[CRL] The TalossaWiki is not a battleground Act

Started by þerxh Sant-Enogat, December 21, 2025, 11:49:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mximo Malt

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 03:13:41 PMI guess you could sue yourself maybe.  If you also get yourself appointed as a judge, you could sue yourself, hear your own case, move to have yourself removed from the case, overrule your own motion, issue an injunction against yourself, and then implode into a ball of self-referential micronationalism.
Am I to understand that my question was stupid?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maximus Maltus

Fundarius et Capus Partiti IDT

"Ego autem et domus mea serviemus DOMINO!" - Josue XXIV:XV

Baron Alexandreu Davinescu

Quote from: Mximo Malt on Today at 03:59:02 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 03:13:41 PMI guess you could sue yourself maybe.  If you also get yourself appointed as a judge, you could sue yourself, hear your own case, move to have yourself removed from the case, overrule your own motion, issue an injunction against yourself, and then implode into a ball of self-referential micronationalism.
Am I to understand that my question was stupid?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, I'm just being silly.
Alexandreu Davinescu, Baron Davinescu del Vilatx Freiric, Seneschal del Regipäts Talossan

ESTO·BENIGNUS·ESTO· FORTIS·VERUM·QUAERE

                   

Sir Lüc

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Today at 02:28:07 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 21, 2025, 01:34:28 PMI'm not familiar with any provision transferring administration of the wiki to the Chancery.  I'm fairly sure that it's a Propaganda or Technology issue, unless I missed a significant legal change.

The Government has never, to my knowledge, administered TalossaWiki. The Government is in charge of "official pages", but TalossaWiki has always been administered by the Chancery not by the Government. There has been no legal change because the Government has never done this, and it has been the Chancery that keeps it ticking on in the background.

Actually, I'm quite surprised to note that apparently there is no legal establishment for TalossaWiki - I don't even know who set it up! Quite apart from the noxious and authoritarian s.7 of this bill, another weakness it shows is that s.4 is entirely in the passive voice - it doesn't say who administers Talossawiki.

If the Government does want to end the ambiguity and place TalossaWiki administration within its competences, this might be a good thing - if it means setting up effective moderation and surveillance, thus removing any excuse for Government Ministers to take citizens to court for disfavored speech.

TalossaWiki has never been administered by the Chancery, it actually was a MinStuff project and theoretically was administered by the same, as long as that ministry existed anyways, although it's always been a pretty hands off thing. In the end, it's mostly been me and the King and a few other changing admins doing the little admin work there was to do.
Sir Lüc da Schir, UrB
Secretary of State / Secretar d'Estat