Quote from: Sir Ian Plätschisch on Today at 07:11:02 AMFor the record, papal encyclicals are not considered infallible even by Roman Catholics (and I am not one).
I disagree with your assessment that the question must eventually be answered (the implication being answered through natural means in a way that provides proof). In light of Thomas Nagel's conclusions in his essay "What is it Like to be a Bat" (which I heartily recommend), it seems impossible that we would ever know what it is "like" to be an AI, or (the more important question here) if it is "like" anything at all, regardless of outward appearance.
There is no way of getting at the truth of this matter without adverting to philosophy.