I have experience with several different ones although I'm pretty rusty as I don't use them regularly, but I like to dabble!

• LISP
• Prolog
• Python
• Perl
• C/C++
• Java
• Javascript
• etc.

Quote from: xpb on Yesterday at 10:19:53 AMwhether the delightfully unique structure of the Kingdom should be adjusted

This is sheer conservatism with no justification. The status quo is Talossan, therefore it must be preserved.  But conversely - whatever we change it to will also be Talossan.

Both XPB and the Baron have said plainly that they think that *any* change is tantamount to a revolutionary change and thus must be resisted.  But the world didn't end when we abolished the hereditary monarchy - nor when we changed monarchs, despite XPB's strenuous efforts to argue that that would be a catastrophe.

There will continue to be "a voice" for provincial representation; just no longer a final veto.

PER

xpb

I vote PER

PER

-Txec R

Quote from: Françal I. Lux on Yesterday at 08:52:34 AMI'd like to call for a vote on S:reu Malt's application for membership nonetheless.

The vote is already underway. You and Miestră are voting in favour, no one else has submitted a vote so far.

Iac Marscheir @Iac Marscheir: --
Marcel Tafial: --
Cresti Nouacastra-Läxhirescu @C.d.I. Nouacastra-Läxhirescu, MSC: --
Miestră Schivă: PER
Françal Ian Lux: PER
Xhorxh Pol Brigă: PER
Lüc da Schir: PER
Txec dal Nordselvă: PER
Breneir Tzaracomprada: PER
Üc Tärfâ @Üc R. Tärfă: --
Cresti Siervicül @C. M. Siervicül: --

I think what this comes down to is whether the delightfully unique structure of the Kingdom should be adjusted.  This appears to be an attempt to make the system more boring, and more like other systems of government.  There should continue to be a voice for the population of specific provinces expressed in a different way than that of the entire population, and that the current status quo of that voice should be preserved at the current strength.

I'd like to call for a vote on S:reu Malt's application for membership nonetheless.

Done.

@Sir Lüc kindly move this to the CRL