TANDI QE Crement Itravilatx tent compiaçat toct i resquiraziuns lexhitais per l'aðmiçiun àl Regipäts Talossan, es tent comvimçat la naziun es noi da sieu intereçù in la citaxhienità Talossan (la Mhiglhor Cosă Qe L'Erxhent Non Put Comprar), da sieu intenziun es desireu à partiçipar in noastră vidă naziunal, es da sieu leialtà àl Coronă, noi sint rat es þonourat àð aðmiçar perventüră Crement Itravilatx àl statüs exaltat del 602-l:t CITAXHIÉN VEITAT DEL REGIPÄTS TALOSSAN, es dal provinçù Florenciă, cün toct i drepts, privilexhuns, es deveirs qi sint iherinds à ça.

Fäts par va mha in la nómină del Regeu Txec es sub sieu Saxhel Rexhital li 16. Fevraglh in l'anneu dal eră comun 2026, in el secund anneu del röin da noastra soveran cortös Regeu Txec, es el 47-l:t dal independençù da Talossa.

---

WHEREAS Crement Itravilatx has completed all the legal requirements for admission to the Kingdom of Talossa, and has satisfied the nation and us of his interest in Talossan citizenship (the Best Thing Money Can't Buy), of his intention and desire to participate in our national life, and of his loyalty to the Crown, we are pleased and honoured hereby to admit Crement Itravilatx to the exalted status of the 602nd NATURALISED CITIZEN OF THE KINGDOM OF TALOSSA, and of the province of Florenciă, with all the rights, privileges, and duties thereunto appertaining.

Done by my hand in the name of King Txec and under his Royal Seal this 16th day of February in the year of the common era 2026, in the second year of the reign of our gracious sovereign King Txec, and of the independence of Talossa the 47th.




Sir Lüc da Schir
Secretar d'Estat / Secretary of State

Quote from: xpb on Yesterday at 06:25:08 PMRead thecon.ai and get back to us.  My interpretation is that either p(Boom) or p(Doom) both only serve to enhance the status of these current text extrusion mechanisms .

I have been following Geoffrey Hinton (and some of the other globally relevant academics at the University computer science department where I work) for guidance but think that the specific probabilities we assign to the Boom or Doom potential is influenced by the extent to which we effectively and collectively govern its development.

The resolution is less an emphasis on either the Boom or Doom probabilities and more an encouragement toward collective management (global governance) of AI development.

Personally I would prefer a worldwide ban on AI

Read thecon.ai and get back to us.  My interpretation is that either p(Boom) or p(Doom) both only serve to enhance the status of these current text extrusion mechanisms .

Whereas, artificial intelligence has rapidly become a transformative force affecting healthcare, industry, climate monitoring, governance, and many other aspects of human life, and

Whereas, the international community has recognized that AI capabilities are expanding faster than internationally agreed governance frameworks, leaving many states and companies outside significant global governance initiatives, and

Whereas, the United Nations General Assembly has recently launched new multilateral initiatives, including the Global Dialogue on AI Governance and the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, intended to foster inclusive international cooperation, evidence-based oversight, and shared standards, and

Whereas, experts widely acknowledge that trustworthy AI ecosystems, responsible innovation, and collaborative international governance are essential for ensuring that artificial intelligence develops safely, sustainably, and inclusively, and

Whereas, fragmented national approaches to AI regulation risk undermining public trust, innovation, and the equitable distribution of AI's benefits worldwide.

Therefore, be it resolved, that it is the Sense of the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa that the Ziu affirms that artificial intelligence is a global and humanity-wide public concern requiring cooperative international governance, transparency, and ethical safeguards, and

The Ziu supports the development of inclusive international mechanisms — whether through the United Nations or other multilateral frameworks — to coordinate responsible AI development, risk monitoring, and policy dialogue, and

The Ziu encourages governments, private sector actors, civil society organizations, and scientific communities to collaborate in establishing evidence-based standards that maximize AI's benefits while minimizing social, environmental, and security risks, and

The Ziu expresses its belief that responsible global governance of artificial intelligence is essential to ensuring that technological progress serves humanity as a whole rather than itself or other narrow or destabilizing interests.

Uréu q'estadra så:
Breneir Tzaracomprada (MC-Green)

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on February 12, 2026, 06:18:33 PMLooks ok to me

Thanks Tric'hard.
@Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP ?
@Béneditsch Ardpresteir ?

Today, we posted the classic but important proposition to become a Talossan citizen, on X/Twitter, Facebook, Threads, Bluesky, TikTok and r/Micronations

Oath sent

Quote from: mximo on February 14, 2026, 11:12:28 PMAzul,

This is the kind of loophole we want to correct.

We always assumed that the vote finish when everybody have vote or when the fourteen days are over.

Mximo

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on February 14, 2026, 02:26:56 PMGood morning to my now-fellow Pastours -- I apologize for the delay, I wanted to make sure my appointment was official in line with provincial constitutional procedure.

In line with my previous pledge to do so, I abstain on Resolution 5. I believe this means the measure will pass with eight votes in favor, none opposed, and one abstention. However, do I correctly see no provision for the early closure of votes when their outcome is assured? If that is the case, per the bill's sponsor under Article IV, Section 3, voting is still open for ten more days, though I am happy to be corrected in the event I've missed something hiding in the Constitution somewhere. I apologize if this creates a bit of a needless delay, but given the highly unusual nature of Florencia's current executive arrangement, I'd prefer we really do things by the letter of the law to avoid any issues.

(If I am correct, that may be a good example of a reform for the Committee to keep in mind...)

Folks, there is a method to end debate early. It was established by a constitutional amendment I wrote several years ago with Resolution 2020-08.

Azul,

This is the kind of loophole we want to correct.

We always assumed that the vote finish when everybody have vote or when the fourteen days are over.

Mximo