Azul,

This is the kind of loophole we want to correct.

We always assumed that the vote finish when everybody have vote or when the fourteen days are over.

Mximo

All Progs should check our private forum for a vote that has begun today.

Mick

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on Today at 02:34:59 PMFor my part, at least when I was assembling the Belacostan Unified Statute, I combed through the old Benitian section of Witt XI to see what laws were still ostensibly on the books.

Its Florencian counterpart may be the closest thing that currently exists to any official archive. Speaking personally, that sounds like a good reason to create a Florencian version of el Lexh or the BUS, but perhaps this is a change best saved for after questions of constitutional reform.

Yep, the Florencia Journal was inspired by your work and I will also be submitting provincial legislation to emulate the BUS once we take care of constitutional issues.

Of course. I'll work on uploading everything this weekend.

- SPC Autófil

For my part, at least when I was assembling the Belacostan Unified Statute, I combed through the old Benitian section of Witt XI to see what laws were still ostensibly on the books.

Its Florencian counterpart may be the closest thing that currently exists to any official archive. Speaking personally, that sounds like a good reason to create a Florencian version of el Lexh or the BUS, but perhaps this is a change best saved for after questions of constitutional reform.

Good morning to my now-fellow Pastours -- I apologize for the delay, I wanted to make sure my appointment was official in line with provincial constitutional procedure.

In line with my previous pledge to do so, I abstain on Resolution 5. I believe this means the measure will pass with eight votes in favor, none opposed, and one abstention. However, do I correctly see no provision for the early closure of votes when their outcome is assured? If that is the case, per the bill's sponsor under Article IV, Section 3, voting is still open for ten more days, though I am happy to be corrected in the event I've missed something hiding in the Constitution somewhere. I apologize if this creates a bit of a needless delay, but given the highly unusual nature of Florencia's current executive arrangement, I'd prefer we really do things by the letter of the law to avoid any issues.

(If I am correct, that may be a good example of a reform for the Committee to keep in mind...)

WHEREAS it has been more than two weeks since @Crement Itravilatx first posted on Wittenberg following his introduction to the citizens of the Kingdom by officers of the Immigration Ministry, and

WHEREAS he has, in that time, demonstrated an active, genuine, and continuing interest in Talossan life, language and culture, and

WHEREAS he desires citizenship in the Kingdom of Talossa, and

WHEREAS by all indications it appears that he would be a loyal and dedicated citizen, and a credit to this nation if he obtains the grant of citizenship he requests,

THEREFORE I, Breneir Tzaracomprada, a citizen of good standing of the province of Florencia and of the Kingdom of Talossa, do hereby petition the Chancery @Sir Lüc to issue a grant of citizenship to Prospective Citizen Crement Itravilatx, as specified by law.

Just an FYI: I am out of town and away from my computer for a Nine Inch Nails concert, and I will have limited availability for the next couple of days.

and for fun you can take a balloon ride with the icon on the Radio Garden site and discover stations across the globe.