Sense of the Ziu: Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

Whereas, artificial intelligence has rapidly become a transformative force affecting healthcare, industry, climate monitoring, governance, and many other aspects of human life, and

Whereas, the international community has recognized that AI capabilities are expanding faster than internationally agreed governance frameworks, leaving many states and companies outside significant global governance initiatives, and

Whereas, the United Nations General Assembly has recently launched new multilateral initiatives, including the Global Dialogue on AI Governance and the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, intended to foster inclusive international cooperation, evidence-based oversight, and shared standards, and

Whereas, experts widely acknowledge that trustworthy AI ecosystems, responsible innovation, and collaborative international governance are essential for ensuring that artificial intelligence develops safely, sustainably, and inclusively, and

Whereas, fragmented national approaches to AI regulation risk undermining public trust, innovation, and the equitable distribution of AI's benefits worldwide.

Therefore, be it resolved, that it is the Sense of the Ziu of the Kingdom of Talossa that the Ziu affirms that artificial intelligence is a global and humanity-wide public concern requiring cooperative international governance, transparency, and ethical safeguards, and

The Ziu supports the development of inclusive international mechanisms — whether through the United Nations or other multilateral frameworks — to coordinate responsible AI development, risk monitoring, and policy dialogue, and

The Ziu encourages governments, private sector actors, civil society organizations, and scientific communities to collaborate in establishing evidence-based standards that maximize AI's benefits while minimizing social, environmental, and security risks, and

The Ziu expresses its belief that responsible global governance of artificial intelligence is essential to ensuring that technological progress serves humanity as a whole rather than itself or other narrow or destabilizing interests.

Uréu q'estadra så:
Breneir Tzaracomprada (MC-Green)

[xpb]

Read thecon.ai and get back to us.  My interpretation is that either p(Boom) or p(Doom) both only serve to enhance the status of these current text extrusion mechanisms .

[Tric’hard Lenxheir]

Personally I would prefer a worldwide ban on AI

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

Read thecon.ai and get back to us.  My interpretation is that either p(Boom) or p(Doom) both only serve to enhance the status of these current text extrusion mechanisms .

I have been following Geoffrey Hinton (and some of the other globally relevant academics at the University computer science department where I work) for guidance but think that the specific probabilities we assign to the Boom or Doom potential is influenced by the extent to which we effectively and collectively govern its development.

The resolution is less an emphasis on either the Boom or Doom probabilities and more an encouragement toward collective management (global governance) of AI development.