| Pos | ± | Team | Pts Ove | Pts Today | |
| 1st | (=) | Gordon Hiatus Support Team (GHS) | 6015 | +253 | |
| 2nd | (=) | Els Talossaes Rexhital (REX) | 5062 | +162 | |
| 3rd | (=) | Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis (MMM) | 5030 | +193 | |
| 4th | (+2) | Cyclohexane (CHX) | 4908 | +271 | |
| 5th | (-1) | Cézembre Caçeirs dals Mailintzarăs (BDC) | 4901 | +163 | |
| 6th | (-1) | Velociposse Florencia (VFL) | 4838 | +172 | |
| 7th | (=) | Team In The Wind (ITW) | 4732 | +165 | |
| 8th | (=) | Cézembre Fieschā (CFA) | 3058 | +213 |
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 05:43:09 PMSeat limits are currently determined by turnout, so an election with fewer active citizens will already result in a higher seat limit, which sounds like exactly what we would want here.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 05:34:35 PMBut I think we might need to figure out some other solution here, because I feel like my concerns are valid too!
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 05:17:44 PMMaybe I am misunderstanding something?
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 05:03:15 PMMaybe in that case, we can also get rid of seat limits.
Quote from: Françal I. Lux on Yesterday at 04:26:48 PMAs long as the voters can choose who they want as their representatives regardless of party affiliation, I would be ok with an open list voting system as a compromise.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 04:52:32 PMThe rule (in statute) would be: the party list. The party puts its senior members at the top, in the case of a closed list; in the case of an "open list", the list ranking is determined by votes for individual candidates. Everyone on the list that is eligible going down gets one seat; when you run out, you go back to the top. The idea that one MC can have *multiple* times as many votes as another is something I dislike.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 04:52:32 PMWith respect, that's not an answer to my question. If this amendment were to pass, would you agree that the party list system as I have describe it would be organic and binding?
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on May 26, 2026, 05:20:14 PMORGANIC LAW REFORM AMENDMENT THREE: EXPULSIONS
I think we need to fix the language here so that we're not implying that this was a trial, which might trigger other protections. But I support the basic idea here.
It's a copy-paste of the equivalent provision for the Senäts.