Azul, a reminder that, as of today, no party has fully registered by paying the required 6¤40 / 10$ registration fee to the Burgermeister of Inland Revenue. Please do so by the start of the First Clark in order to actually be able to assign and vote the seats you won. Please refer to https://wittenberg.talossa.com/index.php?topic=4019.0 for instructions.

@Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be @Baron Alexandreu Davinescu @Breneir Tzaracomprada @Max Maltezos @Garth Spencer

Senators-elect are also required to pay a 3¤20 / 5$ "winner's fee" in order to be seated.

@mximo @GV @Béneditsch Ardpresteir @Baron Alexandreu Davinescu (again)

That's a cool idea, but we can't give an AI a Witt account for technical reasons and privacy reasons, I'd think.  And I think Tafi is right about the quality of their writing... it hallucinates, and it usually ends up sounding like the same slop.

But I do think it might be interesting to try pointing an instance of Claude at the wiki and directing it to browse and look for things that seem like they should be updated.  It shouldn't do the updating itself, but such a list would be useful.  (Assuming it can actually competently do this, which... I don't know.)

I was actually thinking about this last night, and I think, whoever the next Seneschal is, they should reinstitute the bounty system offered by Sir Ian, years ago.  Improve the wiki a certain amount and you get to request a day of observance with photo/video proof of the Seneschal celebrating it.

Quote from: xpb on Yesterday at 11:25:32 PMI'm somewhat ignorant on the "how" but would it be plausible to get assistance from an AI tool to read Witt and then suggest changes to some of these pages? (of course subject to actual editing by respirating mammals...)

Probably not. Chances are the changes suggested would be vague to the point of uselessness, or completely inappropriate (if the AI hallucinates, which it does in roughly 20% of all cases).

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on Yesterday at 06:47:57 PMThis is a list of things that need doing.  Please feel free to add to it with your own suggestions. Some of these are just for people in charge of various things, and others anyone can do. If you feel like you want to contribute, please do so!

---

* Update the wiki Citizen's Portal, which hasn't been edited or updated for more than a decade.
* Update the wiki Manual of Style, which is also more than a decade old.
* Get TalossaWare available again by updating Printify vendors.  (Do we want a new service, or keep the easy one?)
* Update the main menu and government templates, since the government's been rearranged a bit.
* Post a reminder on the wiki and on the website interface about how it's illegal to delete any item public record, but also figure out if that law needs to be updated since it seems crazy.
* Figure out what to do about l'Chronica -- what versions get read and how much?
* Get a report on social media use... do we still need Twitter even now?  How can we simplify?
* Refresh the main page design.
* Create a policy for the wiki about political campaigning.

I'm somewhat ignorant on the "how" but would it be plausible to get assistance from an AI tool to read Witt and then suggest changes to some of these pages? (of course subject to actual editing by respirating mammals...)

G4
3 - Plastic Bertrand - Ça plane pour moi
2 - Kraftwerk - Tour de France
1 - Stromae - Fils de joie

G5
3 - Gérard Presgurvic - Et Voilà Qu'elle Aime
2 - Edith Piaf - Les Trois Cloches
1 - Joe Dassin - Les Champs-Elysées

Azul,

I'm looking for people to play risk online ?

Anybody.

If we can be 6 players could be nice to play some game.

Feel free to PM

See you

Mximo Carbonèl

Azul,

Thank you Florencia for your support.

I hope to protect our province interests the best I can.

Mximo Carbonèl

This is a list of things that need doing.  Please feel free to add to it with your own suggestions. Some of these are just for people in charge of various things, and others anyone can do. If you feel like you want to contribute, please do so!

---

* Update the wiki Citizen's Portal, which hasn't been edited or updated for more than a decade.
* Update the wiki Manual of Style, which is also more than a decade old.
* Get TalossaWare available again by updating Printify vendors.  (Do we want a new service, or keep the easy one?)
* Update the main menu and government templates, since the government's been rearranged a bit.
* Post a reminder on the wiki and on the website interface about how it's illegal to delete any item public record, but also figure out if that law needs to be updated since it seems crazy.
* Figure out what to do about l'Chronica -- what versions get read and how much?
* Get a report on social media use... do we still need Twitter even now?  How can we simplify?
* Refresh the main page design.
* Create a policy for the wiki about political campaigning.

Quote from: King Txec on Yesterday at 10:47:06 AMPardon my intrusion Baron into your party forum. As I was watching the election unfold it was apparent that some voters who voted on Witt copy/pasted and might have spoiled at least a portion of their ballots. I wonder if in the future we could work with Sir Luc on some way to avoid this while still making sure anyone who wishes can vote publicly on Witt. I'd hate for voters to be disenfranchised. I'm not sure how this could be worked out, but we have time until the next GE. What do you think?

-Txec R

I think that's a good idea!  And it's smart to start thinking about it now.  I will consult with Sir Luc and see what we can do... maybe including a "sample Wittenberg vote" template for people to use in the initial post, or as a follow-up post to which we can link directly?  We don't want to do anything that will target a legal practice in order to affect the outcome, but it's also really unfortunate when ballots get spoiled.

Thank you for the thought, Your Majesty!

Pardon my intrusion Baron into your party forum. As I was watching the election unfold it was apparent that some voters who voted on Witt copy/pasted and might have spoiled at least a portion of their ballots. I wonder if in the future we could work with Sir Luc on some way to avoid this while still making sure anyone who wishes can vote publicly on Witt. I'd hate for voters to be disenfranchised. I'm not sure how this could be worked out, but we have time until the next GE. What do you think?

-Txec R