Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 08, 2025, 05:30:17 AMPlease be aware that Max has agreed to a coalition agreement in which he is only going to work on promoting our language, and anything else requires approval from me.  Talossa will not be turning into a theocratic autocracy on my watch, don't worry.

"Please be aware that Comrade Stalin has agreed to a coalition agreement in which he is only going to work on ethnic minority issues, and anything else requires approval from me."

I suppose that someone who's only even lived in a liberal democracy doesn't understand how people who come from a country where they're a real threat would react to the politics of reactionary Traditionalism.

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 08, 2025, 05:30:17 AMWe went through a whole campaign of this, and the voters just rejected it in a very clear voice.  It's not a good idea to try to scare people by lying about your political opponents, since it creates a lot of animosity and scares people.  And also we just saw how it doesn't work. 

Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on December 08, 2025, 12:12:44 PM@Mximo Malt Once again speaking only as an individual MC I would support this bill assuming the former King acknowledged and assumed responsibility for the facts of what happened.

With that assumption, the return of Ben to the nation he founded could be an enormous positive. Generally, I support your efforts at reconciliation.

I have reached out to him, and have received no reply as of yet. I'll let him clarify his actions once he comes back, if at all.

+++ MISM +++


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

@Mximo Malt Once again speaking only as an individual MC I would support this bill assuming the former King acknowledged and assumed responsibility for the facts of what happened.

With that assumption, the return of the nation's founder could be an enormous positive. Generally, I support your efforts at reconciliation.

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 08, 2025, 09:15:49 AMAt week four, the Mençeis were dishonouring the name of their province every single game:

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on November 03, 2025, 07:26:15 AM1. Manager-less Team 1 3-0-0 902.80
2. Vuode Villains 2-1-0 1,139.20
3. Banqeu da Cézembre Zambonis 2-1-0 915.60
4. Cjovani Squilats 2-1-0 913.10
5. Els Talossaes Rexhitais 2-1-0 847.00
6. Tigreux dal Belacostă 1-2-0 993.50
7. Gordon Hiatus Support Team 1-2-0 859.90
8. Cézembrean Amateurs on Ice 1-2-0 795.90
9. Maricopa Havana Hijinks 1-2-0 745.40
10. Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis 0-3-0 681.60

But now we've risen to #6, in a storybook development that can only be rivaled by epics like Air Bud.

Songs will be written and monuments will be built.

You are currently in the final playoff position

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 08, 2025, 09:24:01 AMTo clarify, I mean the total number of seats each individual was permitted to hold.  For example, this Cosa it's 20 seats maximum per person.  Would it be 2 seats maximum per person under this new law?

EDIT: Okay, so it sounds like it would be 2 per person for an election like this one.

Yeah, as much as I would like a proper Real Cosă (and this could be easily achieved by deleting Lexh.H.4.1), I understand that we currently don't have the manpower to have 20 individual MCs — hence why this is called the Pseudo-Real Cosă Act.

That's why I was asking! I won't.

As a cross-party sponsor who would be put in a tough spot by this, please don't.

To clarify, I mean the total number of seats each individual was permitted to hold.  For example, this Cosa it's 20 seats maximum per person.  Would it be 2 seats maximum per person under this new law?

EDIT: Okay, so it sounds like it would be 2 per person for an election like this one.

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 08, 2025, 09:18:30 AMWill there be any effect on things like the party seat rules or the number of seats a person can hold?

The formula used to determine the maximum amount of seats an MC can hold (party seats * 10 / number of votes, rounded up) remains unchanged.

I was thinking about sponsoring this as a Government bill, but I don't want to put any cross-party sponsors in a tough spot.  Would there be any objection to this?