[CRL] The Appeals Act

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

WHEREAS there's no limit on appeals, so no case is ever really closed unless every appeal is exhausted, and

WHEREAS it's wildly unjust for a resolved case to hang over someone's head indefinitely, and

WHEREAS the corts have not established a rule about this[/i]

THEREFORE a new provision shall be inserted as the fifth subsubsection to the first subsection of the third section of Title G of el Lexhatx, reading

There is a 90-day statute of limitations on all appeals.

Uréu q'estadra så:
Baron Alexandreu Davinescu (MC-TNC)

Posted for approval by the CRL.  It has a different name, but the substance is unchanged from a previous iteration that's ripe for the CRL.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

I approve it, of course.

[Sir Lüc]

Could you link me to the previous iteration of the bill that you're speaking of?

Edit: nevermind, I found it.

[esbornatfiglheu]

With no substantive change, it looks like it'll do what you want it to.

Approved, Clark it.

[Sir Lüc]

I understand that this bill, as posted here, was part of a larger bill that was regularly Hoppered and later broken up.

My vote doesn't make a difference at this point, but in my mind this piece of legislation was never Hoppered and, while it has no issues in form, the CRL shouldn't be able to approve a bill that did not go through regular order in the Hopper.

My objection doesn't apply to the Legal Repair Amendment posted in parallel to this, as it shares the name of the original Hoppered bill.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

Well, I don't want to break regular order, and I can see your point.  I will withdraw it from the Clark.

[Sir Lüc]

Thank you. To be clear, I'm mostly concerned about not setting a precedent that could be abused later; I'm not disputing that this bill's substance was properly debated.

[Baron Alexandreu Davinescu]

Thank you. To be clear, I'm mostly concerned about not setting a precedent that could be abused later; I'm not disputing that this bill's substance was properly debated.

That was how I understood it  :)