The "It's The Immigration, Stupid" Act

[Sir Ian Plätschisch]

OK, I have made the update.

I admit that I have not kept up with the changes to the Hopper/CRL requirements as closely as I should have; will this bill be eligible for the February Clark?

[Miestră Schivă, UrN]

I don't see why not

[Miestră Schivă, UrN]

I mean, the way the rules are written is that the CRL only has to look at a bill once, no matter how many times it's amended after that. Do people think we should change things so that they have to sign off on the final to-be-Clarked bill?

[Açafat del Val]

I mean, the way the rules are written is that the CRL only has to look at a bill once, no matter how many times it's amended after that. Do people think we should change things so that they have to sign off on the final to-be-Clarked bill?

Very yes.

[King Txec]

I mean, the way the rules are written is that the CRL only has to look at a bill once, no matter how many times it's amended after that. Do people think we should change things so that they have to sign off on the final to-be-Clarked bill?

Very yes.

Please avoid violating the rules of Wittiquette, including this rule:

Wildly excessive use of capitalisation, large fonts, colours, moving items, symbols, swearwords, gibberish, etc.