News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#31
Wittenberg / Re: Talossan Army
Last post by Barclamïu da Miéletz - Yesterday at 05:22:49 PM
Quote from: Moinul Moin on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 12:53:32 AMProposal: Establishing Talossan Army

I would like to propose the establishment of a Talossan Army as a new institution within the Kingdom of Talossa.
I'm against Talossa having an army. I just don't see the purpose of us having one if we're unrecognised on the international arena.

If we were recognised, as a pacifist, I would still be against us having an army and would personally instead push to handle everything diplomatically and avoid conflicts as much as possible.

However I see the Zouaves as an integral part of Talossa and would like for those to remain as they are and retain their function with no military involvement at all.
#32
@Françal I. Lux Now it's eligible to be Clarked.
#33
Wittenberg / Re: Talossan Army
Last post by Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC - Yesterday at 02:09:24 PM
We need Minister of Defence @Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be to weigh in on this
#34
Florenciă / Re: Florencia Journal
Last post by Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC - Yesterday at 02:08:06 PM
Bring back Iarneria
#35
good to go
#36
I see no reason to not let this proceed
#37
Florenciă / Re: Florencia Journal
Last post by Breneir Tzaracomprada - Yesterday at 01:10:00 PM
Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on October 23, 2026, 03:32:04 PM@Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir Now, as a resident rather than Nimlet member I am concerned that we may not see a gubernatorial appointment without your intervention.

I am starting to wonder whether Florencia qualifies for direct royal administration. The constitutional reform failure and difficulties with appointing executive leadership certainly make it seem so. Either that or the province should be merged. Right now it is just an extra senats seat representing an inactive group.
#38
Wittenberg / Re: Talossan Army
Last post by GV - Yesterday at 11:24:18 AM
This has been a topic of conversation for years, and aside from the existence of the Royal Talossan Navy and the Zouaves, the topic of an "Army" has always died, and for good reason imho.

I live in a slight fear macronational authorities would come across this or some other Talossan forum, see the existence of an "army" and make it out to be the seeds of some insurgent movement.  The Navy and the Zouaves, not so much.

For now, I would vote against such a thing as the Talossan "army".  The "military" we have is more than we need, and the United States of America is a nice buffer-state between us and the existential menace that is Canada.

- GV
#40
El Funal/The Hopper / Re: Budget for the 63nd Cosa [...
Last post by Françal I. Lux - Yesterday at 10:55:44 AM
Quote from: Sir Lüc on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 06:04:52 AMThis needs to go to complete CRL passage *today* if it is to appear on the Second Clark.

Please move this to the CRL for review.