I voted on the database.  I abstained from the only bill under consideration, since on the one hand I think BHAID is generally unobjectionable, but on the other hand I an loathe to vote in favor of a bill that essentially just exists to congratulate an MC (especially this one).

The Census is now open for responses and citizens are being notified via email as I type this.

Please use this thread to report any issues with the website.

Voting on the September 2025 Clark (the fifth of the 61st Cosă) is now open, until the 21st of the month, at 19h30 TST.

You can find the Clark at: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/terms/61/clarks/4 (database) or at https://wiki.talossa.com/images/5/5a/August2025Clark.pdf (pdf)

MCs and Senators can all vote on the new Database using the credentials I sent you earlier: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/clark/vote

If you wish to vote on Wittenberg, MCs can vote here and Senators can vote here. Please do not vote any other way or on any other thread.




Sir Lüc da Schir, UrB
Secretary of State

Senators, you can cast your votes on the Fifth Clark here or on the database: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/clark/vote

You can find the Clark at: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/terms/61/clarks/5 (database) or at https://wiki.talossa.com/images/b/ba/September2025Clark.pdf (pdf)

If you vote here on Witt, do not indicate any conditions which may make it sound like this vote isn't final: you can always change your vote later.

Members of the Cosă, you can cast your votes on the Fifth Clark here or on the database: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/clark/vote

You can find the Clark at: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/terms/61/clarks/5 (database) or at https://wiki.talossa.com/images/b/ba/September2025Clark.pdf (pdf)

If you vote here on Witt, do not indicate any conditions which may make it sound like this vote isn't final: you can always change your vote later.

Restricting legislators from topical discussion is a fairly extreme thing to do.  You have not provided any examples to justify this restriction.  Accordingly, I will be voting against your proposal.

On the other matter, we did just write a bill to criminalize disruption, so maybe let's just see how that goes. I'm not sure you'll ever be able to eliminate general rudeness.

Quote from: Sir Lüc on August 31, 2025, 03:58:58 PMMoved, and sorry about the quoting change, it was unintended and I reverted it.

Thank you for changing it back so quickly, wow!

Moved, and sorry about the quoting change, it was unintended and I reverted it.

The mechanisms of harassment are not different, and the Túischac'h already has jurisdiction over Hopper threads (if they're not bullied into retirement). But a wider point is: if MZs had to ask the Túischac'h for permission to ask supplementaries, they might think twice about bullying them into retirement.

That said, the point that if supplementaries are restricted but Terps are not, you'll just get a forest of Terps is well taken.