Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 11:47:05 PMOkay, so if everyone's agreed that what we're looking for is a series of OrgLaw and Lexhatx amendments that:
a) will mandate that all Members of the Cosa will be candidates who stood at the election (given some relaxation of seat limits);
b) will allow either a closed-list or open-list system to be established by normal statutory law (by the 63rd Cosa onwards);
then I think we can press forward with this. But I just want to make sure we're all on the same page with this.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 08:34:43 PMNot directly related to what's going on here right now, but since it seems like we'll be going ahead with cyclical party lists, I've added cyclical tie-breaks to my SPAV tabulator. I have yet to hear anything about it... feel free to tell me if I should stop referencing it here.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 08:55:16 PMQuote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Yesterday at 08:51:27 PMQuote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 08:34:43 PMNot directly related to what's going on here right now, but since it seems like we'll be going ahead with cyclical party lists, I've added cyclical tie-breaks to my SPAV tabulator. I have yet to hear anything about it... feel free to tell me if I should stop referencing it here.
I checked it out but wasn't sure how to use it, Marcel.
Upload a ballot file -- you can download an example file based on the December 2025 election (I just noticed it was broken, I fixed it now), enter the turnout (last election's turnout was 105), select a tie-break method, and you should be getting the results.
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Yesterday at 08:51:27 PMQuote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 08:34:43 PMNot directly related to what's going on here right now, but since it seems like we'll be going ahead with cyclical party lists, I've added cyclical tie-breaks to my SPAV tabulator. I have yet to hear anything about it... feel free to tell me if I should stop referencing it here.
I checked it out but wasn't sure how to use it, Marcel.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 08:34:43 PMNot directly related to what's going on here right now, but since it seems like we'll be going ahead with cyclical party lists, I've added cyclical tie-breaks to my SPAV tabulator. I have yet to hear anything about it... feel free to tell me if I should stop referencing it here.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 08:40:22 PMWhat kind of feedback were you looking for? Should a bunch of us try it out?