Welcome to Wittenberg!

Author Topic: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment  (Read 4261 times)

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« on: December 16, 2019, 11:30:39 AM »
WHEREAS Interest in Talossa is not hereditary, and

WHEREAS The best person to become the next Monarch is usually not going to be the child of the previous one



THEREFORE Article II of the Organic Law is repealed and replaced with the following:

Section 1
Quote
The Kingdom of Talossa is a constitutional Monarchy with a King (or, if female, Queen) as its head of State.

Section 2
Quote
The King is the symbolic head of the nation. The nation democratically grants the King certain Royal Powers and duties as described in this Organic Law and in statute law. The Ziu may establish procedures for when the King fails to perform a duty.

Section 3
Quote
The King of Talossa is King John I, until his demise, abdication, or removal from the throne. Should the King at any time renounce or lose his citizenship, that renunciation or loss shall be deemed to imply his abdication of the Throne. Upon the demise, abdication, or removal from the Throne of the King, the Uppermost Cort shall be a Council of Regency.

Section 4
Quote
In dire circumstances, when the King is judged by competent medical authority to be incapable of executing his duties, or if he is convicted by the Talossan Uppermost Cort of violation of this Organic Law, treason, bribery, nonfeasance endangering the safety, order or good government of the Kingdom, or other high crimes, the nation may remove the King from the Throne. The Cosa shall pronounce by a two-thirds vote, with the approval of the Senäts, that the King is to be removed, and this pronouncement shall immediately be transmitted to the people for their verdict in a referendum. If a two-thirds majority of the people concur, the King is removed.

Section 5
Quote
The King may, at whim, appoint, replace, or remove a Regent (or a Council of Regency, which is considered equivalent to a Regent), who shall administer the government in the name of the King, and exercise all powers Organically or legally vested in the King, except the power to appoint or replace a Regent. No person not a citizen of Talossa shall be competent to serve as Regent or member of a Council of Regency. The Ziu may by law remove or replace any appointed Regent, and if the Ziu removes a Regent appointed by the King, the King may not reappoint the same person Regent without the prior consent of the Ziu.

Section 6
Quote
The King may grant titles of nobility and confer awards and decorations.

Ureu q'estadra så:
HM Government, represented by Ian Plätschisch (Distain)
« Last Edit: April 27, 2020, 10:16:14 PM by Ian Plätschisch »

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2019, 11:36:58 AM »
The above is a little hard to digest, so here would be the amended text of Article II:

Section 1
Quote
The Kingdom of Talossa is a constitutional Monarchy with a King (or, if female, Queen) as its head of State.

Section 2
Quote
The King is the symbolic head of the nation. The nation democratically grants the King certain Royal Powers and duties as described in this Organic Law and in statute law. The Ziu may establish procedures for when the King fails to perform a duty.

Section 3
Quote
The King of Talossa is King John I, until his demise, abdication, or removal from the throne. Should the King at any time renounce or lose his citizenship, that renunciation or loss shall be deemed to imply his abdication of the Throne. Upon the demise, abdication, or removal from the Throne of the King, the Uppermost Cort shall be a Council of Regency.

Section 4
Quote
In dire circumstances, when the King is judged by competent medical authority to be incapable of executing his duties, or if he is convicted by the Talossan Uppermost Cort of violation of this Organic Law, treason, bribery, nonfeasance endangering the safety, order or good government of the Kingdom, or other high crimes, the nation may remove the King from the Throne. The Cosa shall pronounce by a two-thirds vote, with the approval of the Senäts, that the King is to be removed, and this pronouncement shall immediately be transmitted to the people for their verdict in a referendum. If a two-thirds majority of the people concur, the King is removed.

Section 5
Quote
The King may, at whim, appoint, replace, or remove a Regent (or a Council of Regency, which is considered equivalent to a Regent), who shall administer the government in the name of the King, and exercise all powers Organically or legally vested in the King, except the power to appoint or replace a Regent. No person not a citizen of Talossa shall be competent to serve as Regent or member of a Council of Regency. The Ziu may by law remove or replace any appointed Regent, and if the Ziu removes a Regent appointed by the King, the King may not reappoint the same person Regent without the prior consent of the Ziu.

Section 6
Quote
The King may grant titles of nobility and confer awards and decorations.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2020, 10:15:22 PM by Ian Plätschisch »

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2019, 11:37:56 AM »
Also note that this amendment would amend the new version of the Organic Law

Offline Magniloqueu Épiqeu Ac’hlerglünä da Lhiun

  • Citizen
  • Posts: 38
  • Verissimis fabulis numquam narrare erunt.
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2019, 04:48:31 PM »
I wonder whether electing a Monarch should really be a “Ziu → Ratification”-style process.

Might we want to involve the knighthood? Maybe they come together to choose a new King that has to be ratified by the populace? Or something?
Mîmbreu Xhugnhör da l'Avocatür Rexhital

I support the “United Provinces of Maritiimi-Maxhestic, Vuode, and Dandenburg.”

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2019, 05:07:26 PM »
I wonder whether electing a Monarch should really be a “Ziu → Ratification”-style process.

Might we want to involve the knighthood? Maybe they come together to choose a new King that has to be ratified by the populace? Or something?
Interesting to consider (Right now, this amendment keeps everything else status quo)

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2020, 07:59:55 PM »
What do people think of this?

Offline Miestră Schivă, UrN

  • Prime Minister
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 752
  • Large and In Charge
    • Talossan since: 2004-06-12

    • View Profile
    • Free Democrats of Talossa
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2020, 08:52:59 PM »
Well, I'm totally opposed to giving "the Knighthood" any extra votes. That just gives the King the ability to choose his own electorate.

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Talossa. Ask me anything.

"IS INACTIVITY BAD? I THINK NOT!" - Lord Hooligan
"It probably would be a bit helpful if you resigned and became inactive..." - Sir A. Davinescù

luc

  • Guest
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2020, 07:38:39 AM »
It would be interesting if we had our own Conclave-style process, separate from the Ziu, which could elect a King with a 2/3 vote or something similar (maybe 3/5 and then 1/2 after a number of ballots).

Not sure how we would elect such a body, though, so here's some ideas:

1. By seniority groups: we divide up the population into N equal groups based on date of citizenship, and each group elects X representatives to the Conclave (example N=4 and X=5, we have 20 representatives and roughly 38 electors per group);

2. 8 MCs (proportional-ish between parties) + 8 Senators + 5 Justices + SoS + 2 other senior positions = 24 electors

I'm indifferent enough on the Conclave "electing" or "nominating for approval" the future King. Either works for me I think.

Offline Miestră Schivă, UrN

  • Prime Minister
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 752
  • Large and In Charge
    • Talossan since: 2004-06-12

    • View Profile
    • Free Democrats of Talossa
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2020, 04:37:51 PM »
The simplistic answer would be: the Ziu on a one-individual-one-vote basis.

A more complex answer would be the Ziu + provincial delegates, on a one-individual-one-vote basis.

Final decision would have to be approved by the nation by 2/3 in referendum.

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Talossa. Ask me anything.

"IS INACTIVITY BAD? I THINK NOT!" - Lord Hooligan
"It probably would be a bit helpful if you resigned and became inactive..." - Sir A. Davinescù

Offline Glüc da Dhi S.H.

  • Posts: 391
  • Taking a break from Talossa
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2020, 11:01:50 AM »
I'm really not convinced this is a good idea at all.

But if we absolutely have to, I think we should avoid any of the following:

- Anything that results in citizens joining thinking that they might one day become King.
- Anyone campaigning to become King.
- Anyone taking up civil service duties because it might make them King someday.
- Any parties campaigning to make their members King.
- Electing anyone we are not sure will be around for a long time (I can honestly think of very few Talossans who have been as consistently present for such a long time as King John). The best way to ensure this also means not...
- Electing anyone who hasn't already been around for a long time.
- A method that is so straightforward (or I guess simplistic) that it essentially turns the King into just another elected office.
- A method that results in someone being elected based on the hype of the day rather than long term appreciation (remember this is supposed to be an appointment for life.)
« Last Edit: February 16, 2020, 03:12:28 AM by Glüc »

Offline Açafat del Val

  • Citizen
  • Posts: 232
  • Senator for Florencia
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2020, 01:49:49 PM »
I very much support this amendment, though Glüc has a point that the throne, while we have it, should not be politicized.

Perhaps we could amend this amendment so that the Ziu cannot choose a successor who has not been a citizen for X years? That alone should prevent phonies. 5 years? 7 years?

Let us not live in a fantasy: the ascension of John to the throne was political, insofar as any decision to elevate someone to a lifetime role is inherently political. It's not practicable to try to prevent "someone being elected based on the hype of the day rather than a long-term appreciation"; that's just the nature of the beast.

The risk of a bad ascension to the throne is worth removing the hereditary status of the King.

Offline Miestră Schivă, UrN

  • Prime Minister
  • Citizen
  • Posts: 752
  • Large and In Charge
    • Talossan since: 2004-06-12

    • View Profile
    • Free Democrats of Talossa
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2020, 04:16:58 PM »
I think we should avoid any of the following:

- Anything that results in citizens joining thinking that they might one day become King.
- Anyone campaigning to become King.
- Anyone taking up civil service duties because it might make them King someday.
- Any parties campaigning to make their members King.

Agreed.

Quote
- Electing anyone we are not sure will be around for a long time (I can honestly think of very few Talossans who have been as consistently present for such a long time as King John). The best way to ensure this also means not...
- Electing anyone who hasn't already been around for a long time.

John had been a Talossan for 2-3 years before he became King. This was one of the main reasons why the Republic were aghast to find out that he was being proposed for the Slightly Battered Throne, despite his obvious qualities, considering he was a newcomer compared to the people who founded the Republic.

Quote
- A method that results in someone being elected based on the hype of the day rather than long term appreciation (remember this is supposed to be an appointment for life.)

See above. Many of the things you're complaining about are how the incumbent got there.

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Talossa. Ask me anything.

"IS INACTIVITY BAD? I THINK NOT!" - Lord Hooligan
"It probably would be a bit helpful if you resigned and became inactive..." - Sir A. Davinescù

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2020, 04:00:46 PM »
I'm really not convinced this is a good idea at all.

But if we absolutely have to, I think we should avoid any of the following:

- Anything that results in citizens joining thinking that they might one day become King.
- Anyone campaigning to become King.
- Anyone taking up civil service duties because it might make them King someday.
- Any parties campaigning to make their members King.
- Electing anyone we are not sure will be around for a long time (I can honestly think of very few Talossans who have been as consistently present for such a long time as King John). The best way to ensure this also means not...
- Electing anyone who hasn't already been around for a long time.
- A method that is so straightforward (or I guess simplistic) that it essentially turns the King into just another elected office.
- A method that results in someone being elected based on the hype of the day rather than long term appreciation (remember this is supposed to be an appointment for life.)

I agree that if any of this happened it would not be great, but it would still be better than the current situation, which is a Prince of Prospect who has not demonstrated one iota of interest in Talossa for years.

Offline Ian Plätschisch

  • Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2020, 04:02:21 PM »
Are all of the proposals for more complex election processes more along the lines of "woah dude, what if we..." or should I actually incorporate them into the amendment.

I kept the election process the same in order to avoid making a huge omnibus change.

Offline Glüc da Dhi S.H.

  • Posts: 391
  • Taking a break from Talossa
    • View Profile
Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« Reply #14 on: February 29, 2020, 05:24:30 AM »
Are all of the proposals for more complex election processes more along the lines of "woah dude, what if we..." or should I actually incorporate them into the amendment.

I kept the election process the same in order to avoid making a huge omnibus change.
This is gonna be a huge change regardless.

I would seriously consider actually incorporating some of the ideas that have been raised here and some others that have not yet been raised as well.

Really disappointing that we're going for possibly the worst option when a lot of the alternatives haven't really been thought out.