The Keeping the Far More Progressive Law Progressive Bill

[Viteu]

This entire manufactured outrage of someone equating being an a*sh*le with masculinity sounds pretty #NotAllMen to me.

1. My offense isn't manufactured just as, I assume, your offense at "gay erasure" isn't manufactured.
2. Taking offense is not the same as being outraged. Words have meanings.

1. oooookkkkaaayyy #NotAllMen

2. Kewl.

[Viteu]

This entire manufactured outrage of someone equating being an a*sh*le with masculinity sounds pretty #NotAllMen to me.

My advice was to not be "outraged" about this, but if someone was, I don't think they'd be manufacturing anything. There are an abundance of examples of it happening, but again, they are of no importance.

If it doesn't apply to you as you might presuppose, then why are you responding?

[Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB]

Gentlemen,

This is a hopper thread and discussion about a bill under consideration. Please keep the discussion on that topic. The last few posts threaten to derail the thread.

[Üc R. Tärfă]

I can't precisely recollect where the discussion went before the first data loss, but in the coming days I'll update the proposal.

[Breneir Tzaracomprada]

I can't precisely recollect where the discussion went before the first data loss, but in the coming days I'll update the proposal.

Are you planning on submitting this for the second Clark?

[Üc R. Tärfă]

I can't precisely recollect where the discussion went before the first data loss, but in the coming days I'll update the proposal.

Are you planning on submitting this for the second Clark?

Not sure, possibly third Clark.

[Üc R. Tärfă]

Update just to be clear: I will follow on this Bill the same "waiting period" I asked on this other bill.