Quote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Yesterday at 08:49:08 PM@Mximo Malt The changes you have made in response to the stated concerns are helpful. I would note you currently have co-sponsors across three parties including one from the governing party and this is also good as something of this import should be a multipartisan effort. I remain supportive of your effort here and hope that both sides of this divide will work toward reconciliation.

Yeah, I'm not really worried about that. Majestas' response to my attack on our National Latinish really made me consider what I'm really fighting for here. I now regret ever saying anything harsh against him and vow never to do this again.

Tafi (if I'm even allowed to call you that anymore), I'm willing to do anything to gain your forgiveness. All I can say is that I'm sorry. You don't have to believe it if you don't want to.

I might as well just shut the hell up now before I cause even more irreparable damage to my reputation.

MM

@Mximo Malt The changes you have made in response to the stated concerns are helpful. I would note you currently have co-sponsors across three parties including one from the governing party and this is also good as something of this import should be a multipartisan effort. I remain supportive of your effort here and hope that both sides of this divide will work toward reconciliation.

I also fully support S:reu Tafial, not just as a member of government, but as a citizen of this nation. It is without question that he is currently the kingdom's premier language expert and has demonstrated time and time again his commitment to our linguistic heritage as Talossans.

These sorts of attacks are not productive *especially* when the goal is to convince the majority of the Ziu (let alone the whole citizenry of Talossa) to support a highly divisive resolution.

I approve.

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Yesterday at 07:36:18 PMI have an issue with the way this bill is formatted. It makes it really difficult to see at a glance what exactly is being changed, since both versions of OrgLaw.VIII.6 look almost the same.

I would recommend changing it to instead say something to the effect of "Paragraph 5 of OrgLaw.VIII.6, which currently reads: <...>, is hereby deleted".

Excellent suggestion, I have made that change.

I approve.

Call me biased, but I think this is fine.

I have an issue with the way this bill is formatted. It makes it really difficult to see at a glance what exactly is being changed, since both versions of OrgLaw.VIII.6 look almost the same.

I would recommend changing it to instead say something to the effect of "Paragraph 5 of OrgLaw.VIII.6, which currently reads: <...>, is hereby deleted".

In case it can possibly need to be said still, I have every confidence in Tafial as a guide to our language. I do not think his competence is in question, no matter his attitude towards our founder.

Time and time again, when I have needed help with the language, he has been there. This ranges from a full set of assistance with translations when I served as regent to multifaceted and complex assistance with proofreading and ideas on our recent language lessons.

I just fought tooth and nail to ensure he would also be elected Tuischach, even though we are generally associated with different political parties, so my general confidence in his judgment cannot also be in doubt.

The text itself is fine. I have some questions about the mechanics it describes (needing a majority of the Cosă to find the Túischac'h absent first, only to have a majority of the Cosă select a new Túischac'h anyway feels like an unnecessary intermediary step), but I suppose that is allowed.

I approve.