Questions about the Cunstavál referendum

[Sir Lüc]

Azul, I was preparing the database for the election and I noticed that 62RZ15 essentially repeals two arguably desirable provisions (no provincial constitution without a referendum, no provincial laws contradicting OrgLaw/national statute) while leaving untouched the one that I assume its final WHEREAS purported to fix (no same person can be Cunstavál in one province and premier in another).

Am I misunderstanding this?

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

Nope, you're not misunderstanding.  I wanted to also change the last thing, but His Majesty requested that we leave that prohibition in place.  I probably should have deleted that whereas clause, in retrospect.  But it passed overwhelmingly, so I guess it wasn't a fatal flaw.

The changes will eliminate any loophole allowing an extralegal change in a provincial constitution and will eliminate the prospect of a military governor.

[Sir Lüc]

Nope, you're not misunderstanding.  I wanted to also change the last thing, but His Majesty requested that we leave that prohibition in place.  I probably should have deleted that whereas clause, in retrospect.  But it passed overwhelmingly, so I guess it wasn't a fatal flaw.

The changes will eliminate any loophole allowing an extralegal change in a provincial constitution and will eliminate the prospect of a military governor.

Right, to be clear, I understand the double job and "military governor" bits you mentioned. But the amendment also repeals two provisions that I thought made sense, namely, that provincial constitutions may not contravene national statutory/Organic law, and that provincial constitutions may only enter into effect through a referendum with a majority of voters taking part, or failing that, a supermajority in favour.

Am I misreading that those provisions sound desirable to me? You speak of a loophole, but I don't quite get what that would be.