracomprada ballot with a developing glitch that the Chancery has identified.  Details such as the manner of submission, time taken, and other features make it hard to reach a conclusion.  All of those things add up to a sort of digital fingerprint, and we already had one print on file, so to speak, and they don't quite match.  The Chancery has advised not to reach a conclusion here.

We're puzzling through it, but hopefully these are all the same problem.
#10
Wittenberg / Re: [ELECTIONS] Ballot tamperi...
Last post by Sir Lüc - Today at 07:27:10 AM
Quote from: Istefan Perþonest on Today at 07:19:32 AMI wonder . . . it sort of sounds like a browser prefetch or AI feature gone wrong.

Do we know if the humans were all using the same web browser software (say, Chrome 151)?

Four were using Chrome 150/151 on Windows, Mac OS or Android; one was using Safari 26.6 on iOS.