Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 03:33:35 PMYes, we know that your statement was true to what you believe happened. We all know that. You don't think there was anything wrong with your behavior. We know. That's the problem.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 03:29:20 PMAs Mic'haglh pointed out earlier, it's a bit pointless to criminalise something that is impossible to detect afterwards, so making it detectable in the first place is worth much more than 10% to me, especially if the proported purpose is furthering Government transparency. But admittedly, this is firmly in hair splitting territory.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 03:29:20 PMAs Mic'haglh pointed out earlier, it's a bit pointless to criminalise something that is impossible to detect afterwards, so making it detectable in the first place is worth much more than 10% to me, especially if the proported purpose is furthering Government transparency. But admittedly, this is firmly in hair splitting territory.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 03:28:21 PMYeah, no one buys that as an apology. Most of your "apology" is just an announcement that you didn't do anything wrong.
It's funny how much of this would just evaporate if you could just find it within yourself to actually apologize. To seem like you knew that you stepped over the line, when you kept on after someone else.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Today at 03:23:29 PMAs an addition to legally requiring public disclosure, I guess that would make sense? I'm not too fussed about it either way when we get to this juncture, because I do think that just making it actually against the law to do this in secret is 90% of the battle.As Mic'haglh pointed out earlier, it's a bit pointless to criminalise something that is impossible to detect afterwards, so making it detectable in the first place is worth much more than 10% to me, especially if the purported purpose is furthering Government transparency. But admittedly, this is firmly in hair splitting territory.
QuoteSo sure, yeah, if that's what gets everyone on board, I'd be fine with adding that to the bill. Do you have suggested language or would you prefer I write it?Nah, go ahead.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 03:18:17 PMQuote from: Breneir Tzaracomprada on Today at 03:16:54 PMQuote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 03:15:18 PMWell, that's only half of your apology (and note how even then you talk about everyone else is "committed to seeing" your statements as harrassing). You forgot to post the second half in which you relativise and make excuses for your behaviour.
So, in the first half you now admit that I did apologize for the discomfort I caused Luc?
Yes, that was what I was refering by "I'm sorry you took it the wrong way". Not once did you actually apologise for what you said, but rather for how they came across. That is gross.
Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 02:56:04 PMIf you simply were to give access to an account with mirrored applications on it to e.g. the Tanaischteu you wouldn't need any further edifices. Better yet, the Opposition wouldn't have to wait until they win an election to discover illegally suppressed applications, since they have full access to the emails as they come in in real time. Wouldn't that be preferable?
Quote from: King Txec on Today at 03:13:31 PMTwo points: first, it seems that if the opposition did as most other parliamentary systems do, which is to employ a shadow cabinet, then could not the Shadow Immigration Minister perform this function?
Quote from: King Txec on Today at 03:13:31 PMSecond: Chief Judge Edwards doesn't advise me in any substantial way, is not on my Privy Council, so I don't exactly know what you are referring to Baron. Puisne Judge Plätschisch is a member of the Privy Council, however, but his advice is limited to the functions of any other Guaír (as are you).It's not done as a matter of practice, but the senior justice is ex officio a member of the Sabor, according to the law, Your Majesty. So is the Seneschal.
-Txec R