This version of Wittenberg is now the legal national forum for Talossa! Feel free to explore it, and to check out the threads for feedback, requests and criticisms to make sure Wittenberg is tailored to you.

Author Topic: Question for the Avocat-Xheneral  (Read 299 times)

Offline Sir Alexandreu Davinescu

  • Rexhaint d'Ian Regeu/Regent for King John
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 545
  • CONSISTE ET COGITA
    • Talossan since: 6-9-2006

    • View Profile
Question for the Avocat-Xheneral
« on: November 02, 2020, 11:26:17 AM »
S:reu Avocat-Xheneral:

It has been about ten months since the "Appeal of Judgement re: Legality of non-Talossan Name" case.  It is my understanding that the appeal is complete and Senator Pinatsch cannot be in any further jeopardy about the matter, but has anything been undertaken to correct what the appeals cort called "serious errors in law and procedure" in the original decision, either in a judicial or legislative sense?
« Last Edit: November 02, 2020, 05:12:32 PM by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu »
Bitter struggles deform their participants in subtle, complicated ways. ― Zadie Smith
Revolution is an art that I pursue rather than a goal I expect to achieve. ― Robert Heinlein

Offline Miestră Schivă, UrN

  • Prime Minister
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 877
  • Large and In Charge
    • Talossan since: 2004-06-12

    • View Profile
    • Free Democrats of Talossa
Re: Terpelaziun for the Avocat-Xheneral
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2020, 03:24:04 PM »
POINT OF ORDER: Terpelaziuns, as described in El Lexhatx H.2, are for MCs and Senators to ask, not the King or his Appointee.

The Regent is of course perfectly entitled to ask any such questions, but they're not "Terps". Yes, this means that the Minister of STUFF was wrong to rephrase the Regent's questions about the sequelae of the "Guy Incognito" case as a Terp.

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Talossa. Ask me anything.
JOIN THE FREE DEMOCRATS OF TALOSSA - ask me how!

"IS INACTIVITY BAD? I THINK NOT!" - Lord Hooligan

Offline Sir Alexandreu Davinescu

  • Rexhaint d'Ian Regeu/Regent for King John
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 545
  • CONSISTE ET COGITA
    • Talossan since: 6-9-2006

    • View Profile
Re: Question for the Avocat-Xheneral
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2020, 05:13:25 PM »
Title of the thread modified appropriately :-)
Bitter struggles deform their participants in subtle, complicated ways. ― Zadie Smith
Revolution is an art that I pursue rather than a goal I expect to achieve. ― Robert Heinlein

Offline Açafat del Val

  • Citizen
  • Posts: 298
  • Senator for Florencia
    • View Profile
Re: Question for the Avocat-Xheneral
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2020, 01:50:32 PM »
It is the intention of the Ministry of Justice that corrective and affirmative actions be made in the course of "revamping" the OrgLaw and El Lexhatx.

Thus: in the judicial sense, no, but in the legislative sense, yes.
Cheers,

AdV
Senator for Florencia
Jolly Good Fellow of the Royal Talossan College of Arms

Offline Sir Alexandreu Davinescu

  • Rexhaint d'Ian Regeu/Regent for King John
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 545
  • CONSISTE ET COGITA
    • Talossan since: 6-9-2006

    • View Profile
Re: Question for the Avocat-Xheneral
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2020, 11:55:37 AM »
You intend on "revamping" the Organic Law again?  It hasn't been a year since the last "revamp."
« Last Edit: November 11, 2020, 07:02:02 PM by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu »
Bitter struggles deform their participants in subtle, complicated ways. ― Zadie Smith
Revolution is an art that I pursue rather than a goal I expect to achieve. ― Robert Heinlein