News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Viteu

#1
Wittenberg / Bye.
May 16, 2023, 09:34:04 AM
1. I am right that under the 2017 Organic Law, the CpI has the authority to recognize crimes at common law (Seventh Covenant) and has the sole right to impose the sentence of revocation (Twelfth Covenant).  Neither the Seventh Covenant nor Twelfth Covenant contain any provision akin to "The Ziu Shall have the power to enforce this Covenant by appropriate legislation." Which is the very line that moron Tärfă hangs his hat on.  Tärfă entire argument that the Ziu somehow gets to interpret what is cruel and unusual punishment to claim that this includes revocation of citizenship is not only stupid, it's laughable—the Org Law already allows that punishment, it is not subject to the whims of the Ziu. But keep thinking this is a wilder legal theory, Meistra. Let us not forget that you flunked out of law school. I graduated at the top of class.
 
2. The reality is that the 1997 Organic Law required a citizen to participate in an election to avoid the two-strikes rule.  Abstention counted as participation. The referendum was tied into the election. Therefore, abstaining counted as the overall number of people participating in the referendum.

3. Why did I not raise the referendum sooner? Because Miestra expressly told me not to.  She said, "but leave out the issue of the referendum[.]" If she were so confident in her position, why did she tell me to leave that out?

4. How did I handle the Fifth Covenant? I got the Fifth Covenant fixed.

5. None of you really want to take Talossa seriously.  This is akin to Model UN in school. It's a low-level larp.  The mere fact that you're all ostensibly okay with trashing civil liberties and steamrolling of a defendant because you don't like his macronational level crime is disgusting.

6. Miestra, this is at you—you're a disgusting excuse for a person. How quickly you cycle through political allies based on whether they're useful to you tells me the character of your person.  I wish nothing but the worst possible future for you.

7. Tärfă, you're just an idiot.

8. Gluc, you're also a moron. 

9. FreeDems, good luck EVER winning an election again.


I resign my seat on the Uppermost Cort, and I resign my citizenship. Talossa doesn't deserve me. Good luck playing your game. There, you can all celebrate my departure from this shitshow.
#2
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 16, 2023, 09:15:54 AM
Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on May 16, 2023, 01:05:30 AMHello, I just had my morning coffee.
This is getting ridiculous.

I just read that in the last hour a sitting Judge of the CpI stormed a courthouse, bullied and threatened a sitting Judge of the Tribunal on the verge of sentencing, threatened a Public Defender, founded a Political Party to "defend" the OrgLaw (the same OrgLaw he's ditching), posted private conversations with a citizen without permission, threatened more and more, de facto, the Ziu, and now announced to the world that our own constitution that came into force 3 years ago is a joke.

For what is worth, all I can see in that private conversation improperly shared now as a sort of trophy is a sitting Judge of the CpI believing - and who still believes now by its own admission - that the Organic Law he should judge upon is a joke, and that for three years this Country allegedly run on a piece of paper without any legal value. I'd like at this point to read what he testified in the Senäts Committee on this matter.

I dearly miss the time when our Judiciary was not bullying, storming, possibly breaking the laws and threatening the citizens and the institutions he might be asked to judge upon sometimes.

Lol and the freedems posting a private Facebook status on Witt is okay? Wow you people play games.

It's all good. I'm leaving this shitshow of a country anyway.
#3
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 11:03:38 PM
It was Miestra.
#4
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 10:28:38 PM
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 15, 2023, 10:08:44 PM
Quote from: Viteu on May 15, 2023, 10:07:01 PM90 people participated in the election by voting, therefore the number is 90.
No.

Abstaining is by its very nature non-participation.

The fact that it establishes that the voter was present does not change that.

No. If Abstention means participation for the purpose of two-strike, then it necessarily means participation in the referendum.

Not sorry, but your org law failed. And Miestra tried to hide it, like she took a few months to report CCX. After all, she sat on that since February.
#5
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 10:07:01 PM
90 people participated in the election by voting, therefore the number is 90.

Also, if abstaining is sufficient to count against two strikes, it inherently means doing do is participating in the vote. As the referendum was tied to the election, you needed an supermajority of participant's, ie 70.
#6
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 09:28:30 PM
I, too, can post a screenshot.

Link

Because the FreeDems like to play games.
#7
I will not be pursuing any action or filing a complaint against the GC Judge.
#8
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 07:59:56 PM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on May 15, 2023, 07:55:48 PMSo I suppose the actual name of the new party is "The 1997 Organic Law Party"?

We'll see what others say.
#9
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 07:52:04 PM
Love the games the FreeDems are playing. Let's do this @Miestră Schivă, UrN.
#10
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 07:51:08 PM
I
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on May 15, 2023, 07:48:41 PMI thought I might put something on the record in case the public were thinking that Judge V quit the Free Democrats of Talossa in response to my conduct as Public Defender in the current case. In fact, he quit the Free Democrats of Talossa on May 1 this year, in response to Party President Üc Tärfa's arguments in favour of the Legal Repair Amendment.

On the 6th of May, a few days later, we saw this on his personal Facebook page:

You cannot view this attachment.

I suppose we all get to see what "going nuclear" means now.


Fine. Let's do this.

Who wants to talk about how the 2017 Organic Law wasn't actually adopted?
#12
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 07:09:58 PM
Quote from: Glüc da Dhi S.H. on May 15, 2023, 07:04:36 PMOooh, another satirical party. Nice!

No more a joke than the FreeDems.
#13
Wittenberg / Re: The Organic Law Party
May 15, 2023, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Glüc da Dhi S.H. on May 15, 2023, 07:04:36 PMOooh, another satirical party. Nice!

If you say so.
#14
Quote from: Üc R. Tärfă on May 15, 2023, 06:57:52 PMThe public defender has managed to reduce the counts for the defendant from 3 to 2. What else she can do apart from contesting that the defendant has been convicted by the Swansea Crown Court of the crimes he plead guilty to?

Because that is the charge: having been convicted by the Swansea Crown Court of the crimes the defendant plead guilty to.

You're arguing merits and have completely missed the points. 
#15
It is appropriate for an attorney to move to be appointed as counsel when the public defender and the Cort are acting as the prosecutor. File charges for contempt of Cort. I will also be filing an ethics complaint against the judge and seeking his impeachment for abuse of process.

Calling you out, @Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB.  Bring the charges. Give me a reason to sue you for violation of civil liberties and abuse of process.