| Pos | ± | Team | Pts Ove | Pts Today | |
| 1st | (=) | Gordon Hiatus Support Team (GHS) | 6943 | +612 | |
| 2nd | (=) | Cyclohexane (CHX) | 5710 | +510 | |
| 3rd | (+2) | Cézembre Caçeirs dals Mailintzarăs (BDC) | 5691 | +670 | |
| 4th | (-1) | Els Talossaes Rexhital (REX) | 5668 | +495 | |
| 5th | (-1) | Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis (MMM) | 5476 | +338 | |
| 6th | (+1) | Team In The Wind (ITW) | 5385 | +543 | |
| 7th | (-1) | Velociposse Florencia (VFL) | 5312 | +363 | |
| 8th | (=) | Cézembre Fieschā (CFA) | 3501 | +372 |
Quote from: Glüc on Today at 10:47:10 AMWhat happened?!!Quote from: Glüc on May 26, 2026, 03:39:41 PMLike the GC, the KOM winner is also pretty much decided at this point. Ciccone did get some KOM points, but he has no chance of ending ahead of Vingegaard.
Well this was completely wrong. Oops. Fascinating stage today.
Quote from: Glüc on May 26, 2026, 03:39:41 PMLike the GC, the KOM winner is also pretty much decided at this point. Ciccone did get some KOM points, but he has no chance of ending ahead of Vingegaard.
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on February 28, 2026, 02:47:29 PMQuote from: þerxh Sant-Enogat on January 17, 2026, 10:35:51 AMQuote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on January 16, 2026, 03:03:37 PMIf this bill is rewritten to (a) make responsibility for administering Talossawiki unambiguous; (b) explicitly give admins/moderators of TalossaWiki authority to revert troll edits and ban repeat offenders, on the same line as the Consequences Act; (c) delete the noxious attempt to bring down the force of the Law on Wiki editors, it might prove useful.Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 16, 2026, 03:07:45 PMþerxh, would you be willing to wait on sending it to the CRL? Sorry, I know you were ready to go with it, and I should have said something earlier, but there's been a lot going on.
Of course, happy to give us all a bit more time to define a good legal framework for the administration and the moderation of our Wiki, which I think deserves a special status
@Sir Lüc , sorry for the disturbance, could you please move this bill back to the Hopper ?
Is this bill moving forward in the near future? Looks to be stalled since it was moved back to the Hopper in mid-January...
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 09:09:24 AMI just hope to hold onto the podium by my fingernails at this point.Milan getting the opportunity to sprint today was pretty bad news for you in that regard. A podium is still very much possible though. (I think so anyway. I haven't actually checked the virtual standings.) Piganzoli is realistically your only hope to make a difference with CHX/BDC/ITW, so a lot will depend on him getting points in the final mountain stages and hanging on in GC for you.
| Pos | ± | Team | Pts Ove | Pts Today | |
| 1st | (=) | Gordon Hiatus Support Team (GHS) | 6331 | +316 | |
| 2nd | (+2) | Cyclohexane (CHX) | 5200 | +292 | |
| 3rd | (-1) | Els Talossaes Rexhital (REX) | 5173 | +111 | |
| 4th | (-1) | Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis (MMM) | 5138 | +108 | |
| 5th | (=) | Cézembre Caçeirs dals Mailintzarăs (BDC) | 5021 | +120 | |
| 6th | (=) | Velociposse Florencia (VFL) | 4949 | +111 | |
| 7th | (=) | Team In The Wind (ITW) | 4842 | +110 | |
| 8th | (=) | Cézembre Fieschā (CFA) | 3129 | +71 |
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 09:53:46 AMThe people's will is best and most directly expressed by their vote, and we should be careful about wise elders deciding when the people's will shouldn't count.
QuoteElections to the Cosă shall be conducted following the principles of personalised proportional voting.
- Voters shall be given the choice to either vote for a single party list at-large, or to distribute exactly 20 individual votes among all candidates listed on all party lists. A single candidate may be awarded up to three individual votes.
- Seats shall be apportioned among party lists according to their at-large party list votes as well as the total individual votes for their candidates using the largest remainder method. Individual candidate votes shall count as one twentieth of an at-large party list vote for the purposes of party seat apportionment. In case of a tie, the party with the higher total vote count is prefered.
- Party seats shall be apportioned among their list candidates according to their individual votes using the largest remainder method. In case of a tie, the candidate listed higher on the list is prefered.