News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#21
Azul.


Am I already join progressive Alliance ?
#22
El Ziu/The Ziu / Re: [Terpelaziun] Finance Mini...
Last post by Françal I. Lux - Today at 09:15:45 AM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Today at 08:45:11 AMTuischach, this enquiry is for the Finance Minister.

@Françal I. Lux Is the government planning to submit a budget for approval during the second Clark (El Lexhatx D.2.8.3)?
Yes, I will be working on it this weekend.
#23
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Yesterday at 11:02:00 PMWhat did you think of the first episode, Francal?

I thought it was good. It's definitely write by a new generation of writers which I'm ok with. I didn't realize it was set in the 32nd century which will take some getting used to.

I haven't gotten the names down yet but the Klingon medic-in-training is an instant favorite! A lot of history has happened by this point in the timeline and I'm curious to see how the galaxy will be this far into the future. I can definitely see this as their attempt to attract a younger audience and I can easily see the show slowly becoming more complex and epic as it unfolds.

Also love Paul and Holly's characters!

What about you?
#24
Certainly.  Thank you for sending the chain.
#25
Tuischach, this enquiry is for the Finance Minister.

@Françal I. Lux Is the government planning to submit a budget for approval during the second Clark (El Lexhatx D.2.8.3)?
#26
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on January 05, 2026, 10:23:20 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on January 03, 2026, 05:16:59 PM@Baron Alexandreu Davinescu
Just mailed the chain of office which should arrive, just in time, on either the 9th or 10th of January.

@Baron Alexandreu Davinescu you mentioned reimbursement for mailing the chain of office. It was 29 CAD. Please let me know of your preferred transferral method.

@Baron Alexandreu Davinescu Seneschal a quick reminder and a change in the request. Would you please send the reimbursement to the Burgermeister @xpb  as a donation to the BHAID?
#27
@Sir Lüc , please move this to the CRL.
#28
Quote from: Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir on Today at 03:47:03 AMIn order to allow what you're suggesting would actually be a great shift away from current laws and presidents in Talossa. And will dilute to separation of powers.

Just to be clear: this aspect of the law would not be changed.  The current law already allows provinces to make their own decisions about that, and they can give any powers they wish to their cunstaval.  My bill isn't actually changing this.

So while I understand your criticism, it's a separate issue -- you're asking me to make an additional, complicated change that would restrict the provinces in a new way.

If I were to create this new restriction, I'm not sure how to word it.  It would be complicated to phrase it in such a way that it would be meaningful -- "you're not allowed to assign your cunstaval any powers" would essentially defeat our whole purpose here, so we'd need to... I don't know, make a list of powers that we're permitting them to assign?

I'm open to suggested amendments, if you have any language to add, but you're just demanding something outside of the scope of the bill.
#29
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 02, 2026, 11:30:29 AM
Quote from: Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir on January 02, 2026, 11:18:33 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on January 02, 2026, 07:44:19 AMOh, I see. Well, that wouldn't be closing a loophole, that would be a significant change. In the past, some provinces have chosen to have their Constable also serve as the ceremonial head of state or the head of their government. So I don't want to prevent provinces from doing that. Provinces will already be now enabled to pass their own restrictions on who can hold the office, and they can add this restriction if they so choose.

That isn't exactly trye as the current convention in appointments of Cunstavals are supposed to be from a separate province.
As having a cunstaval also be the head of government in a province seems like a dangerous position with one person having too much power.

So doing so would be closing a loophole and formalising the principals behind currently conventions
Actually, there was a specific reform enacted to change the rule that Cunstavais need to be from a different province, since some people resented it.

I think provinces are probably the best judges of how to distribute power in their own province, right?  Most of them have chosen a weak executive.  They can decide to have any role or restriction that they want.


The major issue hear is Separation of powers as allowing a Cunstaval to become a head of a government, would be akin to allowing the King to become the senechal. And politisiing the crown in the province.

Allowing provinces to create laws about the limits of the Cunstaval outside of those granted under organic law, is honestly a good thing.

AndI support the idea of this bill.But, not in so far that it allows the politicisation of a possition that in its core, is the REPRESENTATIVE of the Crown and king in a province.

In order to allow what you're suggesting would actually be a great shift away from current laws and presidents in Talossa. And will dilute to separation of powers.

Which is why it should be clear in law that the Cunstaval of a province cannot become the head of government of ANY province, especially one they are Cunstaval over.

Honestly, it might be worth all saying that one cannot become Senechal too. (I think ministers, MC/sentarors and seats in provincial assemblies are debatebale but fine especially with the low active members we have, but I do think that holding executive power and the power of the crowns representative is a dangerous and undemocratic position)