Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on April 13, 2024, 09:30:38 AMWe should fix the succession so that it will continue working for the future in a permanent way that has consensus support. Once the institution is assured to continue existing in a legitimate manner, we can address other problems. Doing it backwards is risky and bizarre.We could (possibly) "fix the succession" merely by changing the stated order of choice. For example, we could replace "eldest offspring of current monarch (etc. etc.)" with "list of citizens arranged in such-and-such an order". In other words, create a different rule of precedence.
Such a rule would have to be explicit and unambiguous; it would have to allow for the choice of monarch to be denied by super-majority of the citizens; and (I would suggest - though perhaps this is not the place to discuss this) would be re-applied every seven years or when the monarch resigned (abdicated) or died or ceased to be a citizen.
It is up to this current tranche of citizens to make, and largely agree upon, the succession rule. Future "generations of citizens" could also do what we are now (in our freedom) talking about doing.
"Talossa is free" is not the same as "Talossa is unchangeable" - Freedom is stability: Fettered Stasis is not.