That makes sense to me. Added bonus, that allows us to put energy into helping that candidate's campaign, instead of being forced to take a hands-off approach.

The question, then, is what sort of method would we want to see otherwise?

Wow you even have a license for otherwise useless old truckers!

A representative democracy requires a base of citizens who are keen to take on that responsibility. Contrast this to a populist/presidentialist system, where you just need "one guy" with fire in his belly and a bunch of mostly passive voters.

This is why the URL supports both (a) a smaller Ziu which can be filled competitively by those who are keen, rather than stuffed full of the barely active; (b) an immigration process which promotes civic responsibility rather than raw numbers.

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on March 04, 2026, 10:29:08 PMGiven that there has been some internal discussion over the past few months regarding possible amendments to the Party Constituziun, I hereby open the floor to any such proposals.

For example, I believe @Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC has stated a desire to reform the endorsement process for Senäts candidates found in Article III, Section H?

Yes, hello. The current text reads as follows:

QuoteH. Party-affiliated candidates in Senäts elections shall be endorsed by the Party on the condition that they agree to endorse all other party-affiliated candidates in that same election. Any candidates who agree to this condition and fulfill it shall receive endorsement from the Party en masse, with the recommendation that they be ranked above any other candidates in an internal order of the voter's choosing.

This was written in the assumption that, in a Ranked Choice Voting system, URL candidates and supporters would be able to grasp the concept of a preference exchange - i.e. you vote [1] for your own guy and [2] for the other guy from your party, so no votes were spoiled.

This led to a complete catastrophe in the last Maricopa Senäts election, where voters for @Pol dal Nordselva and @Txotéu Davinescu completely failed to do this. So it may be that we need to return to one endorsement per vacancy, if our own members don't get how Ranked Choice voting works.

Something we have planned to do is put together an archive of important and useful files like that, for just these sort of amazing initiatives. Obviously, there's been a lot going on right now in terms of government projects, but I might try to bump that one up a little bit and get it set. Have to talk to MinTech some more about best practices.

Quote from: King Txec on Yesterday at 12:50:35 PMThis is starting to look awesome. One thing I would add is since you are using the Arms of the State, my signature should also appear under it in the same way it appears under the Arms on the ID cards.

-Txec R

...a PNG of the signature would be certainly useful.

It's great for sure.

This is starting to look awesome. One thing I would add is since you are using the Arms of the State, my signature should also appear under it in the same way it appears under the Arms on the ID cards.

-Txec R

Quote from: King Txec on Yesterday at 11:35:42 AMI think something like a permsec would be better for continuity.

-Txec R

I wonder if I could issue myself a Talossan driving licence after I pass my learner's permit.

Here's the reverse.


Obtained classes are highlighted in red with the date of issue/obtainment in white.