Ceadfă del Ziu: Restoration of National Honour

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

The funny thing is I didn't say KR1 was a tyrant. Just made the point that even in Mximo's tradition, not all Kings are worthy of allegiance.

The technical term for how he operated would be "abusive bully and authoritarian". Imagine a country where the forms of multiparty democracy are intact, but the Head of State keeps up a constant stream of threatening invective and slander against opposition politicians, uses politicised investigations against them to drive them out of participation, and maintains a biased electoral system which gives his voting base proportionally unfair power.

Actually, if you're a US citizen, that shouldn't be hard to imagine LMAO.

[Françal I. Lux]

If we had a state religion (theoretically), I would think that the Archbishop of Abbavilla would have the right to suspend or depose the King/Queen based upon his actions, but that would seem too theocratic...

As a Buddhist myself, Christian theocracy is a big fat NO for me.

[Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be]

If we had a state religion (theoretically), I would think that the Archbishop of Abbavilla would have the right to suspend or depose the King/Queen based upon his actions, but that would seem too theocratic...

As a Buddhist myself, Christian theocracy is a big fat NO for me.

Unfortunately, your "Got What I Voted For" award is already in the mail.

[Françal I. Lux]

Unfortunately, your "Got What I Voted For" award is already in the mail.

How clever!

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

@Mximo Malt Once again speaking only as an individual MC I would support this bill assuming the former King acknowledged and assumed responsibility for the facts of what happened.

With that assumption, the return of the nation's founder could be an enormous positive. Generally, I support your efforts at reconciliation.

[Mximo Malt]

@Mximo Malt Once again speaking only as an individual MC I would support this bill assuming the former King acknowledged and assumed responsibility for the facts of what happened.

With that assumption, the return of Ben to the nation he founded could be an enormous positive. Generally, I support your efforts at reconciliation.

I have reached out to him, and have received no reply as of yet. I'll let him clarify his actions once he comes back, if at all.

+++ MISM +++


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mximo Malt]

Will this be added to the 1st Clark next month, [mention]Sir Lüc [/mention] ?

[Sir Lüc]

Will this be added to the 1st Clark next month, [mention]Sir Lüc [/mention] ?

The normal process is that a Call for Bills, in which members can put their bills forward to get a vote, is opened by me sometime around the 25th. I'm still waiting for the Túischac'h election to be resolved and for the CRL to then be back to a complete slate before doing that though.

One thing I can tell you already is that you should relabel this proposal, though, because by definition it cannot be called an "act" if it doesn't seek to create, amend or repeal legislation. This kind of nonbinding resolution is more accurately defined as a Sense of the Ziu (in your case, "Sense of the Ziu: Restoration of National Honour" or something similar)

[Mximo Malt]

Will this be added to the 1st Clark next month, [mention]Sir Lüc [/mention] ?

The normal process is that a Call for Bills, in which members can put their bills forward to get a vote, is opened by me sometime around the 25th. I'm still waiting for the Túischac'h election to be resolved and for the CRL to then be back to a complete slate before doing that though.

One thing I can tell you already is that you should relabel this proposal, though, because by definition it cannot be called an "act" if it doesn't seek to create, amend or repeal legislation. This kind of nonbinding resolution is more accurately defined as a Sense of the Ziu (in your case, "Sense of the Ziu: Restoration of National Honour" or something similar)

So how do I change the title to reflect that?

[Sir Lüc]

Will this be added to the 1st Clark next month, [mention]Sir Lüc [/mention] ?

The normal process is that a Call for Bills, in which members can put their bills forward to get a vote, is opened by me sometime around the 25th. I'm still waiting for the Túischac'h election to be resolved and for the CRL to then be back to a complete slate before doing that though.

One thing I can tell you already is that you should relabel this proposal, though, because by definition it cannot be called an "act" if it doesn't seek to create, amend or repeal legislation. This kind of nonbinding resolution is more accurately defined as a Sense of the Ziu (in your case, "Sense of the Ziu: Restoration of National Honour" or something similar)

So how do I change the title to reflect that?

You can edit the original post, and changing the title on that will change the title of the whole thread.

I noticed one additional thing in the meantime - your signature on the proposal is usually written in Talossan, using the word "Ureu q'estadra så" (or "Noi urent..." if you get any cosponsors), with every sponsor listed underneath in the format Name Surname (MC-Party abbr.) or Name Surname (Senator-Provincial abbr.) as appropriate.

In your case, therefore:

Ureu q'estadra så,



Mximo Malt (MC-IDT)

(But I generally take care of formatting sponsors myself when making the Clark, if there are any issues)