62nd Cosă 1st Clark - Cosă voting thread

[Sir Lüc]

Members of the Cosă, you can cast your votes on the First Clark here, or at the quasi-Living Cosă on January 11th, or on the database: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/clark/vote

You can find the Clark at: https://database.talossa.com/ziu/clark (database) or at https://wiki.talossa.com/images/e/eb/January2026Clark.pdf (pdf)

If you vote here on Witt, do not indicate any conditions which may make it sound like this vote isn't final: you can always change your vote later.

[Mximo Malt]

Ego attenderam per Sessionem Rustitiscam.

(Éu atendarhéu per la Seßiun Rustitsch.)

[King Txec]

Ego attenderam per Sessionem Rustitiscam.

(Éu atendarhéu per la Seßiun Rustitsch.)

May I ask why you are writing in what looks like Latin as well as Talossan?

-Txec R

[Mximo Malt]

Ego attenderam per Sessionem Rustitiscam.

(Éu atendarhéu per la Seßiun Rustitsch.)

May I ask why you are writing in what looks like Latin as well as Talossan?

-Txec R

I'm using Talossan as a test subject for my Romance experiment (I have a theory that all the Romance "languages" are just badly pronounced dialects of Latin, I'm writing it side by side to prove it)

[Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP]

I, too, will wait until the Informal Session to cast my vote.

[xpb]

My votes for the ► 62nd Cosă 1st Clark

PER regarding 62RZ01    The Public Process Act Redux   
AUS regarding 62RZ02    Advisory Opinion Removal Amendment
AUS regarding 62RZ03    The Túischac'h Casual Vacancy Act
PER regarding 62RZ04    Sense of the Ziu: Restoration of National Honour
CON regarding 62RZ05    Sense of the Ziu: Big Neighbor Democratic Backsliding

ÜC  regarding Vote of Confidence

xpb

[Mic’haglh Autófil, O.Be]

62RZ01: PER. I believe we have gotten a fair compromise made to this bill, and will support it.
62RZ02: CON. Given the opposition to this bill from some individuals with a good deal of experience with our legal system, I cannot support it. I'm open to looking at altering how advisory opinions work, but they appear to still be of use in some form, and this bill deletes them outright.
62RZ03: PER. I have some reservations about the removal threshold being a simple majority, but these can be addressed with additional legislation.
62RZ04: CON. I've made my stance pretty clear on this elsewhere.
62RZ05: AUS. Given the actions taken by the Foreign Ministry under the previous Government, and that the current one has not yet rescinded them, this bill seems somewhat weak compared to the current official position. Frankly, I'm more concerned with trying to stop democratic backsliding in Talossa.

VoC: NON