Welcome to Wittenberg!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Açafat del Val

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 18
Wittenberg / Recommendation of Appointments of Justices of the Peace
« on: April 30, 2020, 08:35:58 PM »
To all who may see this, Azul!

In pursuance to the powers vested in me as the incumbent Avocat-Xheneral by Section G.13 of El Lexhátx, having been thoroughly and definitively satisfied of their knowledge of Talossan law and jurisprudence, and of their good character, I do hereby recommend, endorse, and nominate to the King for appointment as Justices of the Peace the honourable Miestrâ Schiva, UrN, and our esteemed friend Magniloqueu Épiqeu Ac’hlerglünä da Lhiun.

In testimony whereof,
on this day the thirtieth of April,
in the year of our Lord the two thousand twenty,
and of the independence of the Kingdom of Talossa the forty-first,
I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed my official seal.

The Lobby / Re: Nomination to the UC
« on: April 30, 2020, 08:13:09 PM »
I am willing (and perhaps will be able) to undertake the leadership of another hearing. However, I would need the contact information of all involved parties.

The Lobby / Re: Call for bills - 54th Cosa, 5th Clark - May 2020
« on: April 30, 2020, 08:11:24 PM »
I'd like to clark the following:

-- Judiciary Amendment of 2020
-- The Uniform Seneschál Election Act
-- The Uniform Túischac'h Election Act

The Hopper / Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« on: April 20, 2020, 03:23:43 PM »

OK, how about this as a starting point for discussion

-Nominations are put forward by a committee composed of all Talossans who have been a citizen for longer than 7 years.
-Nominations must be approved by 2/3 of both houses
-Confirmation in a referendum

In particular tagging @Glüc da Dhi S.H.

This proposal specifically? Okay. So what do you have against changing 7 years to 6, and modifying the referendum to require 3/5 approval instead of a simple majority?

For what it's worth (and I did read the reasons why), I also don't think that a 'committee' would work very well. Who selects the committee? And wouldn't that process be as political if not more political than merely leaving the choice to the Ziu? Perhaps the committee could be comprised of certain officials (the Senior Judge, the Mencei, etc.), but then everyone else would feel left out.

The Cosa is accessible to everyday Talossans. If someone wants a voice in choosing the next King, they simply can become an MC. Plus the fact that the choice is ultimately approved (or rejected) by a referendum anyways.

It would seem so much better to just leave the nominations to the Ziu, i.e. members of the Cosa and Senate, rather than mire the process under more bureaucracy under the guise of 'fairness' or 'inclusivity'.

The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Túischac'h Election Act
« on: April 20, 2020, 02:58:06 PM »
Then... why did you vote on a current bill which also causes the Túischac'h to be elected?

Për on all

Obviously you're okay with having the Túischac'h elected rather than appointed. Ergo, what would be your critiques of this bill?

The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Seneschál Election Act
« on: April 20, 2020, 10:27:43 AM »
Below is a revised version to reflect the 2017 Organic Law.


WHEREAS, the current Government agreed to submit various Organic Law reforms to the current Ziu, including a provision for the Seneschál to be nominated by the Cosâ prior to appointment by the King;

WHEREAS, the Seneschál should be elected by the people of Talossa, and not appointed by the King;

WHEREAS, this is a cumbersome endeavor and requires sweeping reforms throughout the OrgLaw and other laws; and,

WHEREAS, this bill is hopefully the best compromise between all parties,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED by the King, Cosâ and Senäts of Talossa in Ziu assembled that:

(1) All references to a "Prime Minister" in the Organic Law and any other laws in effect shall be made to refer instead to the Seneschál, to wit:

(a) Section 2 of Article III of the Organic Law is so amended as follows:

Except as otherwise provided in this Organic Law, any Talossan eligible to vote may be elected or appointed to the Senäts, but only for his or her own province. No Senator, even though elected or appointed to the Senäts, may actually vote his seat until he has been a citizen for one year, or served for six months as Seneschál or Secretary of State, or received an order of knighthood from the King. No person may simultaneously hold more than one seat in the Senäts.

(b) Section 6 of Article VII of the Organic Law is so amended as follows:

The Seneschál shall have the right at his discretion to withdraw any legislative proposal from the Hopper and instruct the Secretary of State to treat it as a properly submitted bill.

(c) The Scribery of Talossa is instructed, and shall have an express power and duty, to replace in El Lexhatx with "Seneschál" any and all references to a "Prime Minister", or therein with "Distáin" any and all references to a "Deputy Prime Minister", as according to fair reason and context.

(2) Section 8 of Article IV of the Organic Law, which concerns warrants of prorogation, is repealed in whole and the subsequent sections of the same Article are accordingly renumbered.

(3) The entirety of Article VI of the Organic Law, which concerns the Government, is replaced in whole with the following:


Section 1
The head of the Government is the Prime Minister, who shall be known otherwise as the Seneschál. Any Talossan, except for the King of Talossa, shall be eligible to be the Seneschál.

Section 2
The Seneschál shall be elected directly by the Cosâ, and his term shall expire upon the installation of his successor. He shall maintain the confidence of a majority of the Cosâ alone in order to hold the office.

Section 3
The Seneschál has duties of the State. He may advise the King to dissolve the Cosâ and to appoint and remove members of the Cabinet, and such advice to the King shall not be refused. He may also declare war and write treaties with the approval of the Ziu, expedite the Ziu's consideration of legislation, and issue Prime Dictates.

Section 4
Prime Dictates (PDs) are public declarations which affect government policy and have the force of law. They take effect upon their countersignature by the King and function as laws for all purposes, with such exceptions and subject to such conditions as the Ziu may enact by statute. Prime Dictates are exempt from all provisions relating unto legislative proposals, but may never be used to amend this Organic Law.

Section 5
The election of a Seneschál shall be the sole and exclusive business of the first Clark of every newly seated Ziu, but neither a member of the Senäts nor the King may vote on the matter. The Senäts may undertake during such Clark any of their business for which the consent of the Cosâ or the King be not requisite.

The method of election of a Seneschál shall be Ranked Choice Voting. Each member of the Cosâ shall have as many votes in the election as the seats which he hold in the Cosâ, but shall cast his votes as one bloc and have no divided conscience. The candidates for each such election shall be only the recognized and commonly known leader of each political party which shall have earned representation in the Cosâ at the most recent general election.

No member of the Cosâ may abstain in the election of a Seneschál, and shall rank on his ballot at least two distinct preferences, which itself shall be made public.

Whichever candidate shall have earned a majority of the votes in his election, as according to the method of Ranked Choice Voting, shall be appointed subsequently and forthwith by the King to serve as Seneschál, and the results of the election shall be published at large in the Clark.

Section 6
The second Clark of every Ziu may entertain business as normal, but especially shall occur after a month of recess following the first Clark. The Seneschál shall have the express duty during the said month of recess to form a government and prepare their legislative agenda, and shall announce publicly both the roster and the agenda at least before, if not sooner than, the last day on which a member of the Ziu may submit a measure to the second Clark.

Section 7
No election for the Seneschál shall occur, except during the first Clark of a newly seated Ziu.

Section 8
The Seneschál shall appoint a member of the Government to be the Deputy Prime Minister, who shall be known otherwise as the Distáin. The Distáin shall act in place of the Seneschál in case of absence or disability of the latter, and shall become the Seneschál in case of death, removal or resignation. The Ziu may establish by law the procedures and standards in order to determine the absence or disability of the Seneschál, as well as the manner or conditions by which the Distáin shall be appointed.

Section 9
The King appoints and dismisses members of the Government (Cabinet) on the advice of the Seneschal. The Government consists of the Seneschal, the Distáin, and various other ministers as set by law or appointed as the Seneschal sees fit.

Section 10
Cabinet Ministers are responsible to the Seneschal, whom they advise and from whom they receive direction, and exercise state power with his consent.

Section 11
Whenever the Government should lose the confidence of the Cosâ by a formal vote, the same Government shall remain in offce as caretakers until a new Seneschál shall be duly installed.

(4) Section 7 of Article IV of the Organic Law is so amended as follows:

A newly elected Ziu shall convene on the first day of the month after its general election, to coincide with the publication of the first Clark. Its term shall be equal to seven Clarks, subject to the provisions elsewhere in this Organic Law. During its last month, the King shall issue a Writ of Dissolution ending its term. Whenever the Cosâ may be dissolved, all its members shall resign.

(5) Those provisions of this Act which affect the Organic Law shall be put to a referendum of the people of Talossa together, to be answered therein as one single Organic amendment.

(6) Those provisions of this Act which do not affect the Organic Law shall take effect immediately upon the enactment hereof, severable and separate from those provisions and not answerable by a referendum.

(7) Those phrases, clauses, paragraphs, sections, or other manners of any law or any source of law which contravene the provisions of this Act shall be severed and nullified upon the effectuation hereof, whether by enactment or referendum, but only to the extent of and not beyond such contravention.

The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Seneschál Election Act
« on: April 20, 2020, 09:47:49 AM »
You also accidentally removed the power of prorogation from the king, and also accidentally forgot to mention that significant shift in the checks and balances of our system.

The removal of the power of prorogation was not accidental; it was intentional. I see that the only vehicle for a Warrant of Prorogation is to delay a Clark in order to form a government or the like. Under this bill, that would be a needlessly redundant mechanism, because there would be already an automatic month of recess for exactly this purpose.

Why else should the King want to prorogue the Ziu anyways? Or should the King have a unilateral ability to prorogue the Ziu at any time for any reason? If so, we might have a different definition of 'democratic parliamentary monarchy'.

As for the "shift in checks and balances"... What would this bill cause which is not already a reality? Name a time in any parliamentary or semi-presidential system when the head of state did NOT appoint a prime minister who would control the majority of the lower house. In other words, having the Seneschal elected directly by the Cosa is practicably no different than having the Seneschal appointed by the King; it's the same result.

On the other hand, are you proposing that the King have the option to appoint a Seneschal who would not command the confidence of the Cosa? If so, we might have again a different definition of 'democratic parliamentary monarchy'.

The Hopper / Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« on: April 19, 2020, 09:27:07 PM »
"A more established process", such as?

The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Seneschál Election Act
« on: April 19, 2020, 09:26:28 PM »
Before I comment on the content of the bill, I will point out that it amends a version of the OrgLaw that is no longer in force.

But I spent more than several hours cross-referencing > http://wiki.talossa.com/Law:Organic_Law < in order to make this bill :-(

Where is the current version, then? Nevermind... I guess that I didn't use my own eyeballs... http://wiki.talossa.com/2017_Organic_Law

Okay, well, back the drawing board.

The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Túischac'h Election Act
« on: April 19, 2020, 09:24:38 PM »
I would argue that if the Speaker is already one of their own members, let alone their own presiding officer... It would be their choice in the first place whether to elect the Speaker or not.

Do you support the bill, or maybe make some changes?

The Hopper / Re: Judiciary Amendment of 2020
« on: April 19, 2020, 09:20:14 PM »
Okay. I have finally read through the entirety of this. There are some stylistic changes that I personally would make (add a comma here, swap clauses there, modify a few modal verbs, etc.), but I also really like the idea that this would be V's last bill before joining the UC and he would get to influence the OrgLaw so positively. Therefore, I mick it wholly.

How may we put this on the next Clark? Am I authorized to do so, even though I am not its sponsor? Please let this be a notice to the Secretary of State that I wish to put this on May's Clark as it is presented in the first post of this thread.

The Hopper / Re: The Non-Hereditary Monarchy Amendment
« on: April 19, 2020, 08:59:01 PM »
I see that this did not make it to the most present Clark. In which case, may I offer two changes?

First, that the Ziu may not elevate to the throne any person who has not been a citizen of Talossa for 6 consecutive years at least.

Second, that such choice be ratified by the nation in referendum, but by three fifths of those voting (instead of a mere majority).

I'd like to ask these questions again. The current bill as it was proposed in the first post of this thread + the two suggestions above = success ???

The Hopper / Re: The NCC Redux Act
« on: April 19, 2020, 08:55:42 PM »
One suggestion for style: Instead of "shall work to attempt to increase quality and quantity", just "shall work to increase".

There are good intentions in here, but I am worried that it's extra bureaucratic burden. I imagine someone less dedicated than you, and I am worried that they would fall short of these mandates. Do we want another Secretary of State, i.e. a thankless job that requires a lot for little in return? If so, should we perhaps transfer this role from the Cabinet to the Civil Service, like the Chancery?

The Hopper / Re: The Seneschál Election Amendment - revised
« on: April 19, 2020, 06:19:01 PM »
I have put up instead of shutting up :-)


The Hopper / Re: The Uniform Seneschál Election Act
« on: April 19, 2020, 06:18:32 PM »
This is by no means perfect, and ultimately I believe that the entire OrgLaw should be rewritten. Having said that, this is my best efforts for all intents and purposes. Please say if you see a technical, grammatical, or other such error.

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 18