News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Claimed a seat via the database.

Most likely my second and only time.
#2
L'Óspileu/The Chat Room / Re: [Royal] Mourning
Last post by Mximo Malt - Today at 05:13:13 PM
Quote from: King Txec on December 09, 2025, 08:55:04 PMThe Queen and I mourn the passing of our royal cat Oreo. He was our baby from 2010-2025.



-Txec R

Poor kitty... :(
#3
Cézembre / Re: Citizens of Cézembre : cla...
Last post by xpb - Today at 04:26:44 PM
Quote from: xpb on May 26, 2024, 10:23:13 AMI, X. Pol Briga, citizen of the Sovereign Province of Cézembre, hereby claim a seat in l'Etats.

I do this again, but I think the new polling was setup to accommodate this
#4
Wittenberg / Re: [ELECTIONS] November-Dece...
Last post by xpb - Today at 04:19:41 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Today at 01:43:10 PM@Sir Lüc
10 American buckaroos have been sent to @xpb by Zelle for payment of the Green Party fee. If you might publicly confirm receipt, Mister Burgermister? Zelle confirmation number is 6BE17ZQ7.
I show the payment as pending but in progress
#5
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 01:23:00 PMa lot of our voters, who specifically mentioned some of the URL mailers that motivated them to vote Prog.

I'd be interested to hear from those people. I can understand that the "tone" of the URL mailers might have struck some as overwrought, but the content - that the PA preferred to make an alliance with absolute monarchists, and thus in a very real and practical sense didn't value democracy - had the virtue of being true. That came back to bite you.

It also confirms what I've been saying for ages about how the PA is not held together by political principle, but by an "ingroup/outgroup" distinction. Anyone can join the ingroup if they agree not to criticise anyone else in the ingroup. And this characterisation is something you seem to be really upset by. Equally so as alleged "lies" and "aggression". I'm not sure why, but I hope you accept that this is a good faith political characterisation which makes no imputation of bad character.

In any case, I'm not sure what led you to make that "Leader's Post" in public - an attempt to "negotiate by press release"? a response to internal pressures? - but you have to remember that there are two sides here to the negotiation and it didn't help build good faith on our side.
#6
Here is a material idea I had about how to potentially increase cooperation and trust, no matter how things turn out: perhaps the leader of the opposition should be "read in" on major decisions in private. Any interest in that idea?
#7
Wittenberg / Re: [ELECTIONS] November-Dece...
Last post by Breneir Tzaracomprada - Today at 01:43:10 PM
@Sir Lüc
10 American buckaroos have been sent to @xpb by Zelle for payment of the Green Party fee. If you might publicly confirm receipt, Mister Burgermister? Zelle confirmation number is 6BE17ZQ7.
#8
Okay, well, I don't think we're going to agree.  I'm going to leave it there.  I hope that however things turn out, we can find a productive way to work together on things in the future.
#9
Green Party / Re: On pretzel-making
Last post by Breneir Tzaracomprada - Today at 01:39:09 PM
Chances seem to be inching higher...Greens stand ready. :)
#10
Step 1: Propose a solution that removes power from singular Government official and divides it among multiple people

Step 2: His Lordship complains because it's not his bill, even though his bill does nothing to remove power from singular Government official

Step 3: Senators representing a majority of provinces recognize weakness of His Lordship's bill, vote against.

Step 4: His Lordship proceeds to spin narrative that we wanted to keep secretive power, despite proposing a bill that does the opposite.

You're right, no real reason to have an extended argument, better to just set the narrative straight now.