CRL Committee

[Tierçéu Rôibeardescù]

As of the passing it is now a required for we of the committee greenlight bills to be Clarked.
Myself (as speaker), the Mencai and the attorney general will make it known here our opinions as to the clarking of such bills.

I would request this post is pinned to ease.

[Tierçéu Rôibeardescù]

Ok so I'm back... Iyet I think it's lo late to rule on the latest bills. That is unfortunate. I will however say that due to concerns raised about it, the legal bill of crimes against talossanisity as currently written to my mind has skipped a key step in its writing process and has activitly not incorporated any feedback as to its nature. I believe a legal code is required to cover such crimes, however I agree there needs to be understanding of said laws set out. Using non native laws to enforce our own, with justices unfamiliar with said laws is a recipe for disaster in our courts.

[King Txec]

Ok so I'm back... Iyet I think it's lo late to rule on the latest bills. That is unfortunate. I will however say that due to concerns raised about it, the legal bill of crimes against talossanisity as currently written to my mind has skipped a key step in its writing process and has activitly not incorporated any feedback as to its nature. I believe a legal code is required to cover such crimes, however I agree there needs to be understanding of said laws set out. Using non native laws to enforce our own, with justices unfamiliar with said laws is a recipe for disaster in our courts.

Just as an FYI the 6th Clark is currently underway so you can vote in the current bills.

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

Just checking if my incoming colleagues on this committee, @the Mençéi and @the Túischac'h, are ready to start work for the First clark?

[esbornatfiglheu]

I am indeed ready.

[Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP]

I am ready enough.

[King Txec]

Just checking if my incoming colleagues on this committee, @the Mençéi and @the Túischac'h, are ready to start work for the First clark?

Just a heads up to the Mençéi, the Túischac'h, the King and the (incoming - not yet official ) Seneschal:

I'm having problems with the database. It is possible, thought not set just yet, that I may not be able to use the database for the upcoming Clark. If so, we will conduct the Clark the old-fashioned way here on Wittenberg. I will let all of you know when a decision has been made.

Thanks,

Txec

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

Wokay. Well, we can't do anything about the reclarked 55RZ21 because it needs to be the same language as last time. So you guys got anything to say about the Criminal Law Reform bill?

[Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP]

The bill is missing a section in which the references to the Wisconsinite class system outside of Lexh A.1-8 are replaced with the new threeway distinction. The affected sections are Lexh A.9.10, A.22, A.22.1, A.22.2, A.22.3 and C.1.4.4.
I assume the class I felonies will be rebranded to regular felonies, class A misdemeanours to serious misdemeanours and class C misdemeanours to regular misdemeanours.

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

Yipes! Thanks for picking that up. Will do so in 24 hours hopefully. Done! I had 10 minutes while waiting for the train lol.

[esbornatfiglheu]

With that fix, I can't find anything particularly problematic in the Criminal Reform Bill.  Nice catch.  So I think we should greenlight it to the Clark.

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

So what do you guys reckon on my bill for a form of "two readings" of legislation?

[Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP]

The bill itself looks okay on a first glance, but there are typos in the Talossan names that would need fixing:

el Comità da Redacziun Legislatïu > la Comità da Redacziun Lexhislatïu
Mençéi > Mençei

[esbornatfiglheu]

I'm not sure the bill is going to have the effect desired.  If it takes half the senators AND half the Cosa to move things into Committee, you're still coming up against the reading and engagement issue mentioned in the "whereas."

[Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC]

Okay my dudes, what about The Criminal Reform Bill Part 2?