[CLARKED] The Pacific Realm Act

[þerxh Sant-Enogat]

No objection to this bill.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

I is a title of el Lexhatx.  El Lexhatx is divided up into titles, which are then divided into sections, and then into subsections, and then into subsubsections, and so on.  Please fix the spots where you have used erroneous and confusing labels.  (Section I could be read as Section 1 of the title you were just referencing, for example.)

Looking at the text of the bill, I see this same problem.

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

Looking at the text of the bill, I see this same problem.

Thanks, has it been addressed now?

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

Thanks, has it been addressed now?

I am hoping silence means it has been.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

In many contexts, silence does not mean consent.

No, the problem still exists.  Maybe I'm not being clear, so let me just suggest this:

Therefore be it enacted by the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa that el Lexhatx D.2.4, which currently reads:

blahblah

shall be deleted in its entirety.

Furthermore, the whole of el Lexhatx I, which currently reads:

blahblah

shall be deleted in its entirety.

Furthermore, a new section C.1.8 shall be added, to read as follows:

blahblah

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

In many contexts, silence does not mean consent.

No, the problem still exists.  Maybe I'm not being clear, so let me just suggest this:

Therefore be it enacted by the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa that el Lexhatx D.2.4, which currently reads:

blahblah

shall be deleted in its entirety.

Furthermore, the whole of el Lexhatx I, which currently reads:

blahblah

shall be deleted in its entirety.

Furthermore, a new section C.1.8 shall be added, to read as follows:

blahblah

No you were not being clear. I will separate the deletions.

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

Alright, the deletions have been separated as suggested.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

There was also a problem with how you referring to the sections, which is why I wrote out a more specific way (specific problem is a failure to refer to the whole of I).  But okay.

I vote not to approve this bill.

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

There was also a problem with how you referring to the sections, which is why I wrote out a more specific way (specific problem is a failure to refer to the whole of I).  But okay.

I vote not to approve this bill.

Thank you Baron. I don't think there is any lack of clarity on the intent of the bill. Even the King explicitly stated understanding the entirety of I was being deleted when responding with his concerns.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

I think it is unlikely there will be much problem, especially given this extensive discussion, but I would do the same with any other bill that seemed ambiguous or poorly-drafted.  That's the whole point of the CRL.

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

I think it is unlikely there will be much problem, especially given this extensive discussion, but I would do the same with any other bill that seemed ambiguous or poorly-drafted.  That's the whole point of the CRL.

It is not ambiguous but I appreciate the help with improving the bill.

[King Txec]

This bill still deletes an entire Title of El Lex, and it removes a huge portion of the cultural life of Talossa. I still intend to veto this bill.

-Txec R

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

This bill still deletes an entire Title of El Lex, and it removes a huge portion of the cultural life of Talossa. I still intend to veto this bill.

I initially took this out of the CRL to address your concerns, Your Majesty. I made changes and then asked for your review after making changes. You never responded unfortunately. Now, a month later, I am wondering what of Talossa's cultural life does the bill remove so that I can address that concern?

[King Txec]

I likely missed the changes, sometimes Witt posts get buried. I am completely opposed to eliminating the entire military service.

-Txec R

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

I likely missed the changes, sometimes Witt posts get buried. I am completely opposed to eliminating the entire military service.

-Txec R

I wanted to clarify this bill repurposes the Zouaves as Talossa's combined "cultural and defence forces" so it does not eliminate our military. And allows those in external armed forces the same ability to serve there in uniform. I made those changes based on your opposition. Does this not address your concern?