@Françal I. Lux Now it's eligible to be Clarked.

We need Minister of Defence @Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be to weigh in on this

Bring back Iarneria

good to go

I see no reason to not let this proceed

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on October 23, 2026, 03:32:04 PM@Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir Now, as a resident rather than Nimlet member I am concerned that we may not see a gubernatorial appointment without your intervention.

I am starting to wonder whether Florencia qualifies for direct royal administration. The constitutional reform failure and difficulties with appointing executive leadership certainly make it seem so. Either that or the province should be merged. Right now it is just an extra senats seat representing an inactive group.

This has been a topic of conversation for years, and aside from the existence of the Royal Talossan Navy and the Zouaves, the topic of an "Army" has always died, and for good reason imho.

I live in a slight fear macronational authorities would come across this or some other Talossan forum, see the existence of an "army" and make it out to be the seeds of some insurgent movement.  The Navy and the Zouaves, not so much.

For now, I would vote against such a thing as the Talossan "army".  The "military" we have is more than we need, and the United States of America is a nice buffer-state between us and the existential menace that is Canada.

- GV

For approval, tagging the CRL:
@Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir @Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC @Moinul Moin

Quote from: Sir Lüc on <strong>Today</strong> at 06:04:52 AMThis needs to go to complete CRL passage *today* if it is to appear on the Second Clark.

Please move this to the CRL for review.

The difference between the ZAR and a regular army would be the sorts of situations each would be intended to respond to. Talossa, as it currently exists, doesn't have situations where that sort of distinction is necessary, and the ZAR already does all the ceremonial, cultural and administrative stuff you mentioned.