Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on July 03, 2024, 11:50:34 PM

Quote from: Eðo Grischun on July 03, 2024, 09:50:44 PMApologies if things have changed since I was last around, and happy to be corrected, but from Article III, Section 5:

Any adult citizen of Vuode may claim a seat in the Estats Xhenerais during the period in which a national general election is taking place. This is done by making a declaration in public as follows: "I, name, hereby claim my right to be seated in the next Grand Session of the Estats Xhenerais". The citizen shall then be officially seated after swearing or affirming oath to the Cunstaval.


Does this mean leaving the claim period open till the 15th would breach this clause? Do claims need to be made before the conclusion of the national election? (I can say as the original author of the clause that the intention was that the period would end upon closing of the national polls).

Although, if we can find a way to argue that I'm wrong on this, I'll be happy seeing the period stay open a bit longer, seeing as it looks like only one person claimed a seat.

Glad you are back hopefully Vuode's future will get brighter with a more experienced leader. We did the best we could without any real leadership

Looking forward to working with you!

We'll need to have a bit of a think about the current situation as it appears we may need to do some legislative tinkering so that I'm not the only person serving as a Councillor for this term.

Quote from: Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB on July 03, 2024, 09:57:09 PMMainly it is because no one from Vuode reminded me that as Cunstaval I have to dissolve and open the General Assembly so it was late. I was running a national election and it didn't cross my mind.

Just posted about it elsewhere.  The Cunstaval isn't required to dissolve the Assembly. It just happens automatically.

In-so-far as an official thread being created to collect seat claims, I believe this may have been a recent custom? However, it isn't strictly required. 

The constitution was written at a time when Vuode had an extremely inactive Constable and so we wrote the document to ensure things didn't rely on human input for many mechanisms.

Article III, Section 3

The States General is instantly and automatically dissolved (and also convened) without interaction required. It would have automatically dissolved when the previous Cosa was dissolved. The next session will automatically begin when the next Cosa is seated. This was by design in case the province ever suffered from an inactive Constable, Premier, or other officer.

Incidentally, I made a seat claim in another thread already.

Apologies if things have changed since I was last around, and happy to be corrected, but from Article III, Section 5:

Any adult citizen of Vuode may claim a seat in the Estats Xhenerais during the period in which a national general election is taking place. This is done by making a declaration in public as follows: "I, name, hereby claim my right to be seated in the next Grand Session of the Estats Xhenerais". The citizen shall then be officially seated after swearing or affirming oath to the Cunstaval.


Does this mean leaving the claim period open till the 15th would breach this clause? Do claims need to be made before the conclusion of the national election? (I can say as the original author of the clause that the intention was that the period would end upon closing of the national polls).

Although, if we can find a way to argue that I'm wrong on this, I'll be happy seeing the period stay open a bit longer, seeing as it looks like only one person claimed a seat.

Checking in.

Quote from: Bentxamì Puntmasleu on December 19, 2023, 11:17:36 PMIn the apparent absence of formal parliamentary procedure (perhaps that is something we could take up next), I would argue it is up Presider Officer @Tric'hard Lenxheir  to determine the nature or the voting period. That said, I suggest we consider this vote concluded unless @Ian Feliceu would like to vote (given that two of three councillors have already voted 'për,' and this bill requires a simple majority to pass, additional votes won't have any actual effect).

Article IV: Passing Legislation
SECTION 3
Each Grand Session of the Estats Xhenerais shall be made of six legislative sessions and shall mirror the schedule of the national Ziu. This includes any months of recess.

I, Eðo Grischun, hereby claim my right to be seated in the next Grand Session of the Estats Xhenerais

Choice 1: Option 1
Choice 2: Option 2
Choice 3: Option 3

Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on September 01, 2023, 06:47:15 PMA lot of my speech to the previous convention seems worth repeating.

QuoteI'll get straight to the point; I think the party might be better off without me in it.

...

I cannot commit to any serious activity in Opposition. I cannot commit to helping to recruit or otherwise grow the party. I do not have new policy ideas, and I will oppose the major Organic reforms that most of this party seems to want.

...

If I stay in the party, I would advocate against major Organic reforms. Everyone else would probably acquiesce to prevent me from leaving, but that would just prevent the party from adopting a platform that could compete against the TNC. In return for giving that up, you will get very little by way of me being active in Opposition.

After this speech, the party stayed away from radical political positions, I remained in it, we didn't do well in the election, we didn't put up a very effective Opposition, and, as promised, I did pretty much nothing politically (except make speeches against some of the Seneschal's more ridiculous bills).

The question before us is whether we can really get energized on a platform of just "Defend the OrgLaw against the TNC" or if the party needs a completely new direction. As much as I would want the former to be true, I am honestly very doubtful.

(I am also a bit doubtful about S:reu Grischun's ability to stay energized and get everyone else energized on his platform, because I feel like I have seen the same song and dance from others before, but I don't mean to be a party pooper. Please prove me wrong).

If the FreeDems embrace Republicanism, I will leave. BUT, I will probably continue doing the same things I otherwise would be doing as a FreeDem member if the party didn't do that and I stayed in it. I'll still be in the Senate to cast my vote in favor of "defending the OrgLaw", and I could at least theoretically run for re-election next year.

This is not to say I really want to have to leave, because I wish more people were "good" Monarchists like I am and that "good Monarchism" was a more winning political idea. However, I have enough macro-national politics in my life now that I honestly don't care deeply about Talossan politics anymore. I care a lot more about the Talossan community, and I suspect that what would be best for the community is for me to get out of the party and stop being a stick in the mud.

I'll answer each post in order, but to all, I have to say, and thank each of you for it, that your responses are very, welcomingly, honest.

To Ian (and I suppose any other FreeDem member that is in some way supportive of the Monarchy) I will say this. It would be with regret that you would feel like you had to leave the party, however I do understand and appreciate why you would. Such an ideological shift as the one I am proposing, I admit, will alienate voters such as yourself. Don't get me wrong as I continue on here as this isn't meant to read like a "fine then, see ya, and don't let the door hit you on the way out" sort of thing. This all really isn't intended to come across like that at all. However, your post was extremely honest, so I'll be extremely honest in return...

My belief is that both Talossa and the FreeDems need revolution, reimagining and reinvention. Where does the nation go from here? Where does the party go from here? If we are of mind to simply remain in existence as a party for the sake of being goalkeepers to the Conservative policies we find ourselves to be disagreeable with, then I believe the party has no real future. We will continue to flounder and diminish. I believe we, as a nation, are heading towards another decade long rule of Conservative, old-boys-club style, rule very similar to the 10+ years of RUMP rule.

I believe, we, as a nation, are holding onto the Monarchy for the sake of holding onto the Monarchy. It seems to me to be an ingrained stubbornness on the part of the vocal Conservative factions and an misguided sense of safety with what we know of the politically apathetic majority.

But, is it fun? Is it even pragmatic? Is it what is best for the nation? As Miestra points out below, I was a defender of the Monarchy in the past, but I no longer believe that the Talossa is best being a Kingdom. It should be a Nation, led and governed by the Nation's people, with alternance factored into every facet of our governance and State.

I could go start a fresh party with this platform, or go join one of the other parties that might be easier convinced of my views. However, I choose the FreeDems as my preferred and first choice as the vehicle to drive the changes and reforms I believe in. I do so because I have faith and confidence in the skills of good governance of the people within the FreeDems (which does include you, Ian), but I do recognise that taking the path I propose is very likely to lead to us watching you walk away.  With the greatest, greatest of respect for you, it is a cost I am willing to pay for what I believe will be a greater return for the nation as a whole.

Azul, fellow Free Democrats, and fellow Talossans,

I will start with a headline rather than working my way up to a finale:

I, Eðo Grischun, hereby announce my candidacy for leadership of the Free Democrats of Talossa to contest this upcoming general election.

If entrusted with the honour of leading our party, I pledge to champion a New Talossan Revolution. A revolution where we shall tirelessly and uncompromisingly advocate for the transformation of our beloved nation into a Parliamentary Republic. Our mission will be clear: to usher in a new era of governance, one marked by Cosa Supremacy, where the legislature emerges as the bedrock of our political landscape. In this new order, the Seneschal, duly elected as the Head of Government, shall lead the executive and political branch of governance, guiding our nation's course with determination and purpose, while accountable and inferior to the Parliament.  Simultaneously, we envision a role for the Head of State as a ceremonial and non-executive President, symbolizing unity and tradition. This President shall also take up the mantle of the nation's ceremonial ambassador and of the apolitical leader of the Civil Service, consolidating the roles of Head of State and Secretary of State.  This shall create a true separation of powers between the functions of the nation that should be purely administrative and external to politics, and the executive functions that are political by nature.  It will also maintain and bolster the autonomy of the civil service by transferring its role to that of the State.

But this is not just a proposition; it's a rallying cry to all Free Democrats and like-minded Talossans. It's time to awaken from our slumber, to cast off complacency, and to embrace a new era of Talossan politics. We shall no longer accept compromise for incremental change or trudge through the muck of conservatism. Under my leadership, our goal will be nothing short of abolishing Talossa's outmoded monarchy in favor of a governance system where the people choose their leaders, their voices, and their representatives.

We are resolved to streamline our government, eliminating redundancy and inefficiency. Our small but vibrant community doesn't require the sprawling apparatus we've grown accustomed to. We pledge to reduce the size of all branches of government, making our system leaner, more accessible, and less prone to dysfunction.

On that particular point, we continue to learn valuable lessons in regards to the fragility of our nation's online infrastructure. We shall prioritize the long-term security of our nation's online assets, putting an end to the challenges we've faced. This commitment to safeguarding our digital infrastructure will be unwavering.

Our mission shall extend to a thorough review and trimming of our legislation, discarding the superfluous to create a more focused and efficient legal framework. We may establish a secondary tier of legislation to house the minutiae, allowing for a clearer and more concise legal system.

Our foremost objective is good governance, solid leadership, and the preservation of our nation's stability and longevity. But beyond that, we must ensure that Talossa is a vibrant and inviting place for all. We want our nation to be a nurturing environment that celebrates creativity and cultural contributions. Talossa should inspire and be inspired, and we're committed to breaking down barriers, eliminating stuffiness, and widening our doors for immigration. Our vision is clear: we aim to create a Talossa that is fun, friendly, and welcoming to all of our citizens.

I now ask my fellow Free Democrats to be prepared, as I am, right now, to campaign, to lead, to govern, to administer, to work, to love our nation, and put the people of Talossa at the heart of everything we do. Together, we shall forge a new path forward, guided by the spirit of unity, progress, and unwavering commitment.

Yours for Talossa,
Yours for a new Talossa,
And Yours for Seneschal of the 59th Cosa,

My name is Eðo Grischun, and I seek your vote for leadership of the Free Democrats.

Bump. 

Are the citizens of MM and VD open to this?

Point of order.

My name appears to be missing from the list.

I, Éovart Grischun, hereby claim my right to be seated in the next Grand Session of the Estats Xhenerais.

I think we are doing our usual thing here and over-complicating things.

Would a simple 'breach of the peace' law work?  Make it a criminal offence to cause other Talossans alarm and distress?  Probably inOrganic, but is it worth exploring?