So the SoS wouldn't get to overrule the Ziu, but they would be in charge of every provincial board (rather than local governments), the board for the College of Arms (rather than the King/Queen of Arms), the College (not the president there), and so on? Can you point to anything in the law that actually says this power exists in this way?
I can point that out, I think.
First, lets's look at what the law of this nation of laws actually says. The law actually says that NewWitt should only be hosting provincial sub-forums for the "provinces that so request" (Lex.J.1). I won't bother going into the nitty-gritty on this, seeing as exactly zero provinces have ever officially made such a request, therefore Wittenberg should not actually be currently hosting any provincial sub-forum at all (but if you really want this nation of laws to follow the law down to the last comma then you know how to file a suit (not sure who you would sue though, since the guy that created all the NewWitt provincial sub-forums isn't a citizen any more, but
(expletive removed) rock on, law dude).
Anyway, the very fact that El Lex has that phrase ("provinces that so request") indicates that it is not mandatory for provinces to even have a sub-board on NewWitt. So, to what you assert ("they would be in charge of every provincial board (rather than local governments")... Yes. If a province is supposed to legally request the Chancery host a forum board for them, then yes, the province should yield any say in how that sub-forum operates. If the province doesn't like that, then the province is free to
not make a request for a forum to be hosted on Witt and can go set up it's own methods of communication. Further, if something as important as a province gets this level of treatment then you can be sure that something like the College of Arms can be treated in law in the same way. Don't agree? Court.
I have repeatedly and emphatically said that this has nothing to do with this particular incident, but rather the very surprising fact that the SoS was asserting this power. It's better to sort these things out at first light, rather than establish a precedent that the SoS may censor at will.
Your entire argument against the Chancery, here, is the exact opposite of what you have argued in the past while in defence of King John as a private individual having the exact same powers over OldWitt on Proboards. You once argued that it was 100% legit and cool for John to moderate Witt and enforce Wittiquette as he saw fit without oversight from anybody. Now that we are in a position where the SoS has Witt control, while the SoS is subject to impeachment and removal from office and is subject to scrutiny and oversight, you're crying blue bloody murder?
THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHY YOU ARE CONSTANTLY ACCUSED OF ARGUING IN BAD FAITH.
You know what.
(expletive removed) the government's code of conduct.
Apologies to my (possibly ex) cabinet colleagues.
I'm willing to take the chop for this.
AD, You don't even realise that the only reason we have pandered to your
(expletive removed) nonsense for this long is only because we feel the need to keep highlighting your
(expletive removed) to new citizens, visitors and those yet to learn all about you for what you actually are; that you're nothing more than just a narcissistic and vainglorious
(expletive removed) determined to "win at Talossa" by arguing that black is white just because the other side said the other. How many arguments have you started in the past week? The past month? You're
(expletive removed) relentless. You start some
(expletive removed) somewhere and as soon as you are called out on it you scream that you're the victim, when in reality you are nothing but a troll that got the result you set out to get: attention.
Unequivocally, Just
(expletive removed) off, you absolute weapon.
I am so sick and tired of coming online to do some Talossa stuff only to be distracted by your
(expletive removed) (expletive removed). Are you not tired of it? Would you not rather just
(expletive removed) off to your own little corner and work on your own little bit of something to contribute to what we are all trying to achieve here? Over and over and over, when you could be just working on your history book or whatever project you intended on getting into when you 'politically retired' or just away pulling on your todger, you keep coming back, every five
(expletive removed) minutes to pick ... No,
(expletive removed) it. I'm done. I'm not doing this again and again. I really hope you enjoy being king of the ashes., because that's where it's headed.
(expletive removed) bellend.
And all this only touches on your most recent behaviour. I've not even went near (oh, but I'm
(expletive removed) about to) your bullshit with V that skirted round the edges of homophobia (not to mention how you frequently 'innocently and unintentionally' drop transphobic and mentally-challenged buzzwords buried within walls of seemingly innocuous text). But, all that doesn't really explain my own personal problem with you. I mean, yeah, I ignored all that stuff. I'll live with that guilt. But for the benefit of anyone wondering when I, personally, switched against you? Well, it started at some point around 2016. It wasn't a boolean on/off thing; that's just roughly when I started to see patterns. Patterns in how you would manipulate your own party members. Hey, I don't even know if you did it to all party members, but you did it with me. How you would feed me
(expletive removed) sandwiches. But, that's cool, that's just management, right? How about when you would try playing my emotions by using my past against me? When you would play the role of my greatest recovery cheerleader then play the role of a disappointed father figure to manipulate my feelings to guide my actions? When you would try filling my head with self-doubt about my own abilities? You are nothing but a total piece of
(expletive removed).
LOL, and then that time you (and Cresti, btw) convinced us all to follow the party lead in defending that other piece of
(expletive removed), BenArd, during his impeachment for being a raging hard-on of a bigot while in office. Wow! You actually got me to vote against my conscience on that one (52RZ6).
How many ex-Rumpers have opened their eyes to you now? Myself, Nordselva, Tim, Viteu... ?
The RUMP party has completely collapsed.
You are now running around without any
(expletive removed) allies.
And you still won't change the record.


What the
(expletive removed) is actually wrong with you?
Is this just how it looks when a control freak loses control?
Explain it.
Know what.
Doesn't even matter.
You won't even see what I am saying here as legit.
You won't even recognise any of this as valid.
You'll somehow still manage to play the sweet wordsmith and colour me the bully.
I don't even care.
Just,
(expletive removed) you, Alex.
Just,
(expletive removed) you and
(expletive removed) off.
I'll happily take my Witt suspension now, S:r SoS (if Alex allows it). It was
(expletive removed) worth it.
Edit...
Expletives removed. I've calmed down and it's not fair on visitors to be forced to read that kind of language. Content and substance stands unedited.