Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 09:29:35 AM

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Yesterday at 09:26:21 AMDidn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

You don't have that in the US either, what you see during Election Night are the numbers coming in as they count all the ballots after the polls are closed.

Okay true, I guess the difference is in how long the election runs in Talossa LOL

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on Yesterday at 09:26:21 AMDidn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

You don't have that in the US either, what you see during Election Night are the numbers coming in as they count all the ballots after the polls are closed.

Quote from: Istefan Perþonest on August 16, 2026, 07:04:17 PM

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on August 16, 2026, 11:12:46 AMI was just wondering if there is any way to follow election results. I found a link to see who has not voted yet but I was wondering if we can see current results, not who voted for who just total votes cast for and against issues and candidated.

The core trouble is that would blow up ballot secrecy. If the system reports a live record of who voted, and a live total of current results, then someone can copy both down, and when the next vote comes, in, they know both who voted and how they voted (because they can see which totals changed).

Didn't really want to know who voted just a running total like you see on tv in the United States

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on August 16, 2026, 05:04:12 PM

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on August 16, 2026, 04:44:38 PMI am not a member of any party

So you're not going to be a reliable vote for your old party, the Progressive Alliance, who are backing you in this election?

I never was, it was one reason I left, I did not like being told how to vote.

Thank you for being transparent concerning your findings. I confess to being confused as to where the current track is headed. I can't tell whether this was AI bot interference, human error, or a combination of both.

The evidence already gathered allowed us to immediately match up the pattern observed with the Tzaracomprada ballot with a developing glitch that the Chancery has identified.  Details such as the manner of submission, time taken, and other features make it hard to reach a conclusion.  All of those things add up to a sort of digital fingerprint, and we already had one print on file, so to speak, and they don't quite match.  The Chancery has advised not to reach a conclusion here.

We're puzzling through it, but hopefully these are all the same problem.

Quote from: Istefan Perþonest on Yesterday at 07:19:32 AMI wonder . . . it sort of sounds like a browser prefetch or AI feature gone wrong.

Do we know if the humans were all using the same web browser software (say, Chrome 151)?

Four were using Chrome 150/151 on Windows, Mac OS or Android; one was using Safari 26.6 on iOS.

I wonder . . . it sort of sounds like a browser prefetch or AI feature gone wrong.

Do we know if the humans were all using the same web browser software (say, Chrome 151)?

Hm... concerning.

Azul, I'm afraid the Chancery is currently investigating 5 ballots that were improperly submitted on the Database.

One of the five voters wrote me this morning detailing, with clear pictures, how his receipt showed a straight PRESENT ballot despite the confirmation modal on the voting page showing a fully compiled ballot.

I investigated the case through the logging and certification functions of the Database and found that the pattern in all five cases is the following:

• The legitimate (human) voter accesses the ballot;
• Some external (likely non human) actor, with an IP belonging to a Google block and a different UserAgent from the legitimate voter, immediately accesses and submits the ballot;
• The legitimate voter attempts to submit the ballot, but as a ballot in their name was already cast, they get redirected to the receipt for the external actor's vote instead.

In all five instances, the ballots were recorded as straight PRESENT choices. (EDIT: Additionally, it always takes exactly 6 seconds for the ballot to be submitted once accessed by the external actor.)

In three out of five instances, the external actor UserAgent, interestingly, was the same across all instances, and never appeared on any other ballots, EXCEPT for S:r Tzaracomprada's improperly submitted ballot (which also was recorded as straight PRESENT, and which EDIT: took 7 seconds to be submitted), and one single legitimate voter, which I already verified looks normal.

In the other two instances, the UserAgent was only different by a digit and shared by 6 other legitimate voters.

I am honestly at a loss; my theory is some sort of AI agent or bot by Google messing with the regular casting of votes. Either way, this isn't a Database problem, which paradoxically makes it more difficult for me to fix it.

The Chancery will immediately contact all affected voters to explain the situation and offer to recast or correct their ballots.

The Chancery will also explore ways to mitigate the issue going forward, e.g. blocking the Google IP range from which the external actors submitted the ballots, or adding a Captcha of some sort to the Database ballot, which might be challenging with an election actively underway.