Our practice rink is outdoors, uneven, full of rocks, does not contain any water -let alone ice-, and may or may not be on top of explosives from WW2, so you have to cut us some slack here. We're trying.

Quote from: Glüc on Today at 08:31:53 AMHmm, it might be time to start paying some attention if the Zambonis are to defend their title.

Right now you wouldn't even get into the playoffs so yes, it is time to start paying attention LOL Good luck this week.

Hmm, it might be time to start paying some attention if the Zambonis are to defend their title.

Here are the week 10 results.

Els Talossaes Rexhitais def. Manager-less Team 1 308.30-242.40
Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis def. Cézembrean Amateurs on Ice 350.80-207.90
Tigreux dal Belacostă def. Gordon Hiatus Support Team 334.50-255.20
Maricopa Havana Hijinks def. Banqeu da Cézembre Zambonis 301.50-270.10
Vuode Villains def. Cjovani Squilats 371.20-327.80

Here are the standings after week 10.

1. Els Talossaes Rexhitais (7-2-0) 2,769.60
2. Vuode Villains (6-3-0) 3,135.70
3. Tigreux dal Belacostă (6-3-0) 2,870.90
4. Manager-less Team 1 (6-3-0) 2,718.90
5. Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis (5-4-0) 2,320.20
6. Cjovani Squilats (4-5-0) 2,612.60
7. Gordon Hiatus Support Team (3-6-0) 2,581.90
8. Maricopa Havana Hijinks (3-6-0) 2,326.50
9. Cézembrean Amateurs on Ice (3-6-0) 2,173.00
10. Banqeu da Cézembre Zambonis (2-7-0) 2,328.50

The week 11 schedule

Gordon Hiatus Support Team v. Manager-less Team 1
Banqeu da Cézembre Zambonis v. Maritiimi-Maxhestic Mençeis
Cjovani Squilats v. Tigreux dal Belacostă
Maricopa Havana Hijinks v. Els Talossaes Rexhitais
Vuode Villains v. Cézembrean Amateurs on Ice

Good luck to everyone this week.

Bon un rebelle.
Another game...

;)

Mximo

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 04:03:57 PMI thought if we presented our viewpoint, as well as discussed some of the damage you'd done, that would present you an opportunity to change your approach instead of just "hitting back." 

Change approach how, please?

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 01:15:56 PM(If it was, indeed, an attempt to negotiate in public, then it would never have worked without concrete signals of what the URL was supposed to do in response.)

There seems to be an issue here that the PA thinks that working with the URL would be doing us a favour (or even, rewarding us?) rather than something which would benefit Talossa with stable government. There seems to be no recognition that perhaps it is the URL that needs to be persuaded that a confidence/supply deal (rather than outright opposition) would be better for us.

I use risk online On Steam
I can set up a game
We need 6 players.

Mximo

The outcome of the vote was not a foregone conclusion, except inasmuch as character dictates destiny.  I thought if we presented our viewpoint, as well as discussed some of the damage you'd done, that would present you an opportunity to change your approach instead of just "hitting back."  It seems virtually certain that's not going to happen, since you don't seem to understand the situation, so I guess we're stuck with the status quo.

Thank you anyway.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on Yesterday at 03:10:16 PMThe big problem would be the one revealed in the recent Maricopa Senäts election - most voters don't understand that you need to rank more than one choice to get best value out of your vote.

As an aside:

I intend to write a post mortem on this election just as I did for the most recent Census, but I can already tell you I was surprised at the voting patterns in Maricopa and wanted to include a few lines about it. It's not that people don't know how to use the Database for ranked voting either; Belacostă and Fiovă both run provincial races with ranked voting and they turned out just fine, for two elections in a row even.

But at the Senatorial level, nada. Increased partisanship, difference in instructions provided, number and affiliation of listed candidates - I don't know why, but out of four multi-candidate Senate races in the two most recent GEs, only two voters ranked both declared candidates, one in CZ and one in MA.

(Aside over, and sorry for momentarily going off-topic.)