I'm finding myself in a bit of a situation.
Take a look at the
stress rule for a second. For the sake of transparency, I marked everything that wasnt already a rule under the CÚG in orange.
If no syllable has a stress mark, the primary stress of the word falls on the final syllable that has a vowel with an umlaut, trema or ring (ä, å, ë, ï, ö, ü) or which is followed by a consonant, after ignoring the endings -s, -en(s), -ent(s), -er(s), -esch(en), -eu(x), -ica(s), -ică(s), -ic(i), -(esch)laiset(s), -lor, -mint(s), -p(h)äts and -sqåb(s) in case it has one of those. In the context of this rule, semivocalic ‹i› and ‹u› as well as ‹e› following ‹a› are counted as consonants.
Irregular stress is marked with an accute accent (´). If the irregular stress falls on a word-final vowel, it is marked with a grave accent (`). Vowels that already have a diacritic cannot receive a stress mark (see 1.5.).
In words where the stress rule fails to determine stress, it falls on the first syllable: mici [ˈmiʧi], ricăs [ˈrikəs].
Now, knowing this stress rule, where would you put the stress in
posteic "back door"? Just going by how the rule is phrased, it should be
posteic , but theyre actually supposed to be
posteic (compare the pre-2007 spelling
postéic).
What should we do about that? Should there be another exception in the stressrule for words that end in vowel +
-ic(a/ă/i) or should we respell these words according to the existing rule?
Or perhaps, we should look into coming up with a new and more straightforward stress rule altogether? Please let me know, stuff like this needs immediate fixing.
(EDIT: removed references to -lor words)
