[ABANDONED] The Separate Ways Act

Started by Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be, January 14, 2025, 01:23:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on July 20, 2025, 10:16:28 AMI wonder about the requirement that an MC may only move from one party to another once, though.  Does that infringe on the right to free political association?  What do you think?

Given the choice between the two things this bill has always attempted to balance -- namely, "the right to political association" vs. "the right of the voters to know what they're voting for ahead of time" -- I would argue that mild restrictions on the former such as those created by this bill are the more acceptable.
"mike you don't get to flex your custom emotes on me if you didn't vote in tmt20😡" - Lüc da Schir

Baron Alexandreu Davinescu

I think it's great for voters to know what they're voting for, but only one of those two things you're balancing is in the Covenants.
Alexandreu Davinescu, Baron Davinescu del Vilatx Freiric del Vilatx Freiric es Guaír del Sabor Talossan

                   

Baron Alexandreu Davinescu

Trying to think of what might make this work.... Maybe it would be simpler just to make a rule saying that a person lost their seats when they left their party?
Alexandreu Davinescu, Baron Davinescu del Vilatx Freiric del Vilatx Freiric es Guaír del Sabor Talossan

                   

Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on July 21, 2025, 12:44:56 AMTrying to think of what might make this work.... Maybe it would be simpler just to make a rule saying that a person lost their seats when they left their party?

Something to the effect of "resignation of one's party affiliation shall be held to include resignation of one's seats"?
"mike you don't get to flex your custom emotes on me if you didn't vote in tmt20😡" - Lüc da Schir

Baron Alexandreu Davinescu

Yes, maybe?  Not sure how I feel about that or if I'd vote for it, but an OrgLaw amendment to that effect might be the simplest route to your goal.
Alexandreu Davinescu, Baron Davinescu del Vilatx Freiric del Vilatx Freiric es Guaír del Sabor Talossan

                   

Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be

I would be interested in hearing what others think about that path. Rather a large change from what I had in mind, but does protect the voters' results while also enforcing party discipline a bit more strongly than I had envisioned.
"mike you don't get to flex your custom emotes on me if you didn't vote in tmt20😡" - Lüc da Schir

Breneir Tzaracomprada

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on July 22, 2025, 01:10:27 PMI would be interested in hearing what others think about that path. Rather a large change from what I had in mind, but does protect the voters' results while also enforcing party discipline a bit more strongly than I had envisioned.

I don't support that path. We've long held that once assigned the seats are with the MC. I think hewing to your original vision as much as possible while finding a way to accommodate the Covenant concerns is the best path forward. I especially support the ability to register parties between elections.
Leader, Green Party
---------------
Joy is that leaky bucket that lets me sometimes carry half a song. But what I intend for us, our claim, that joy is the justice we must give ourselves. -J. Drew Lanham