News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#31
Wittenberg / Re: [GOVT] Cartography
Last post by Baron Alexandreu Davinescu - Yesterday at 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 11:05:39 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 09:54:03 AMTafi, I wanted to save you some trouble, so I tried my hand at the diacritics.  I think these are the ones that needed to change: Fiovă, Florenciă, Fluvia Montevudio, Cüfeir, Las Inaltans Maxhestici, Vilatx Freiric, and Dun Cestour?  We don't use that circled I at all or some of the accented Es, right?  I edited my bill to fix the old spellings in other places, too.
Heres the full list of changes:

Flúvia Montevúdio --> Fluviă Montevudio
Cüféir --> Cüfeir
Las Înaltàns Maxhéstici --> Las Inaltans Maxhestici
Florencia --> Florenciă
Sandadia --> Sandadiă
Taglheiria --> Taglheiriă
Zuerieiria --> Zuerieiriă
Ovestia --> Ovestiă
Vilátx Fréiric --> Vilatx Freiric
Dún Cestour --> Dun Cestour
Fiôvâ --> Fiovă

Everything else stays the same.

Okay, I give myself a C+ for my list.  That darn Romanian a!

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 11:05:39 AM
QuoteAlso, I did some investigation of that border.  There's an onramp that it seems to be following, which is weird.  I think that legally I am more correct, since the tracts were the basis for the law but not the actual law.  If I were to have the map follow the onramp, we'd need to change the law to reflect what are in effect new borders and a change in territory, I think.

Considering that the canton borders were originally defined in terms of census tracts, it would be in the spirit of the law to follow the onramp. If that requires a change to the letter of the law, so be it.
I'm okay with it the way it is, I think.  If we do transfer that territory, then we can handle that then.
#32
Wittenberg / Re: [GOVT] Cartography
Last post by Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP - Yesterday at 11:05:39 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 09:54:03 AMTafi, I wanted to save you some trouble, so I tried my hand at the diacritics.  I think these are the ones that needed to change: Fiovă, Florenciă, Fluvia Montevudio, Cüfeir, Las Inaltans Maxhestici, Vilatx Freiric, and Dun Cestour?  We don't use that circled I at all or some of the accented Es, right?  I edited my bill to fix the old spellings in other places, too.
Heres the full list of changes:

Flúvia Montevúdio --> Fluviă Montevudio
Cüféir --> Cüfeir
Las Înaltàns Maxhéstici --> Las Inaltans Maxhestici
Florencia --> Florenciă
Sandadia --> Sandadiă
Taglheiria --> Taglheiriă
Zuerieiria --> Zuerieiriă
Ovestia --> Ovestiă
Vilátx Fréiric --> Vilatx Freiric
Dún Cestour --> Dun Cestour
Fiôvâ --> Fiovă

Everything else stays the same.

QuoteAlso, I did some investigation of that border.  There's an onramp that it seems to be following, which is weird.  I think that legally I am more correct, since the tracts were the basis for the law but not the actual law.  If I were to have the map follow the onramp, we'd need to change the law to reflect what are in effect new borders and a change in territory, I think.

Considering that the canton borders were originally defined in terms of census tracts, it would be in the spirit of the law to follow the onramp. If that requires a change to the letter of the law, so be it.
#33
Quote from: Liz Quiehui on Yesterday at 09:30:34 AMDear President and Council Members,

Thank you very much for your dedicated time in reviewing my application and for providing this institutional feedback. I highly respect the academic rigor and standards maintained by the Royal Society for the Advancement of Knowledge.

I sincerely appreciate your encouragement to develop my work further. I will carefully take your guidance into account to refine the research methodology and integrate proper primary sources and citations. Wishing you all a wonderful and happy weekend ahead.

Respectfully yours,

Liz Quiehui


Liz, as you work on a new application, please let me know if you need any help. I would be happy to help.
#34
Green Party / Re: Green Party Activity Watch
Last post by Breneir Tzaracomprada - Yesterday at 10:26:01 AM
This is fantastic hun! I would suggest submitting questions to government ministers (terpelaziuns) to supplement this. Let me know if you need help.
#35
Quote from: Crement Itravilatx on Yesterday at 01:13:38 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 10, 2026, 01:58:38 PMI will maintain this stance indefinitely, until such time as you take steps to rehabilitate yourself by resigning from the Cosa and undertake this educational course in how to understand and prevent sexual harassment of all kinds.

Brandon please allow me to co-sponsor your bill?


Yes, of course, hun. I'll add you now.
#36
Wittenberg / Re: [GOVT] Cartography
Last post by Baron Alexandreu Davinescu - Yesterday at 09:54:03 AM
Tafi, I wanted to save you some trouble, so I tried my hand at the diacritics.  I think these are the ones that needed to change: Fiovă, Florenciă, Fluvia Montevudio, Cüfeir, Las Inaltans Maxhestici, Vilatx Freiric, and Dun Cestour?  We don't use that circled I at all or some of the accented Es, right?  I edited my bill to fix the old spellings in other places, too.

Also, I did some investigation of that border.  There's an onramp that it seems to be following, which is weird.  I think that legally I am more correct, since the tracts were the basis for the law but not the actual law.  If I were to have the map follow the onramp, we'd need to change the law to reflect what are in effect new borders and a change in territory, I think.
#37
Dear President and Council Members,

Thank you very much for your dedicated time in reviewing my application and for providing this institutional feedback. I highly respect the academic rigor and standards maintained by the Royal Society for the Advancement of Knowledge.

I sincerely appreciate your encouragement to develop my work further. I will carefully take your guidance into account to refine the research methodology and integrate proper primary sources and citations. Wishing you all a wonderful and happy weekend ahead.

Respectfully yours,

Liz Quiehui
#38
Wittenberg / Re: [GOVT] Appointments to the...
Last post by Baron Alexandreu Davinescu - Yesterday at 08:35:19 AM
The wiki is updated.

EDIT: Also trying to fix the styling up a little bit, but I may have forgotten how to mess with the wiki CSS since I set it up twelve years ago

FURTHER EDIT: Fancier!  I also see a lot of other things I want to improve about the wiki, though.
#39
Wittenberg / Re: A question to Talossa:
Last post by Baron Alexandreu Davinescu - Yesterday at 08:34:25 AM
What is the ultimate goal of Talossa?  That's a great question, and you're going to get a number of different answers (just like you would if you asked what the ultimate goal of the United Kingdom might be).

For myself, I think my ultimate goal is to help create something wonderful that lasts.  Talossa is independent from the whims of any one person, and if you make changes or work in service here, then there's a good chance you can build a legacy that will continue for a long time.  If you're a politician, you can have a big impact on policy decisions and guiding the country -- we're small, so your voice will always be influential.  And finally, I'm here to have fun... it's just fun getting to try new things!
#40
Wittenberg / A question to Talossa:
Last post by Riley Kenny Clow - Yesterday at 08:23:52 AM
- I'm unsure as to whether I, as a prospective citizen, am able to randomly put up these new topics, but I thought, whatever!

Me and my partner have only been prospective citizens for a day and we have a growing interest in Talossa - not only it's history, politics and mechanics, but its people and their desires. We both identify as devoted Liberal Democrats back home in the UK, and the ideology is one we think can enhance any system. With the thought of potential political participation merely in mind, and i'm certainly not trying to lure anyone into broosking - me and Wyatt would both like to address the citizens of Talossa, and simply ask them what they want, purely as to get to know more about the nations fundamental beliefs and that only: What is the ultimate goal of Talossa, in short? I questioned King Txec himself on this just yesterday, out of pure interest, (and he thought I was some pesky journalist - fair...), but do its citizens want more..? I understand some see Robert I's unanswered declaration sent way back as proof of Talossas macronationality, but is there anyone who wants more independence perhaps? - this is purely asked out of interest. I want to know more about the fundamental desire of Talossan's.

I should make clear, I really am not attempting to get anyone in trouble in the sense of broosking - I really just want to learn more about the nations very basic belief systems - I understand if no major political party member feels comfortable replying to quite a political question, however.